Roll on the 20th June

[mental breakdown]

@ Dgraphic911

Move it again, stick it with the other electric motors for now, until we find out its actually telepathic energy then move it to half baked ideas. Show it or kill it. Get this thread outa here so the rest of us can get back to working on improving the basic building block that all OU will be based on.

It has been quite a while since I looked forward to Santa coming.  Dgraphic911, you post such a bully statement, I am under the distinct impression you've either practiced being an azzhole or are just naturally good at it.  Either way I wish to look forward to June the 20th with the same excitement as I did Santa, if the date comes and Santa doesn't arrive... no problem, I've been an adult for a long time.    You should try it sometime... being an adult I mean.



These forums are filled with numerous dead ends and potential workable concepts.  I would love to know by what authority you speak for all of the individuals working on projects, especially since there is no bonafide working overunity device.  At least by Overunity.com s standards ----->see the the prize section.  And please enlighten me as to what the "basic building blocks over OU will be based on".  Magnetism? Hydrogen? Gravity? Zero Point Energy? ect...

Men In Black, Big Oil cartel, Illuminati, Spooks or whatever you wish to call them will find all sort of ways to try and curtail any advancement that threatens their interests.  You are no different then any of them if you have nothing productive to contribute.  The advancement in all of these areas are part of our natural evolution in the area of innovation.  If Ray Kurzweil's futuristic concepts on The Singularity holds any truth in fact ... our progress in these areas will continue whether a few knuckle dragging apemen beat their chests or not.

To Archer:  Go ahead, keep opening the package piece by piece like a gift should be opened.  I am certain that you (The Mighty Quinn) expect us to "shake the box" every now and then, trying to figure out what's inside.

Good work to Chet and others... I enjoy reading all of your ideas.

Later   

[sm0ky2]

 

Sitting on top of the giant Chas Campbell Wheel replica, theres a much better view from up here

It is true that using a permanent magnet in combination with an electro magnet consumes half as much power as using two electromagnets.

This does not mean that you have 50% extra energy to play with. it just means that you cut your Losses in half.

[b0rg13]

so lets seeeeee..... a rod placed from 1 to 7 and a cheap way to move the iron/or what ever it is... a small way for as less energy as possible, maybe there is an attraction at 1, and the poles are changed at 7 to repel ?, would only need to on for a blink of a sec to move the weight ?, i have no clue really im just spelling it out as i might see it in basic form.

or.. maybe even forget the rod going from 1 to 7 and have it so one a small/short rod of steel or iron(/shrug) is attracted enough to move and put the wheel out of balance so it turns and then at 7 there repelled,....in small but precise movements and the timing might need to ajust as it picks up speed( now im dreaming its picking up SPEED!, so ill stop here).

..../shrug..

[sm0ky2]

we could have a magnetic rod,  and a generation coil from 3 to 7, where it ties into an electromag in repulsion, to kick the rod up so the opposite end is at 1  and starts the cycle over.

or , for simplicity and timing, have several mags around hte wheel, that are passing the coils, at the sme time magnets are passing the electromag, and being repulsed upwards.

so it just stays imbalanced always.

[Tinker]

What Quinn is talking about is a centrifugal gravity, magnetic, device that is self sustaining capable of producing energy without fuel or outside input.

He has not made any claims of OU or send me money.

His history on the internet that some site as a detriment I have not seen any Puff presented of fraud or maleficence or legal action. But as often happens here, PERCEPTION trumps reality,

SOME of what he has stated in his posts and on what he has posted on his website I have verified to be true. excluding his diatribe/about his other issues.

My point here is everyone here should feel free to accept or reject information that they find here without trashing the source .

No one should hold the source accountable for failure of their replication
on information provided by others especially when the replicator varies the paramiters of  the source information .

Quinn has not yet provided us with complete information, Yet some have   dissed his information without Prof when he clearly stated he would present the full text on 20th of June.

Get a grip here, IF the man is not able to substantiate his claims then  he will be labeled as a fool and a charlatan for all to see.

On the other hand might be right.

Be well

Tinker