Roll on the 20th June

[Bulbz]

Yes, I think we are going to see alot more of these guys showing up as the day draws near.  with more people trying to build the wheel, and even a couple who seem to have done it,  there are quite a few oil reps that are starting to get nervous about their future pensions
on a side note, my wheel is progressing along well, but it is 4 feet in size, so it is taking some time to get all the bigger magnets/weight together.  will post video/pics as soon as something cool happens with it.

The oil companies are starting to get nervous about there future pensions ?...

With the amount of money that they have had out of the public over the years, they should already have enough to not worry about their retirement.

[AB Hammer]

exxcomm0n

  Well said!
Even though I have my doubts, I am wiling to wait and see. But wait means I keep to my wheel work. I don't use magnets of any kind. Just Gravity 

[redriderno22]

hello all

Im adding another vid to you tube

no i havent fixed the axle yet, no time today to play just work work work

just more of the vid from the other day

enjoy!

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi All
The only reason I showed my Gem motor is to show even having a electromagnetic motor that use very little current is still hard to make OU, Oh and look at the video to see that its one pulse because the reed switch lights up everytime the electromagnet is turned on.
Commen sence says you can put coils around it and it will generate electricity, you can even use the electromagnet as a generator when its switched off for most off the cycle but its still not OU, I would love it if someone could make it OU, if I used Archer logic I could put coils around it to generate the current for the electromagnet and at the same time run a load on the turning shaft because the coils will cuz no drag so I don't need extra power for my load, going on that logic anyone that looked at my motor were looking at the first free energy machine if it had coils around it to surply the electromagnet with what it needs to keep it spinning, so why are we talking I have done it and I have the plans and video proof to prove it.
Take Care All
Graham

PS oh and thats not the full design, the full design has two rotors side by side with opposite poled overlapping magnet and I use both poles on the electromagnet to kick it across, now I have two disk spinning on the one shaft with the same out from the electromagnet but theres more I have a Fariday copper disk between the two rotors to generate current with out drag.

[capthook]

1st off:
All the praise and respect in the world to those that are building.  Getting your hands dirty and seeing up close and in person what is happening can be rewarding, educational and exciting - as well as frustrating at times.

And as to Archer:
I've said it several times before and I'll say it again -
He deserves credit for having an idea and pursuing it
and for sharing it with others
and most importantly - for inspiring others.

However - the lack of apparent interest (even disdain) to having input that contradicts the "non-Newtonian" "science" often presented in this thread is unhealthy IMO.  This forum has a lot of bright people. It's a great place to learn, be inspired and share ideas - from both sides of the coin.

Can you build a wheel that will turn when pulsed by an electromagnet?  Of course.  Can you make it self-run?  That's the hard part.
The REALLY hard part - and the ultimate goal - is to be able to collect useable, excess power.  Of course, that's why we are here.

So how to make the wheel OU?  Why, collect more power out than in of course!  How to do that?  Attach a means to generate power to the device. 
What kind of generator?  How will it all work together? Umm... we don't know - we are building the wheel...

Ok - but in the process - shouldn't you consider the end goal?

It not only takes a lot of tuning Chet, it takes an infinite amount of tuning, which is why it has never been accomplished. Ever wonder why Archer can't reproduce his 'toy' ant take a short u-tube video just to show everyone he isn't a complete fraud? onesnzeros

The massive amount of BS from Archer doesn't concern you?  Or the fact there is NO evidence of any kind?
Do you REALLY believe he built this two years ago - but destroyed it out of concern for how it will bankrupt the oil producing countries?

For me and others to point out and (attempt to) correct the BS (at least some of it anyway) should be welcomed by all.  Or would you rather keep your eyes and ears closed?  Cheerleaders only welcome?

I was hammering Archer on Lenz's Law (among other things).... Why?  Well - if he doesn't understand this very basic (and important to OU) scientific concept - what are the odds he doesn't understand alot of other important aspects?
And really - ANYONE who had actually BUILT a device that generates electricity would have noticed this effect right away.

And maybe some of the "negative" information presented might inspire a way to solve the presented problem.

And no - I'm not saying don't build.  Just don't quit your job to do it "knowing" it will work.

Just about everyone on this forum hopes you will succeed.

CH