The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[tishatang]

@Art

Here is the part of the text you are missing.

"We know, of course, that L2 is still in the ?physical space.? of L1, contributing capacitance to the combination."

It is just below Fig 1, the last sentence just before the last paragraph.  By trimming away excess coils of L2,  you alter the capacitance of the whole coil.  Changing the capacitance should alter the self-resonance frequency of that coil.  Unless, I am mis-interpreting it?  I am looking at it differently than the article was intended.

I was picturing winding a coil around a ring magnet and you wanted the coil to have a certain frequency of self-resonance.  Let us say it will be a passive coil and its beginning will be soldered to its end.  The goal is to get it to ring by passing a magnet over it.  To fine tune it, you either have to add a trimmer capacitor. Or experiment by trial and error, unsolder it and cut some off and re-solder it, very time consuming.  But instead of joining it to its end, we have extra coils around the core of the magnet after the solder joint.  To fine tune it, we need only to unwind some of the extra free end coils and cut them off with cutters.  No unsolder and re-solder needed?  Assuming we are just below our target frequency at the point we solder the coil together, trimming some excess will lower the capacitance, thus raising the frequency slightly.  This should work for either a flat wound coil on top of the ring or a torus wound coil, if the way I see it is correct?

Chris  (Tishatang)

[Spider]

A while ago is was talking to a friend of mine who has been involved with amature radio for many years.
We were discussing all this tpu stuff I was reading.
He said to me: There could be something in this. When I point my antenna's towards the sky it is quiet. But when I point them towards the ground I hear a lot of noise, and its not from radio stations.

Has anybody ever made a scan of all the noise comming out of the ground? Maybe, just maybe, there is a frequency which contains enough energy to keep a small circuit resonating, of maybe even run away when fed back? Just a thought....


Greetings Rene

[tishatang]

Hi Rene

Here is a link to using the ground as an antenna. 

http://www.borderlands.com/newstuff/research/ground-ant.htm

Maybe you or your friend can experiment along these lines?
According to reports, ground currents, sometimes called telluric currents, want to obey your wishes.  Something like at the quantum level, the particles behave differently because you are watching them.  If you research Nathan Stubblefield, I think he had complete control of these currents.


warm regards
Chris

[pauldude000]

@all

I am starting to think that we may be dealing with unaccounted for or "mis-defined" phenomena.

I was looking at the relationship of the electric and magnetic fields, according to a current in motion. I noticed something, in that the concept is A-symmetrical. All known forces are symmetrical in nature, in that for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. I was talking about this to loner in a different thread, and thought I would go a little more in depth here, as I did not wish to throw his thread off topic.

First, I will demonstrate a graphic I made, which demonstrates the concept.



The top drawing is the classical three line model showing that current, magnetic field, and electrical field are 90 degrees phased from each other. With current flow, both fields are generated at the same time, and these fields are perpendicular to the direction of flow, but separated by 90 degrees from each other.

The problem is that neither field is in opposition to each other, so what are the opposing fields which should be there? This is demonstrated in the bottom drawing with red lines and question marks.

Any ideas?

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

@Loner

Actually, I think I did just have a possible understanding of the bottom graphic. This is pure conjecture.

If you take the current line to mean "when current moves", the opposite would be "when current stops". This would mean that when current moves, the electric and magnetic fields are created.

It would also mean that the other two unaccounted for fields, which would mimic aspects of their correspondent magnetic and electric fields, would be generated when a moving current stops.

Radiant energy (electric field correspondent) and Gravity (Magnetic field correspondent, I hazard this due to it's similarities) perhaps?

These would be noticed the strongest, with the sudden speed of the stop initiated. Consider an extremely sudden current flow. You get massive and powerful electric and magnetic fields generated. With an extremely sudden current stop, you would see a massive effect of the other two as well.

However, either is hard to accomplish, since an object in motion tends to stay in motion, and an object at rest tends to stay at rest. (true for a force as well, as it demonstrates inertia.)

It ( C2 ) could also however be the product of a different particle flow than electrons, which is also possible.

Paul Andrulis

EDIT:

By the way, multiples of 3 are just an aspect of true resonance, in that frequencies of this multiple, or variations of this multiple, share exact rise and fall periods.

They are self-reinforcing, since at natural rise or fall time of any wave, the corresponding harmonics do not drop or rise when a longer wavelength lower frequency harmonic needs to drop or rise, but shares this exact drop or rise in potential.

My downloadable resonance calculator figures these as "true resonance".

Paul