Science contradicts itself..Questions

[rangerover444]

Also allow me to say,

  If we view magnets = electrons, it?s even much worth then view them as separate
entities, since there is a big difference between them (see my last 3 posts). 
Now, the ?Gary Line? (between electricity and magnetism) I mentioned before, is
because since Faraday (he was the last one to understand that they are not the same thing),
no one (beside Ed, maybe Tesla and maybe very few researchers), realized who comes
first, and once J.J. Thomson came ?invented? his Electrons
http://www.leedskalnin.net/elect-1.htm then they become one and the same, which is an
absurd of course, unfortunately everyone is captures by these imaginary particles.

About Ed Leedskalnin, it is important to separate between Ed the man / what he did
and his massage.  Ed himself is an open subject to discuss, whether his generator was
An OU machine, or he levitate blocks in the air or drill through the Coral rock with
Magnetic waves - all this is a speculations and everyone will judge it for him/her selves.

Ed?s massage is a different story, since it?s about reality right this second and how it works.
evidently he was smart, since he did not come up with a theory that explain how to build
an OU machine or why the Big Bang theory is nonsense.  He started from the most basic
building blocks of the universe (Magnets).

Just look around and see how ALL trends of science are confused, unrelated with each
other, not even synchronized, isolated from each other light years.  Most of this confusion
(not all of it but most), is because this little mistake back in the 19th century. Since if that
Would understood as ?nature suggest?, everything would look different today.

Just thoughts.

Enjoy

[Charlie_V]

Cocaine's a hell of a drug!

[rangerover444]

 Charlie_V,

Looking at your model (the one that try to show why Monopoles cannot exist),
I can tell you right away before even going down to business, that your model
show many things, but not the non existence of monopoles !!!

First let me ask you (don?t mean to embarrass you) :
Did you do this test yourself, and these are the results you got ?
I?m asking, since I just made exactly the same test (5 min. ago) and the magnet
always turned in the same direction, in both cases !!!
So maybe I did something wrong - please explain.

Before continue to ?why it works? like it does, I want to make sure we have the
same results.

Cheers

[Charlie_V]

Sorry rangerover444, yes I did this experiment but it was several years ago.  I could of sworn I used aluminum but maybe it was iron/steel.  The flux lines on the inside of the magnet are in the opposite direction to the outside, but the inside flux is much more concentrated than the outside.  In the experiment I did, there was a point where the magnet would turn one way, a point where it wouldn't spin at all, and a point where the magnet would spin in the opposite direction. 

Its a balancing act.  Try replacing your aluminum ring with an iron one (make sure the ring's thickness is pretty good).  Then try applying the terminal to the spots I have shown in this new drawing below.  If this doesn't work I'll try to dig up my old note book to see exactly what I did.  This worked for me before, it should work for you too. 

Once you get this working, I'm up for any interpretation you might have regarding how you think it works.  The principle of this device is based on the Lorentz force.  The classical explanation is that the flow of "electrons" or current through the magnet is at a 90 degree angle to the magnetic field.  Using the right hand rule, the magnet will feel a force in the direction tangent to the magnet's circumference, which causes it to spin.  This is a simplified version of a Faraday disc.  But it was interesting to me that the fields on the outside were different from the inside. 

[Koen1]

@rangerover: You are making contradictory claims.
First you laugh at me for using the electron model, implying that
electrons do not really exist, but rather it is Eds "magnetic particles".
Now you say electricity and magnetism are two different things.
Ergo they do exist as different things.
Ergo there are electrons, or my statement that you can rewrite
one into the other is valid.

Study electrodynamics before shouting nonsense.

And you still have not come up with any Leedskalnin based
experiment that does not accord with "standard" electron-based
physics models.

First show yourself to be right, before you try to burn us.