OU/COP>1 switched cap PS cct like Tesla's 'charge siphoning'

[alan]

Very old paper, thanks anyway

http://www.newelectromagnetism.com/ is also very interesting, found it following the site in the pdf posted by minether, great find.

[MinEth3r]

Alan, here's my current take on Distinti's work:

    If one fuses the three formulas in one "Master Equation", one immediately see the speed vectors become normalised over C, they become Betas automagically, it gets interesting.

    Regarding Ke and Km, the point was made by Elliott a while ago about being in fact a single parameter conversion factor for currents, enough said :O)

    The first two terms from the v3 Magnetic Laws are in fact one, the relative radial speed, from relative electrodynamics ?la Weber and more recently Assis,- the relative radial acceleration (read: its mathematical expression) isn't mentionned per se in Distinti's work, as with basic rational trig (NJWildberger), basic Geometric/Clifford Algebra and some more advanced retardation calculation techniques such as in the work of Jaume Gin? (http://web.udl.es/usuaris/t4088454/ssd/index.htm , PERIHEL4.pdf ) that I would love to see, along with less Einsteinish propanganda BS - nobody has to give in - and more euclidenrelativity.com-kinda work, more like-minded math.  A Newer&Better , albeit the Final entry-level Electromagnetism, it's just around the corner, really, should be done in our spare time by the end of the Summer, what do you all think :O) glafreniere.com and al. are well on the way themselves. I'll be handing over some time, will naturally post a link to it somewhere on this forum, when the time comes!

   Lots of good reading material available on retardation, inertial drive, interesting canadian patents... lots and lots out there, albeit almost a shame we're still in the standstill. We could achieve throughout experiment simulation, the map would not be the territory, but a close to 100% virtual one perhaps? Would invite to design on-board components, like caps and inductors, stack them and them stack boards, maybe build the whole thing out of clay and ice? :O) No seriously, PCB embedded homemade components, just think Spark Bang Buzz @ http://home.earthlink.net/~lenyr/index.html if you doubt Merlinesque technology is far beyond your reach...

     Finally I feel the need to reiterate, http://drspark.com/idea003.php and it's graphs - entry point in your current effort - , graphs from the patent on switched Ultraconductors, it all speak very loudly! Nowadays a lot is possible on the electrical/dead energy front, a Lot! In fact, it always were that way, tremendous shame on us all

[allcanadian]

@MinEth3r

Also, this patent is dead simple, great idea, pretty interesting:
US7085123 @ pat2pdf.org

Yes, that is a very interesting patent ------ but can anyone here explain why it has a COP of 2 or 200% efficiency?. This looks like a standard charge pump but there is more here than meets the eye.

[nul-points]

Sorry for the previous, inspired late night post :O)

right-o Mr Minerva
i want half-a-dozen bottles of whatever you've been drinking these last couple of evenings - and i want them NOW!!!

As for newelectromagnetism.com, have a look at this
http://www.distinti.com/docs/cap_anom.pdf

most excellent, dude - someone, somewhere (Distinti) - finally - has paid serious attention to the cap re-charge issue

unfortunately, they know only its relationships - not what suckles it and gives it breath - ah, well....

time and tide waits for no man  - but the aether - wow, that's just been sitting there waiting for us for aeons

Also, this patent is dead simple, great idea, pretty interesting:
US7085123 @ pat2pdf.org

One lets the capacitor do the work, not the battery, the graphs speak for themselves!

now we're cooking ...wait, this looks familiar...

...a capacitor charged via a load - then - re-connected and discharged thro' the load with opposite polarity  - sure an' didn't i see a circuity-thing that looked the spit o' that on my website?

dayum - is there nuthin new under the sun?!?


greetings, MinEth3r
sandy
Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

[nul-points]

@MinEth3rYes, that is a very interesting patent ------ but can anyone here explain why it has a COP of 2 or 200% efficiency?. This looks like a standard charge pump but there is more here than meets the eye.

hi AC

if it really & truly is 200%, then i suspect that it's because - not only does the cap charge get passed across the load twice, once for each polarity, but also, the original voltage source gets added back into the series circuit with that now-inverted charge

of course, i only believe this at the moment because i'm 200% the way through an inverted bottle of whatever Minerva has been drinking...etc, etc

and, in the cold light of the morning after the night before, i shall publically deny any knowledge of ever having made such a statement - even tho' it will be indelibly typed across my very own corner of thread-dom

goodnight Canada (is there a drunken smiley?!)
sandy