Complete information on working SM style device.

[MarkSnoswell]

@bruce   and everyone

Iorn is not the only thing that will kill the effect... it's anything that unbalances the fields generated. The non radiating antennas are the same -- even although they do not radiate transverse signals they do radiate something -- and their delicate balance can be easily peturbed -- even by dielectrics close by.

The overall DC bias field in this case is simply to provide a static sielded environment. Electrostatic sielding is important here as well -- the same wires that provide the  steady magnetic environment also provide a steady potential environment.


Another thing... the interaction of the capacitance in oscilloscope probes with a resonant coil driven by high impedance (100K say) will result in a waveform that has a DC offset equal to the DC offset of the driving waveform. If you probe the environment around the resonating coil you will see that this static offset is not present -- it's a consequency of the oscilloscope capacitivly coupling the coil to ground. Now you can reverse this principal and bias your coils up to whatever potential you like and then easily apply a waveform on top of that via any number of methods (resistive, capacitive or inductive).


If you really want higher voltage square waves then just jack up the supply voltage to you Mosfets -- it really isn't hard. Iv'e done this for 500V+ supplies. The simplest supplies are simple voltage multipliers driven from main voltage. For saftey you would use a isolation transformer -- a pair or low voltage transformers back to back will work perfectly well for this.


Finally -- spherics mentioned ior wire delay loops giving micro seconds of delay... in my experience smal magnetic delay line loops give much shorter delays... which would be in keeping with other simillar device reports.

[sparks]

     It is important to note that Spherics design does not use the magnetic delay coils.   As he noted it is going to be frustrating to get the kick coils timed so that a comp field is generated then when you get them around the collector windings and inside the control windings have the effect go away and have to retime.
     I do believe that in his design it is important to use bifilar wire when forming the 4 coils.  These coils then have the capacitance built into them for the needed resonance.  Any eddy currents will be captured by the parallel conductor.
    I question if there is a specific rotation of the phased pulses about the tetrehedral generator.  The orientation to the Earth energy fields and manmade fields was already noted in this thread. 
    Thankyou Acer for your compilation.   I also find the crop circle analogy in this thread quite interesting.  Three outer circles: expansion/ the plain sphere-  compression/  the phi spiral-  spin/  the pinwheel.   The three components needed for spherical resonant structures like the proton.  Then the captured field within the pyramid with what appears as scalar waves radiating outward from the whole structure.  The farmer who did this to his well maintained fields sure knew his physics. 
 

[aleks]

It's laughable that any kind of wire can give microseconds of delay. EM field changes propagate at the speed of light. The only thing the iron wire coil can do is probably a higher self-inductance that basically works as a low-pass filter, probably with resonance. The only thing you are doing with cutting this iron wire is changing both the resonance (toward lower values I think) and frequency (toward higher values).

Of course, where resonance and low-passing happens, phase shifting also happens which can be also called time-shifting. However, this shift happens on some range of frequencies only.

[Rosphere]

I fired-up my CAD program this morning in an attempt to 'calculate' the 'vertical rise angle' of the the three base-coils.

Projection angles from the top view are simple: 120 degrees; three points of an equilateral triangle pointed towards the centroid of this base triangle.  We can imagine arranging these three base-coils on a horizontal plane 'base board' in this 'three spoke' configuration as a starting point.

We can then angle each base-coil upwards to some number of degrees so that each base-coil now points towards the centroid of the tetrahedron.  Given enough time, I am sure that I could calculate this angle the old-fashioned way by using 3D trigonometry methods.  But since I plan to use CAD to design my coil support structure, I decided to cut to the chase and just measure my angles directly from a basic CAD framework.

I should be confident that my result of 19.471 degrees is accurate, but I have not been batting a thousand lately as evidenced by my editing of my last couple of posts here. 

Has anyone else calculated this 'rise angle' of the three base-coils and have you obtained the same result?

Regarding this image posted earlier:


The adjacent angle is: 180 - 109.5 = 70.5
The triangular complement is: 90 - 70.5 = 19.5, which is what I found. 


Regarding the image below: Yellow lines are the six edges of the tetrahedron.  Pink lines are on each triangular face, bisect each angle, and meet at the centroid of each face.  Green lines are inside the tetrahedron and connect each corner to the opposing triangular centroid, all crossing at the tetrahedron centroid.

[Gustav22]

Hi Rosphere,

...
@Jdo300,

I will build the coil assembly if you make the 300V circuit.  (Nothing fancy now.) 
...

so Jdo300 agreed to the deal?
That would be tremendous.
I wish you two the very best.

However, I dont' t understand why you have to calculate the "rise angle"

I think spherics has stated the numerical value of that angle:

... and the other 3 coils (X,Y,Z) will be pointing to wards the center BUT note the three coils will not be in a horizontal plane; they will be pointing 30 degrees upwards. 

Why would you think that 30? is not the correct and applicable value for the angle between the horizontal plane and the axis of coils X, Y, Z?

PS: I have once built a pyramid and I know that this 3D geometrical problems can be very daunting.