Roll on the 20th June

[Artist_Guy]

Robert,

Nice idea, nice design, nice graphic, and nice attitude/insight!

Welcome to OU.

Its a wild ride with socially redeeming qualities.

Nice to have you aboard.

EDIT: To be fair, your idea parallels some posted already, but your design could be best.

Go for it man!

Thanks.   

I fathomed these particular concepts up from my own attempt at the wheel replication and the need to beat some of the problems that presented themselves in a practical sense, but I am sure some of that it may be similar to some other things seen around here or elsewhere. 

I am not sure I have the patience to wind up 2 EM's but I might get around to it in a bit. I'd go wonky and want to make some stepper motor EM winder or something... I am always getting distracted. 
 

[The Eskimo Quinn]

go away for a couple of days, and it all goes to shit.

Just one question?? balanced levers etc, where do you people get this shit from??

whatever the newtonians use in their text book we use, if their math does not work, it does not work, you cannot make new rules for my lever that newton and your text books did not apply to yours, equal equipment at the beam. and i win it is that simple, my fulcrum is simply more powerful.

Why? beacuse on the wheel you will note the newtonians are happy to quote rotational dynamics, which in turn says

the top half of the rotation up and over the hill between 11 and 1 cost the most, and that the lower hald costs less, and that is why your wheel arm will always fall but never get back over the hill.

and the egyptians knew this as a basic phyics principal to be true(without the knowledge of magnetics)

and it is true which is why the egyptian fulcrum is more powerful, for it runs 1 to 11 the natural fall and momentum all newtonians agree exists, where their lever must go up and over. to say the freefaal is equal to the power needed to lift between 11 and 1 would say that a wheel will keep turning without any leverage at all.

oh, and did i only use a 20 to 1 lift in that experiment?? oooopps, kinda forget to put the accelerator down, will fix that error tomorrow.

What?? you think i wouldnt suck in the newtonian liars to present their "best possible math" bullshit, so i could kick it to death in a full power demonstration?

Oh please, you should know me better than that by now.

Hope you all had a good weekend, talk tomorrow.

[The Eskimo Quinn]

oh and those of you having trouble with the arms, or those contemplating building the wheel, as i said, one post with your magnets of choice on the rod and a single hole that would be centre, and have your reppeling magnets at the base and just keep extending the arm will weights past the wall until it breaks from a drop at 1 oclock, then you have the correct arms for the wheel, or if you have built, take one off an do this until the wall breaks, then replicate all the arms the same. if it works in singular it will work all the time.

[spinner]

....
Just one question?? balanced levers etc, where do you people get this shit from??

whatever the newtonians use in their text book we use, if their math does not work, it does not work, you cannot make new rules for my lever that newton and your text books did not apply to yours, equal equipment at the beam. and i win it is that simple, my fulcrum is simply more powerful.

Priceless... I see you will never grasp a simple lever...  Oh, Mighty Quinn! The savior of the world!

...
Why? beacuse on the wheel you will note the newtonians are happy to quote rotational dynamics, which in turn says

the top half of the rotation up and over the hill between 11 and 1 cost the most, and that the lower hald costs less, and that is why your wheel arm will always fall but never get back over the hill.

You don't know what are you talking about. Another misconception of yours. It's actualy the left or right side of unbalanced wheel (depending on CW/CCW rotation) which "costs" most...

...
and the egyptians knew this as a basic phyics principal to be true(without the knowledge of magnetics)

and it is true which is why the egyptian fulcrum is more powerful, for it runs 1 to 11 the natural fall and momentum all newtonians agree exists, where their lever must go up and over. to say the freefaal is equal to the power needed to lift between 11 and 1 would say that a wheel will keep turning without any leverage at all.

oh, and did i only use a 20 to 1 lift in that experiment?? oooopps, kinda forget to put the accelerator down, will fix that error tomorrow.

What?? you think i wouldnt suck in the newtonian liars to present their "best possible math" bullshit, so i could kick it to death in a full power demonstration?

Oh please, you should know me better than that by now.

Hope you all had a good weekend, talk tomorrow.

You must have had some traumatic experience in your childhood... Was it mr. Newton, working in an oil-refinery nearby?
This would explain your hate towards "Newton" and "Oil"... To some degree..

[cub3]

Reluctant to post, so much aggro.

I am neither one way or the other as for or against AQ is concerned.

I see so much garbag said about light end versus heavy end.

So  very little about beam under slung fulcrum point.

Should not this as all idea's be considered.

A Question to you all what does the underslung balance point of this mechanism contribute?

Kind Regrades

Den