Roll on the 20th June

[The Eskimo Quinn]

anyone know how to remove registration from here, this is a waste of time here now, but i can't find anything that say remove profile.

If a 5 to 1 lever can lift 20 to 1, outside of breaking newton the only answer is that it is unfairly weighted, thus return cost would be far greater, in fact it would prove no excess power as the entire 40 kilos of power would be used by the 12 for lift and the remainder for return, so there is equal power out as in.

yet when shown the weight, and that on those figures 19 kilos is the cost for return of a perfectly weighted lever, and this was not only true, but less, show there was no lift gained from the front.

it is that cut and dried. i will be posting some more video, of total control, lift greater than 5 to 1 and full return of the lever, yes i am going to fix 20 kilos weight to the short end as part of that weight before i even start the lift, so afterwards it will return, so to achieve any lift at all for the next and last video, i will have to destroy 20 to 1, and thus with replicated return, say fuck you and all your friends.

because the weight for return test shows any engineer in the world, i could not be overweighted at the front. and i am wasting my time with people who have little or no understanding of the basics.

My site title page is indeed correct.

Check the u tube, i will speak only in action.

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi Archer
Try this you don't have to change anything, add 20 more k's to your short side this gives you 40k's there and 1 extra k to your long end this gives you 2k's there, do not change the wieght of your beam by slipping rods into it, leave it the way it was at around 30k's.

With the extra weight I just said you are still at 20:1 but it will not move, you can add another 6k's to the long end this puts you at 5:1 and it still will not move.

Why wont it move because you are not at a true 5:1 and after you have did this then I will tell you why its not moving and why your not at a true 5:1.

If this does not prove it to you and your bean is still moving all it will mean to me is your conning people and adding wieght to your beam.
Take Care Archer
Graham

[ramset]

Archer they will follow you to u tube   and drive you nuts over there too  your fulcrum sure looks cool  how are you going to safely climb up that high to cycle the machine at full power  it does not seem safe   don't rush for those that KNOW you wrong    they will be there no matter when you show them   be careful without the tower built at the high end you are risking to much    twenty feet up trying to place weights and hold a camera still   is dangerous    you may learn more than you need to about gravity     take your time who gives a crap about a date  be safe     Chet 

[mango tarbash]

Don't dare un-register Archer! You'll be giving these tedious U-bend bloaters exactly what they came for!!

At the very least continue to goad them for your own amusement.

They've really painted themselves into a corner by their dogmatic submission to contemporary physics laws - as if there is not a single variable left in the universe which we can discover. Saying over and over 'this won't work', 'that can't work', ad nauseum...and then haunting an OU forum of all places!! Like W+hore-haters who spend all their money on Whores!!  Newtonian neurosis!

For me, they have just become irritating chatter and easily tuned out. I want ideas, and you, and a handful of others here have them! I don't care if there are many dead-ends - eventually one of us is going to make it out of the maze...and it won't be through chanting worn out math.

Keep them coming.

[sm0ky2]

I figured out this fulcrum thing. Nobody thus far has been correct.

i'll give a detailed description & drawing when i get home tonight. i would build one, but once you see what im talking about i dont think it would be necessary. Archer already built it and we can see how it operates.

wether or not this is "OU" depends on your perspective i suppose. but it does lift at a 4:1 ratio, with respect to length/height and mass (because if only goes 1/5 the height 20/5). now if you change any of these ratios, you have to adjust the machine to correspond, which is the purpose of the control rods. he can indeed move those rods and get a higher lift ratio, how high depends on two unknowns, which i will describe in my post.  Hint: 19.1kg (leveraged) are in the air on the long end, offset by a resistive portion of the device. adding 1 kg, sets this over the breaking point of that resistance, and you have in fact a 20.1(leveraged) : 20 lift ratio (lifting half the distance).  bringing this back to 19.1 the lever pulls itself back up, and the (now non balanced) 20kg comes crashing down.
There are 4 key factors here, none of which are Newtonian in nature.

Take another look at the actual device. Note that while there is a 5:1 length ratio, the mass ratio
is closer to 100 (leveraged) : 25    or a 4:1 distrubuted mass.