Roll on the 20th June

[Evg]

Purepower
First perpetual motion (Needs extra energy to overcome, friction etc.)
Then go on to free energy.
You don?t have to buy it, Archer is giving it away free.
Would I sell my oil shares (if I had any?)
Not quite yet!

[ramset]

YES and and i would let the man thats building it decide what parts HE needs Chet

[tekylife]

Maybe he is talking linear bearings , to better deal with the rods movements.

Time will tell. At least this turn around there is not need to hold our breath.

Now if BATMAN was to come out of  the cave and show his FE device ...

[Rusty_Springs]

 

Sorry Graham, if you felt any offence, but not attacking you.

It is true that I have not shown the wall in/out data. I was only trying to compare the difference between using 1 push and 1 pull magnets to how many pull magnets along or how many push magnets along can do the same movement. To me, the large difference in the pull or push number of magnets along is what creates the insurmountable wall.

I do have some other unsupported data on the wall moving out. When I had the 13 neo setup and manually lifted the test rod and the stop put it at the same height as with the one neo. Then manually pushed pass the wall in both cases, there was a vast difference between the two. As expected by Maxwell's attraction formula.

I will be attempting to add some supportive torque data to show the difference. 

Regards, Larry

Hi Larry
No worries mate I will be looking forward to the torque data.
Take Care Larry
Graham

[exxcomm0n]

@ LarryC

I hope you don't think I am spook or specter.

I just babble with the hope of the achievement  like "1 million monkey with 1 million typewriters will sooner or later type "1 large sausage, 1 small cheese, and breadsticks".

Just waiting for a choice bit of chaos to happen, and I like smashing theories together.

Otherwise, keep at it man!

@ Pure

Dude, that's a great story of simple is better, and outlines a great principle, but it's crap (maybe not if it was the 1st time).

Please don't get offended but I know of a place where that happens a lot.
I've seen it, truthfully.

It's not an overpass, but a small elevated rail bridge spanning a 4 lane one way at the bottom of a hill.
BIG signs and flashing lights warning of 13' 9" clearance (I think a standard freight trailer is 14') and it still happens at least once a year because of 3".

They use (the city garage) a special ramp and take of the tires off (because if they remain on with no air and the trailer moves, it breaks the bead of the tire and you have to take them off anyway), put the hubs on the lower than tire height ramp, pull it out, and fine the freight company heavily.

EDIT
They DO have to deflate the tires quite a bit to unhitch the trailer from the semi since it (the semi) usually is unscathed.


I think it was a garage mechanic trying to save himself some labor that thought of it.
Doesn't say much for truck drivers though, does it?

Even if this wasn't such regular practice, wouldn't be a hell of a lot easier to de-construct the  trailer instead of the roadway?

I have a better than standard understanding of trailers. A good friend of mine has been a trailer mech for about 20yr. now.

He's an "out of box" thinker too.
He was given a trailer that had been in an accident and had a bent frame that no one else in the shop wanted to touch.
He parked it against a thick cinder block wall (maybe it was an earthen ramp for loading and unloading) and then got a forklift..............

.....and started ramming the sides where it (the trailer) was bent with the forklift into the wall.
Finished the job in 1/2 a day I think.

Nobody else had thought of the forklift being a frame straightening tool, only a load/unload tool.



As to Archer's build.......I'm amazed there hasn't been more outrage about the wobble in the shaft.
That would over-balance one side and make the demos perfectly believable to standard theory.

He's replacing that though, so we'll see........

Chit! I gotta figure up a shopping list for tomorrow!