Roll on the 20th June

[MrKai]

Just as much as you like avoiding the question.

Oh, that was your concept?

I'm serious man, you've missed your calling, and the big machine of gov't is missing your contributions.
You're exhibiting the very finest in mis-direction, and that has been their specialty for a while.

I'm an self-employed stoner, where else should I be expected to be but mentally masturbating on a site like this?

I'm an asocial dreg of society, a cause of the worlds ills, a human slowly burning up his short-term memory ability for self-indulgent pleasure.

.....and i have been amongst the LOUDEST to say so.

You're giving me too much credit.

Shouldn't I be beneath your notice?

What...are you talking about?

You asked what I thought I contributed, and that is honest debate.

For some reason, what honest debate is seems to escape you.

Here is what it isn't: Silencing of opposing views.

If you look at my posts, time and time again I have stated that my issue is with one particular person's utter and demonstrable lack of credibility...something I might add that no one has been able to present clear evidence to dispell, disperse or debate.

I have also encouraged people here that were doing what they are doing to keep at it; there is nothing wrong with doing it as long as it isn't being done out of BLIND IGNORANCE.

Anyone else here seeing the dichotomy of Special K's professed beliefs vs. his actions?

I doubt it, because there isn't any.

As for the below...

Can you please start tearing me up for the one concrete thing I laid out there that is not based on my beliefs or mis-conceptions?
(Errrrrr...ummmmmmm.......well, I guess I can't really say it that way since it hasn't been proven yet.)

Can we start tearing up the concept again, please?

I know you have dismissed the lever completely, and will respect that.

What about the siphon of "my" idea? (I will attempt to take ownership of this one concept, even though it was sparked [or unearthed actually] because of what someone else [who shall remain nameless in deference to your paradigm) made me think about.

Siphons do not work the way you posited; this was pointed out by a couple of people before.

Why is it that you don't build and test your own ideas and research them? Is ou.com supposed to be a free labor pool for  any and every thing someone utters, without even a base evaluation of plausibility?

Things like THAT are why the treatment from "outsiders" is so dismissive. I mean, would you buy something in a black box based on what someone claims might be any, with no proof whatsoever of what it is?

Why is it that asking for just a tiny bit of reason opens a floodgate of accusation?

It's just an air tight water tower with the pump replaced by siphon.

You can find it (starting) here:

( @ PureP

Here it is man, it's long and boring and multi-post, but there might be something in there, somewhere. )

Re: Roll on the 20th June
? Reply #2296 on: June 13, 2008, 08:57:06 PM ?

(I wish I knew how Harti links to the specific post.)

I realized this the other day, and it cracks me up to no end.

I posted it on Friday the 13th.

Why would I care about yet another unproven idea from another condescending jerk that doesn't even seem to understand the basic operating principles behind what they propose?

-K

[exxcomm0n]

@ PureP

Thanks man.

I'll do my best to return the favor.

1.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg104779.html#msg104779 (drawing)

2.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg104780.html#msg104780 (drawing)

3.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg104791.html#msg104791 (sort of applicable.)

4.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg104846.html#msg104846 (description)

5.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg104852.html#msg104852 (discussion)

6.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg104856.html#msg104856 (description)

7.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg104872.html#msg104872 (discussion/description)

8.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg104877.html#msg104877 (1st found mistake)

9.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg104905.html#msg104905 (sorta related, a different idea about the same concept.)

....and finally.......

10.) http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg105023.html#msg105023 (description, discussion, and me being snippy)

It'll be on Letterman next week as the top 10 reasons why you shouldn't talk to a stoner.



Deconstruct this fantasy of mine please.

i look forward to your estimation.

[looping]

Magnetic motor

http://www.greaterthings.com/News/FreeEnergy/Directory/Perendev/MagneticMotor/PerendevMotorFeb2003.wmv

[BATMAN]

BATMAN ...HI ALL

lets play nice IN F.E. SAND BOX.

# 2 PIC. OF THE WHEEL.

BATMAN.

[exxcomm0n]

@ Special K

What...are you talking about?

You asked what I thought I contributed, and that is honest debate.

For some reason, what honest debate is seems to escape you.

Here is what it isn't: Silencing of opposing views.

If you look at my posts, time and time again I have stated that my issue is with one particular person's utter and demonstrable lack of credibility...something I might add that no one has been able to present clear evidence to dispell, disperse or debate.

I have also encouraged people here that were doing what they are doing to keep at it; there is nothing wrong with doing it as long as it isn't being done out of BLIND IGNORANCE.

I doubt it, because there isn't any.

As for the below...

Siphons do not work the way you posited; this was pointed out by a couple of people before.

Well, since you are the voice of reason here (as you've said above), do it again.
Do your part for special education.

Why is it that you don't build and test your own ideas and research them? Is ou.com supposed to be a free labor pool for  any and every thing someone utters, without even a base evaluation of plausibility?

Theory

Liquids can rise over the crest of a siphon because they are pushed by atmospheric pressure. Siphons must be started by filling them in one of a number of ways. After priming, atmospheric pressure acts on both ends of the siphon, but the longer leg carries a greater weight of liquid. Gravity then drains the liquid through the longer leg, and this maintains the low pressure that was established at the start. Capillary action can enhance the siphon and cavitation may modify the phenomenon and cause the siphon to 'break'.[5].

Once started, a siphon requires no additional energy to keep the liquid flowing up and out of the reservoir. The siphon will pull the liquid out of the reservoir until the level falls below the intake (causing cavitation) or until the outlet of the siphon equals the level of the reservoir, whichever comes first. Energy is conserved because the ultimate drain point is lower than the liquid level of the reservoir.

The maximum height of the crest is limited by atmospheric pressure, the density of the liquid, and its vapour pressure. When the pressure exerted by the weight of the liquid equals that of atmospheric pressure, a vacuum will form at the high point and the siphon effect will end. The liquid may boil briefly until the vacuum is filled with the liquid's vapour pressure. For water at standard atmospheric pressure, the maximum siphon height is approximately 10 m (33 feet); for mercury it is 76 cm (30 inches).

Video demonstrations of the idea to come later when I have access to the DVD camera.

Things like THAT are why the treatment from "outsiders" is so dismissive. I mean, would you buy something in a black box based on what someone claims might be any, with no proof whatsoever of what it is?

Why is it that asking for just a tiny bit of reason opens a floodgate of accusation?

Why would I care about yet another unproven idea from another condescending jerk that doesn't even seem to understand the basic operating principles behind what they propose?

-K

Cuz we dow'n red sew will.

The interesting thing is that you keep coming back to amuse a stoner.

You ARE doing this for the benefit of your fellow man.