Roll on the 20th June

[ramset]

onezeros so you say this is slight of hand or trickery that getting 20 units ten feet in the air with one unit can not be done at 5-1  as shown on the video   is the real issue here  5-1 not possible? Chet

[ramset]

or are you saying it can be done[5-1] if the lever has more mass?  Chet

[onesnzeros]

onezeros so you say this is slight of hand or trickery that getting 20 units ten feet in the air with one unit can not be done at 5-1  as shown on the video   is the real issue here  5-1 not possible? Chet

Chet:  it can be done, anyone can do it and it doesn't break and known physical laws. If archer takes the weights off the lever what in your opinion will the lever do? Will it balance or will the long end come crashing down to the ground? The answer is the long end will come crashing to the ground because that is where the hidden weight is, making it only seem like 1kg can lift 20kg with a 5to1 mechanical lever. It is an absolute idiodic stunt.

onesnzeros

[capthook]

The only thing that matters is providing an easily replicable over-unity machine.

You got people interested with your gravity wheel with magnetic assist idea.  It was simple to think about and straightforward to build.  People on these forums are trying to build that device even though you have yet to provide adequate information on how to do so.  I hope they aren't all wasting their time in the efforts.

The reason I worry most about them wasting their time is because you, yourself, have not built such a machine!  Originally you said you were going to then you started going off on wild tangents about levers, siphons, and cursing the world.  None of this has anything to do with the original project to begin.

Dear God man FOCUS!

Build a wheel, video tape it, document it, produce over-unity, and share it with the world.

Archer, just refocus yourself.  Build the wheel.  Not the lever.  Not the siphon. Do not rant, rave, curse, or invite strangers to your house.  Just build the wheel.

My gut told me from the beginning Archer has an idea that he has examined (the ?wheel?).  He built a small device some time ago that showed promise - but just needed some tweaks and a larger scale to 'work'. (like ALL the devices of the past... if only this and that....)
Thus the original adventure - the "upscaling" of the wheel.  I don't believe he EVER had an OU device, or even ever tested it.
His lack of understanding of Lenz Law is enough to prove that.
(among MANY others. An oh - why hasn't anyone EVER commented on his 'state of fact that Lithium Ion batteries are shit, a duracell will outperform it.'  ANYONE with 1/64 of a brain knows a Lithium Ion battery is far superior in energy density  )

Then came the switch to the new device....??
He has recently stated he is now working on both... good!  But, for me, let's see the damn wheel! 

The 'fulcrum' sure is huge!  Credit to Archer for the attempt - for sure!
And now videos!  Way to go Archer!! This is a much better way to convey your ideas - your words rarely convey any useful info.

But the original goal of a reasonably sized device that the average Joe could build is a better one, IMO

jratcliff has voiced an opinion that EXACTLY matches mine - and I assume - many others.....

The wheel concept may have some merit - Let's see some videos of the wheel!

[ramset]

onezeros so what you are saying {not being a wise guy here ]  is there is no advantage in a machine   doing more work with a shorter lever?   or more work done with less effort ?
@one zeros please respond   when you say the extra weight is needed you sound like Archers claim that   this is why he can do more work with less imput because the extra falling mass allows him to do this   im not talking about anything but   effort    in    work    out    Chet oh well back to work