HIGH QUALITY TPU DVD Video Released from Jack Durban

[jdurban]

QUESTION TO JACK DURBAN PLEASE:

what is the material the 2 black rings are made of in the OTPU?

if you don't know, please say so and we can drop this question.

thanks

Wood.

I would completely discount any exotic materials anywhere in the device as the videos support. The device is ultra simple and if SM could build them anyone can. It's just finding right relationship between the windings.

You must understand that SM was and is a B.S. artist, a con man. I know some of you can't fathom that but it is fact. I know first hand. He will lie when there's no reason to lie. He makes claims that anyone can prove false. Case in point: his reference to having hundreds of patents and one had over 750 pages. All 100% B.S. He has one utility patent on an unproven 3D sound theory and 5 design patents on speaker aesthetics. The sound patent is a real patent. The design patents are worthless.

As one who has written dozens of patents and read thousands I can't recall ever seeing any patent over a couple hundred pages regardless of of the technology or process.

This device was already in existence long before SM somehow got his hands on one.

[Localjoe]

@Jdurban
    After looking through patents 381,968  381,970 and 382,279, tesla described a set of modifications throughout all those patents that when combined would look similar to motor with a generator superimposed upon it.  He describes how to get rid of the contacts so the motor needs no moving parts and describes how the generator can be built  in similar construction. later he associates a drawing that represents a motionless motor wound on an annular iron core with 4 sets of coils in quadrature with multiple coils imposed upon the sets "superimposed", he later describes how one could encase that whole device in a continuous steel shell .  Whats your take on the modifications he proposes in those patents.
                                                                                                                      Joe
@Bep
This sure sounds a lot like what your describing



The inducing or primary coils wound on the core I
are divided into pairs or sets by the proper
electrical connections, so that while the coils of
one pair or set to co-operate in fixing the magnetic
poles of the core at two given diametrically-opposite points, the coils of the other pair
or set?assuming, for sake of illustration, that
there are but two?tend to fix the poles ninety
degrees from such points. With this induction
device I use an alternating-current generator with coils
or sets of coils to correspond
with those of the converter, and by means of
suitable conductors I connect no in independent
circuits the corresponding coils of the generator
and converter. It results from this that the different electrical phases in the generator
are attended by corresponding magnetic
changes in the converter; or, in other
words, that as the generator-coils revolve the
points of greatest magnetic intensity in the converter will be progressively shifted or
whirled around. This principle I have applied
under variously-modified conditions to
the operation of electromagnetic motors, and
in 'p previous applications, notably in those having Serial Nos. 252,132 and 256,561, I have described
in detail the manner of constructing
and using such motors

[poynt99]

@ Jack, thanks for the reply on the material. are those the speaker parts you mentioned before?

[turbo]

You must understand that SM was and is a B.S. artist, a con man. I know some of you can't fathom that but it is fact. I know first hand. He will lie when there's no reason to lie. He makes claims that anyone can prove false. Case in point: his reference to having hundreds of patents and one had over 750 pages. All 100% B.S. He has one utility patent on an unproven 3D sound theory and 5 design patents on speaker aesthetics. The sound patent is a real patent. The design patents are worthless.

Jack,

What is the chance that the devices themselfs were a fake?

Suppose he would connect them to a charger at the end of the day to charge them up for next show..
There are many ways to fake what is seen on the video tapes.
I can build something that looks exactly the same with a series of nicad's inside and power bulbs for a short period of time.
Is it possible that he hired you to come up with something that would work just because his was a fake??
If Steven was that master of BS and the con man, then i think the device itself could be fake too because he was just in for the money...
Many people who work on something for a long time fake it when they cannot get it done.

M.

[jdurban]

@Jdurban
    After looking through patents 381,968  381,970 and 382,279, tesla described a set of modifications throughout all those patents that when combined would look similar to motor with a generator superimposed upon it.  He describes how to get rid of the contacts so the motor needs no moving parts and describes how the generator can be built  in similar construction. later he associates a drawing that represents a motionless motor wound on an annular iron core with 4 sets of coils in quadrature with multiple coils imposed upon the sets "superimposed", he later describes how one could encase that whole device in a continuous steel shell .  Whats your take on the modifications he proposes in those patents.
                                                                                                                      Joe
@Bep
This sure sounds a lot like what your describing



The inducing or primary coils wound on the core I
are divided into pairs or sets by the proper
electrical connections, so that while the coils of
one pair or set to co-operate in fixing the magnetic
poles of the core at two given diametrically-opposite points, the coils of the other pair
or set?assuming, for sake of illustration, that
there are but two?tend to fix the poles ninety
degrees from such points. With this induction
device I use an alternating-current generator with coils
or sets of coils to correspond
with those of the converter, and by means of
suitable conductors I connect no in independent
circuits the corresponding coils of the generator
and converter. It results from this that the different electrical phases in the generator
are attended by corresponding magnetic
changes in the converter; or, in other
words, that as the generator-coils revolve the
points of greatest magnetic intensity in the converter will be progressively shifted or
whirled around. This principle I have applied
under variously-modified conditions to
the operation of electromagnetic motors, and
in 'p previous applications, notably in those having Serial Nos. 252,132 and 256,561, I have described
in detail the manner of constructing
and using such motors

Glad to see you are thinking Tesla, especially US 381,970. As depicted there is no other document I am aware of that so closely represents the SM device from a conceptual viewpoint. I need to revisit the disclosures made in the specification to refresh my memory but one thing that stood out more than anything at the time of my first review was Tesla's obvious attempts to conceal key elements in preferred embodiments while teaching others. I am not familiar with the statutes of that era but today to not fully disclose best mode is a violation of patent law and would invalidate such a patent upon demand of re-examination and if best mode was not disclosed.

In general terms it looked as if Tesla feared full disclosure of best mode by focusing on conventional generator means rather than embodiments that might appear to be that of a perpetual motion machine that could be rejected by statute.

Motive must be considered in reading anything having to do with over unity inventors!