Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Special battery charguer, Is this possible to do?

Started by Magnethos, April 11, 2008, 06:21:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Koen1

@triffid:

I am pretty sure that's not what he meant...
After all he did say:
QuoteI have 2 cells, one giving a good amount of volts and the another a good amount of amps. Can I make a fussion to give the needed energy to the battery charger?
so it seems he is looking for a way to merge the output of a low voltage high amp source with the output of a high voltage low amp source
to try and get a high voltage high amp source, which he wants to use to run his battery charger on.
I think the only way to merge the outputs is something along the lines of the transformer idea I mentioned,
using the two power sources to feed two primary coils properly wired to obtain a nice flux in a core, then take the
output off the secondary...
But it seems to me that that cannot increase the total power output at all.
After all, volts times amps equals watts. If source A puts out 100V at 0.001 amps that amounts to 0.1 Watts,
if source B puts out 0.001V at 100amps that amounts to 0.1 Watts, the two combined can never give more than 0.2 Watts.
What Magnethos seems to be asking is: can we merge the two into a source C with 100V at 100amps?
The answer to that is simply: no. After all, that would mean that source C puts out 10,000 Watts, which is slightly more than 0.2 Watts.
Only 9.9998 kiloWatts of a difference. ;) Quite huge.


Magnethos

Quote from: Koen1 on April 14, 2008, 10:52:36 AM
@triffid:

I am pretty sure that's not what he meant...
After all he did say:
QuoteI have 2 cells, one giving a good amount of volts and the another a good amount of amps. Can I make a fussion to give the needed energy to the battery charger?
so it seems he is looking for a way to merge the output of a low voltage high amp source with the output of a high voltage low amp source
to try and get a high voltage high amp source, which he wants to use to run his battery charger on.
I think the only way to merge the outputs is something along the lines of the transformer idea I mentioned,
using the two power sources to feed two primary coils properly wired to obtain a nice flux in a core, then take the
output off the secondary...
But it seems to me that that cannot increase the total power output at all.
After all, volts times amps equals watts. If source A puts out 100V at 0.001 amps that amounts to 0.1 Watts,
if source B puts out 0.001V at 100amps that amounts to 0.1 Watts, the two combined can never give more than 0.2 Watts.
What Magnethos seems to be asking is: can we merge the two into a source C with 100V at 100amps?
The answer to that is simply: no. After all, that would mean that source C puts out 10,000 Watts, which is slightly more than 0.2 Watts.
Only 9.9998 kiloWatts of a difference. ;) Quite huge.


Yes Koen1, I mean exactly that. Sorry for my poor english but I tried to explain it the best that I can.
As you have said Koen, IÃ,´m trying to do that:
Source A: puts out 100V at 0.001 amps
Source B: puts out 0.001V at 100amps
What IÃ,´m trying to obtain: Source C-> 100V at 100amps

The idea was this: take the amperes from source B, and the voltage from source A to obtain a high amount of energy on source C.

I was thinking on that idea, because I "designed" a device where you can obtain the voltage that you want, but at little amperage. Is a water battery:

Note: the picture shows an old design of the WaterBlock Cell, and there isnÃ,´t the "Side Cells" that must be putting out enough amperage. This device only shows the main cell.

I can get more amperes from the water battery, but I must to increase the size of the wires a lot, and if I want to obtain a lot on watts, I must to increase the size of the device a lot. So, I thought... well, I can put a main cell (the center cell), that can put out X Volts at little amperage, and... How can I obtain enough amperage? And my possible answer was: ok, I can put two big electrodes at each side of the cell. So, if I have a big electrodes at the sides, I would have a good amount of amperes. So, if I merge the main cell that it putting out a good amount of volts, and the side cells, that are putting out a good amount of amperes.... I can get enough watts?

If you put more electrodes, you will get more volts.
If you put bigger electrodes, you will get more amperes.

But the answers is not...  :(

Koen1

Quote from: Magnethos on April 14, 2008, 02:33:45 PM
Yes Koen1, I mean exactly that. Sorry for my poor english but I tried to explain it the best that I can.
Hey no problem man, I figured it out in the end ;)

QuoteAs you have said Koen, I?m trying to do that:
Source A: puts out 100V at 0.001 amps
Source B: puts out 0.001V at 100amps
What I?m trying to obtain: Source C-> 100V at 100amps

The idea was this: take the amperes from source B, and the voltage from source A to obtain a high amount of energy on source C.
ok, so I did understand correctly. :)

QuoteI was thinking on that idea, because I "designed" a device where you can obtain the voltage that you want, but at little amperage. Is a water battery:

Note: the picture shows an old design of the WaterBlock Cell, and there isn?t the "Side Cells" that must be putting out enough amperage. This device only shows the main cell.
I can get more amperes from the water battery, but I must to increase the size of the wires a lot, and if I want to obtain a lot on watts, I must to increase the size of the device a lot. So, I thought... well, I can put a main cell (the center cell), that can put out X Volts at little amperage, and... How can I obtain enough amperage? And my possible answer was: ok, I can put two big electrodes at each side of the cell. So, if I have a big electrodes at the sides, I would have a good amount of amperes. So, if I merge the main cell that it putting out a good amount of volts, and the side cells, that are putting out a good amount of amperes.... I can get enough watts?

If you put more electrodes, you will get more volts.
If you put bigger electrodes, you will get more amperes.

But the answers is not...  :(

Hold on there.
First of all: can you give me some more info on that water cell? (a website maybe?) It sounds interesting.
Second: Although it is not possible to transform the low wattage into high wattage simply by using one hV lowA primary
and one lowV highA primary, you have just said something that might enable you to get more power out...
Now remember, I have not studied this WaterBlock Cell yet so I cannot be entirely sure,
but it sounds like "simply" using a lot more and bigger electrodes should increase both voltage and amperage output...
Or it should, if it really is a matter of "more electrodes => more volts, bigger electrodes => more amps".
... but to be sure I really need to read up on the WaterBlock thing. :)

Magnethos

Hi again Koen1,
I have designed (in the picture program) and give the name to the WaterBlock Cell, so... I can?t give you a website where you can get more information. The only thing that I can say to you is that I get the idea from youtube videos, so.. see these videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-GAvA0YCxE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GdgnDHR2M5A
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw2bsqh86nA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZfsWwrivec
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6_MRRpd94Cs
In these videos, you can see the main concept.

The second one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B601aMfBirw
In this, you can see the water battery inventor. This cell, work in a diferent fashion. I think it uses a combination of magnesium and carbone powder, like the nopopo cells.
Nopopo cells: http://www.google.es/search?as_q=nopopo&hl=es&num=10&btnG=Buscar+con+Google&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&lr=lang_en&cr=&as_ft=i&as_filetype=&as_qdr=all&as_occt=any&as_dt=i&as_sitesearch=&as_rights=&safe=images

There are others, that can put out 10Watts(not sure), but these ones uses nanotechnology, so... we can?t replicate it.

Note: this kind of energy, only uses water (not hydrogen or something similar).

I?m goingo to extend this info. (I?M DRAWING THE PLANS RIGHT NOW. WHEN I END THE PLANS, I WILL PUT THEM HERE)

Update 1
I have some plans of some devices that I have designed that maybe some are free energy devices. One  of these, I?m 95% sure that is free energy device and is based on the waterblock cell and some combinations with other devices. I will post it maybe tomorrow.

I have found some water-powered clocks:
http://www.unpluggedliving.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/water-powered-alarm-clock.jpg

And I?m printing now the patent of a 1956 device who claims that is capable to put ot 100 volts at 10 amps, and it seems to be like the waterblock cell. The main difference is that the device uses a 300Mhz frequency to obtain more energy from water and this device can put out energy 70 years!!

http://www.geekalerts.com/h20-multi-function-alarm-clock/

The design that I told to you. Merge volts with amps.

Koen1

Wow thanks! :D

I'll need to read that stuff through,
but I really appreciate you putting all this info up here. :)

Will be back after reading it all. May take a day or so as I'm very busy,
but I'll definately reply. Thanks again. ;D