Roll on the 20th June

[spinner]

Archer, I gotta be honest here. Some mean people here made fun of my last post. They must have thought I was being funny - but I am dead serious. But I dont care - they are all stupid. Anyway, I went to your website and I followed exactly your instructions (just trying to understand you bud, my little brain can't follow this sutff)

Here is what you said ...

"Is this scientifically true, yes, This is seen where two equal weights are placed on a fulcrum or wheel (try it at home with your push bike upside down), the first one sitting at 7 o'clock and the second one placed on at one o'clock and let fall, not pushed!!!, the second weight will always go past the point of balance because of momentum, it will eventually rock until it balances, but it will never slowly fall until it becomes level. If there was only M G math it would fall until both balanced, but it has enough to lift the opposing weight past the centre of the wheel and balance point. Now surely the weight of gravity acting upon the 7 o'clock weight should have as much power as that on the right ? But it does not And momentum from fall has always been the true source of free energy."

Now, I followed this exactly. I turned my bicycle upside down I clamped a weight on the wheel at 1:00 and I held the freakn wheel and then I clamped a weight on 7:00 - but the darn thing sat still. WAZZUP with dat! I thought my chane must have felll off or bind it up or sumthin thin I remember I put the weights on the front wheel where nothing touches it. I am big time confused. What am I doing wrong. Please, must be sumthin I am doing wrong cause I followed your website EXACTLY and I am smarter than a monkey!  (I hope). Seriously, Archer correct me before these monkey Newton followers tell me I am stupid or something.  My new wheel I am building is gonna rock! (just need to get past the problem I can't figure out).

Sincerely,
Freddy

What are you doing wrong? Well, you forget to switch Nature in "Archurian mode"... Use Physics 102, Flintstone! Damn, is that so hard?

I like your flushing-toilet FE concept. I'll try it - but to avoid ending in a deep shit, I'll use the other toilet, just for the electricity production (fresh water splushing only).

BTW, I just discovered that Archer's "Egyptian fulcrum" is already in use worldwide! Local high-school has one at the parking-place entrance. And it looks like it is a very sophisticated device - it has NO SMALL WEIGHT! It's a 6:1 lever with a 0:60kg mass (yes, the long beam HAS NO WEIGHT installed)!!! Newton, go home! Archurians WIN!
The maintenance guy explained to me, that the thing is motorised! Yeah, sure...! We all know that the el. motor can work as a generator... This must be the Big Oil suppression, because no one is aware that it actually generates electricity!!!
And for the end - local company which produces and installs those devices is called - BOWMAN!!!
This is incredible! Go Archer!

[greendoor]

Doooodz - when is Ashton Kutcher gonna jump out from that bush and say "you've been punk'd"?  The 20th you reckon?  Or is that really you, John Clarke ... one of nature's true gentlemen?

I come here looking for serious discussion about overunity - but this is more like a social experiment in mental health care ... they say there is a very fine line between genius and madness, because both use their brains more than normal people. 

Archer's own potty mouth displays his mental and spiritual condition.  Nothing good is going to spring up from this particular sewer, folks.  Nothing to see here - move right along now ...

Seriously.  No free-energy breakthrough can come from anyone who does not understand that Energy is not measured in kilograms.  I'm more alarmed at the spectators who are egging him on.  That's just cruel.  (Unless this really is a radio or tv stunt in progress - in which case, try to be even funnier for the sound bites).

Sadly, I fear that Archer genuinely believes his own hype. The blind leading the blind. 

This whole sad episode is a bit like a troll roasting - but in reverse.  The lunatics appear to have taken over the asylum. 

This just taints the genuine efforts of the whole overunity community.  Maybe Archer is a paid spook, to divert attention from the serious projects being worked on by people with a stronger grasp on reality?

I may be an oilman - but I genuinely believe that free-energy exists and must be used.  I want to heat my house and run my car with free energy.  I don't need to be bad-mouthed by a misguided malcontent for daring to question this kind of madness.  I expect i'll be flamed for this - but people! Get a grip! 

[Tracker]

Guys !!! Digg it !!!  Let's make this story popular. Please all DIGG, either you are just a Monkey or True revolutionist.
More people will discuss it, better for everybody.
http://digg.com/general_sciences/OK_people_That_s_it_New_era_of_free_energy_is_coming

[libra_spirit]

Playing with the numbers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lever

According to Newton, if I have this correct, a 5 to 1 distance should balance with 5 to 1 weight ratio on each side.

balance arm weight 29.9 kg

short side arm weight 14.95 kg
long side 14.95 kg

short load 20 kg
long side load .75 kg balanced?

Newtonian calc, lever must be 20 / .75 ratio = 26.6 / 1 for a balance
Yet we see 5 / 1 lifts it to a balanced point?

We are getting nearly the square of the expected lift weight from a lever.
5 to 1 length is lifting about 25 to 1 weight ratio.

Weight ratio of balance arm to load weights 29.9 / 20.75 = 1.44
The square of the arm length ratio plus the balanced to unblanced ratio =
26.44 very close to what we actually observe in the video?

If this is true then the balanced weight is a factor as well as the offbalanced distance squared.

This is radically different then the Newtonian descriptions on the net!
Has anyone actually set up a balance and proven this?
Frankly I am so tired of reading all the "emotional process" I willl have to do this!
I want to see some more real numbers from experiment before taking a side in the heated debate.

Dave L

[dani1]

Archers balanced arm is weight increasing