The TPU uncovered? (A PROBABLE technique.)

[pauldude000]

@pese

I am not going to argue over something as dumb as this (not your arguments, they make sense,  the situation is dumb).

I would not have posted the circuit, unless I had already breadboarded and tested the circuit. There is alot of wierd things that happen but "shouldn't". The circuit works... build it before you tell me how it "can't", then explain to yourself when you look at the squares on your scope why it is working. Then get back to me and tell me why.

I found a schematic, tried it, liked it, modified it, use it, and am sharing it.

Paul Andrulis

[sparks]

    please review the below link.  It shows how rf catalyst energy can be used in a device much safer than an aether spinner.

   Little bit of good physics offered also by a very nice voice

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vCNNqgKqnaQ

[pese]

@pese

I am not going to argue over something as dumb as this (not your arguments, they make sense,  the situation is dumb).

I would not have posted the circuit, unless I had already breadboarded and tested the circuit. There is alot of wierd things that happen but "shouldn't". The circuit works... build it before you tell me how it "can't", then explain to yourself when you look at the squares on your scope why it is working. Then get back to me and tell me why.

I found a schematic, tried it, liked it, modified it, use it, and am sharing it.

Paul Andrulis

O no , it is OK.
It is possibel . THAT ONE CIRCUIT ist working "with you" and with YOUR CHOSEN components.
BUT is "shown for me" possibel, that an replication from other users - will not work-  This is the only one tat i sayd. If so. The users can construct changes in this trap.
I understand the circuit, and how if will and must work.

I seen a lot of "naudins circuits" with bad chosen components. that work outside the normal spects from datasheets, but if that work in the circuit. THE mext devive can possible not work, i he use semniconductors, from same type from other manufacturers or only from another lot . (I don over 40jyears , semiconduictor tests for consumers and industry, so i know the problems in the "production area.  Your Circuit and scematic , it is principially OK so.
(but ... if...)
G.Pese

[pauldude000]

@pese

In that aspect, I can understand. I have tested this circuit with some NE555's (bipolar) , and they do work, but will NOT overclock past 500K. That is why I specified the TS555CN, as it does. Out of five tested, I have only had one that refused to work right with the circuit. It did display bad waveform and low voltage, though the frequency was stable. With a different TS555CN though, it worked.

Paul Andrulis

[pauldude000]

@pese

One thing I noticed. It is not really that device specific, beyond the 555 itself.

I have built this circuit with various makes and models of components. For instance, I am using a 2n5551 right now, but a different gen purpose NPN on a different boarded situation.

I have replicated this aprox 3 DIFFERENT times on 2 different breadboards, with various timers replaced in the circuit, CMOS and Bipolar, and innumerable timing cap/pot variations. I have used 1n4148, 1n914, and other small signal diodes, and several NPN transistors..... It has worked pretty well every time, just with differences of available bandwidth.

The circuit has bands at the bottom of the resistance range that you can use to the base of the transistor. If you go to low it will not oscillate. Too high and the same. It also has a definitive upper and lower Timing Pot resistance limit depending upon the components you use. However, I have yet to see a failure of oscillation, or of a completely unstable circuit.

Times I have modified components? 20 or 30 or more? Heck, the version I am trying NOW is using different pots than what is listed in the schematic. (two 10k same transistor and diodes, but with 12pf caps... and it still works.)

That is why I am confused a little by the hesitation to try it. Build it yourself, see if you can over-clock my max of 4.9Mhz! (that may have been a limitation of that particular chip!)

Have fun with it! Build a serious circuit with it!

@all

I made a mistake. I bought some Mosfet drivers..... AND DIDN'T PAY ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT THEY WERE SMT! (I do not have the equiptment or experience for SMT devices.)

Does anybody want them? (just enough stamps to get them to you is the cost.) $7.00 out the window They are 8pin, and tiny!

Paul Andrulis