OU/COP>1 switched cap PS cct like Tesla's 'charge siphoning'

[MinEth3r]

Let's try it once again:
If there's a magnet biaising the ferrite, maybe another type of biaising is in action,
much like the magnet being near the coil, thus imparting more energy?! Didn't read
the whole thread, and I ask it, maybe it's because its really worth mentioning at this point.

Halbach Arrays and biaising
====================
One can cook ceramics than can be magnetized in only one direction, lots of mecanisms possible, but if one does magnetize a Halbach magnet array made of those, by using a motor stator with poles as the fluxapplication mecanism, one can cook very fast ou devices.
Patents are around and readly available, deemed not too dangerous. One can build delivery robots going at 400 km/h on asphalt in between normal traffic with a 4000fps+ AI on board on top of magnetic bearings, using maybe an impulse drive to steer the thing?

Hodowanec has written about bringing a mass near a charged capacitor to create a spike, one should read about the things, as in Distinti's sayings : Inertia is mass and is electromagnetic, think here about glafreniere's model of the electron, a stationary 3d spherical standing wave in a 4D positive definite reality. One can use Conformal embeddings with vectors squaring to zero, special points/vectors at infinity and beyond to algebraically encode space and its inner, separate geometrical quentities - <= no better word, really, a new one while we're at it :O) - into coordinate-less transformation of information: you can kick tensors in the nuts and never look back.

Let's cite the most recent paper on euclideanrelativity, on what actually happens, supposedly:
This momentum is orthogonal to the 4-momentum vector of particles in rest. When the particle begins accelerating, its momentum vector rotates towards space so that the momentum vector that is added by the electromagnetic field is no longer orthogonal. This decreases the efficiency of the particle's acceleration. After all, the total magnitude of the particle's 4-momentum vector remains $ m_0 c$  at all times, so vectorially adding momentum can only be accomplished if the resulting momentum vector again has magnitude $ m_0 c$ .

Pfffff.... :O) I'll come back later with more tied up stuff for sure, hey its only my level but who cares :O) I'll try to find stuff on what we're looking at, if any avail. Rectification of Heat with small diodes, No NOOO, just, hmmm what else could do the trick to show how a sham this whole energy thing is. From every side; I hope people are reading this, total switch in values, in one own's global intepretal anisotopy, one's mind eye. Mau He heard in the distance, from all those distant, rising friends. (big japanese pun, if any)

***

In this day and age, we need more digital citizen warfare. http://ultratechnology.com , to get the spirit right on a part of the mecanics of these things :O) If you play with resonance, then let's try a bifilar coil instead, UsualVperTurn = V/n becomes = to V/2 instead, so you get distributed capacitance, and thus get with special(ly coated) wire very subtle impedance matching fun going on (resistance of void/air, around 377ohms anyone? http://www.classictesla.com/download/emfields.pdf for details, notice the BS thrown there and there, in light of Distinti's work), if you want of course. Thanks for your time everyone, I'm delighted at the response, lets try to keep this going towards something :O)

[MinEth3r]

"-." = .

Reality P0rn, its what science is all about. At least in the first fun stages of reading a maximum number of papers to get a grip on how things are done in this world :O) after that one has to be responsible, due dilligence of the rightous -? someone, somewhere?.

For your viewing (and groking) pleasure:
http://lanl.arxiv.org/find/physics/1/au:+Aquino_F/0/1/0/all/0/1

[alan]

Pease post more links you find relevant! 

Important to note is that Distinti proves longitudinal waves by experiment. If he really got it right, then who are too?
He perhaps: http://home.wanadoo.nl/raccoon/

Found this: http://www.scribd.com/word/full/4445?access_key=4vugu5b3zvfo8

[MinEth3r]

@alan,

great stuff, here's at first sight what I know about that might interest you.

The best *full, complete, selfsufficient* EM theories are from Andre Gsponer and Sameed Ahmed Kahn on Arxiv:
http://lanl.arxiv.org/find/physics/1/au:+Khan_S/0/1/0/all/0/1 , Full matrix theory of wavelength-dependant optics
http://lanl.arxiv.org/find/all/1/all:+gsponer/0/1/0/all/0/1 , some of Best math around using Generalised Functions! Derives lots of elementary results and correct them. They probably have holes.... one need to look carefully.

Notice in Gsponer  and al. 's work, inspired straight from Cornelius Lanczos, the need to take the the third time derivative into account. One needs to alter acceleration with an in-system entity, and then meta-magically manipulate its formula for stuff to happen, not play with the acceleration equation directly. Here's why retardation and stress not linear to strain can bring in the mix:
    http://www.rexresearch.com/dean/davis4.htm
taken from the file on the Dean Drive @ rexresearch, material up on Halexandria too. Jaume Gin?'s efforts on the matter of retardation
are to me the most Distinti-esque of what's available on the subject, his Mercury's perihelion precession paper is the best one overall IMHO.

Those would be the most relevant to me, thanks for the quaternionic EM reference by Saint Alban, didn't have it in my archives, snatched the pdf version, will probably read it by the end of today.

As for geometric algebra, and even higher, yet nicer and simpler math, read Douglas Lundholm on Arxiv.
http://lanl.arxiv.org/find/math/1/au:+Lundholm_D/0/1/0/all/0/1
His writtings will help you navigate through Geometric Algebra most powerful ideas more simply and explore some pretty advanced physics head on with a fresh approach, at least in my neophyte amateur point of view.

Guay, Alexandre (2008) A Partial Elucidation of the Gauge Principle on PhilSci is worth the read for those in need of answers about this particular subject, pretty clearly states that classical EM with U1 symmetry is wrongly so, and lots of other interesting stuff. His other articles are great too. Very proud he's working in Quebec :O)

* * *

Thanks have a great day and a great read too while you're at it c:O)

[nul-points]

hi alan

by now, you're probably wondering "what are the practical implications of all this?"


...and the answer is...


if you need to catch a train in an unfamiliar town....

    ...don't ask a mathematician or a physicist for directions to the station! 


have a good day all
sandy
Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc