Roll on the 20th June

[zerotensor]

NEWTON WINS!

[MrKai]

This proves your propensity for NOT looking up what people have said and just firing off...your words:

I admit I haven't bothered to search your other posts. I just have the tone of this one, which rings of cynical amusement.

Lets see..you wanted an idea, ANY idea about a machine...no matter how silly:

Actually, I do have an idea. How about we make an engine powered by strawman fallacy arguments?

See? I'm willing to posit a ridiculous idea too. What I think you aren't getting is that I'm interested in USEFUL ideas or THOUGHTFUL analysis...there is NO MERIT in nonsense.

It raises the noise levels as much as exchanges like these do. The disingenuous part of it all is that folks can't seem to see that.

Look, what if all of the Free Energy that was poured into this thread was poured into something that had...you know...results?

My idea, my contribution is to consider THAT. I'd say that was as least as valid as anything else here. At least it is based on some solid principles.

-K

and look, here is one for a not-so-silly:

...has anyone actually considered if any of this foolishness with the magnets would be better suited for some sort of (electro)magnetic attract/repulse powered quasi-piston sort of operation?

As opposed to an overbalanced wheel. This occurred to me in the car that if one could work out a way to "bounce" a piston-like rod thingee off a repelling magnetic field, but it had the right weight, it would in theory go up and down on its own, so I suppose it would be using gravity.

As such a concept seems stone simple and obvious, I'm gonna guess someone has already tried this...The travel from the repulsion probably wouldn't be far enough to be useful, now that I think about it...but I don't mess with these sort of things so I could be mistaken.

Ah well

-K

Ooooh here is me helping someone find info on the coral castle guy:

Try here:

http://www.crystalinks.com/coralcastle.html

Whoa there! Is this Mr. Kai *encouraging builders?!?!*

I second this. I actually find much of this interesting...if not a bit redundant and sometimes futile...but never stupid.

I mean if it is a hobby thats cool, people like to build and tinker. It is when people make incredible claims that fly in the face of logic, reason, science and history...you know, the stuff that separates us from the rest of the species on this rock because we are cognizant of these things, that it raises an eyebrow..but most people are able to laugh it off politely.

This particular dude tho, sort of brought the outside into your world, and it will likely not be the same for awhile.

None of this should stop anyone from doing what they are doing, if they aren't doing it out of ignorance.

I mean the precision work of clanzer is something to see no matter what you are into; the ingenuity of Dusty is to be congratulated...for the sake of the art that it is...you know?

Its when you have a under educated narcissist throwing around grand claims, over-the-top accusations and wild, wild stories that it gets f-ugly.

Archer brought "us" here...talk to him

Really. Let it die. There, challenge met, as as I said awhile ago...its HERE. It has been. Click my name. Boom.

Now that you have gotten me to do your little dance, meet your challenge...can we refrain from the Special K ad hominem BS..please?

Like all of these other times I asked you...just click the referenced post below:

AGAIN. Please stop calling me this. Let's see how many requests that adds up to...in reverse order:

-K

Ah, here it is!

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4540.msg106604.html#msg106604


Now, they are edits and labeled as such, but you can only do that for so long before the server locks them.

I have given as much as you have.

I laid out my "deal", and you've finally counter-offered.

Still looks like it's a standstill so far.

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi Exx
I was one of the sceptics from the begining, the site I just put up on my last post is me not putting anything on the table to do with FE, just because we can see where something can't work with out having to test it don't mean we are against FE.
Take Care Exx
Graham

[roadstar31148]

i'v been working on a wheel ,,,,but whats thrown me with archers failure to produce a working model is that he changed the design,,and yes i can see the benefits in the new model he was working on,,,,but i thought the 1 third longer arms were the important component that ensured the continual turning of the wheel,,,,,yet on the model he was trying to get going had no extended arms,,,,i dont get it...if he really can do it he should accept some small monitary assistance and regain his credility,,,,,not to just give up ,,,,,,,,,,my moto is NEVER GIVE UP,,,,,,,,

[Rusty_Springs]

i'v been working on a wheel ,,,,but whats thrown me with archers failure to produce a working model is that he changed the design,,and yes i can see the benefits in the new model he was working on,,,,but i thought the 1 third longer arms were the important component that ensured the continual turning of the wheel,,,,,yet on the model he was trying to get going had no extended arms,,,,i dont get it...if he really can do it he should accept some small monitary assistance and regain his credility,,,,,not to just give up ,,,,,,,,,,my moto is NEVER GIVE UP,,,,,,,,

Hi Road
I don't think he will give up, he will just be less public until he really has something to show, if that ever happens.
Take Care Road