Roll on the 20th June

[ramset]

pure power thanks for the vid I cant hear the audio at the library [working out of town no service where im staying]  youve cantalevered the load on the short side way more  it appears than Archer does I see your hand saying 5-1 this does not appear accurate  in the screen shot I will have to go back to the archer vid to see if his pick for the load is back this far from control rods   I seem to remember Archer saying something about removing the final control rod altogether and having his tuning where he wanted it   the empty tubes that held these rods at the end [during tuning] do they still have heavy weights inside ? chet
EVG good request that is supposed to be a unique spot

[exxcomm0n]

@exxcomm0n

You say:

"But since this is a argument of science and not faith..."

Do you see the irony in your statement? This, coming from a guy who so adamantly supports AQ for no reasons other than faith...

Different types of batteries serve different purposes. Some are better for fast discharge, some are better for their charge density, some are better for deep cycle... Really, the "best" battery depends on the application. Lithium ion and lithium polymer batteries are better for cars for a number of reasons. First, you get a lot more stored energy for the weight and size, obvious benefits for a vehicle. Second, it doesnt have the "memory" effects of other rechargeable batteries, so it will last through many more cycles. Third, and this applies to hybrid vehicles mostly, is they do not require deep cycles. In a hybrid vehicle, the battery is continuously discharged and recharged. Lithium batteries handle this load type best.

@ PureP

I DO NOT BELIEVE ARCHER IS THE NEW MESSIAH!
EDIT:
The funny thing is that those who are opposed are doing it with the zeal of the inquisition.
Now, that was a fine example of truth and honesty, wasn't it?

Let's see.......started in 1478 and wikipedia shows it being abolished in 1834.

But that was the truth of the day. It was written in books, it had authorities that defined it's parameters, and it kept "new" thought at a standstill in Catholic/Protestant Europe during that time.

.......and I stand as a "warlock" today because I believe that Archer has the right to fail or succeed in the time he stated.
I think that's at least  the 15th time I've written that particular sentiment in this thread.
:END EDIT

I do believe he should have the time he proposed to furnish the device he claimed.
Go back and look, really.

I made the parameters of the test.

Rise to it or please shut up.

This was not a vehicle challenge (unless you got an electric car handy), don't make it out to be one.

EDIT:
By the way (since I'm watching your video), COULD YOU PLEASE SHOW ME WHERE IN HIS VIDEO THE CONTROL ARMS REACH OUT FARTHER THAN THE END OF THE FULCRUM?

Is ti in the picture proof you used?
I saw them, but not extending anywhere near the length of your "control arm".
I'm hoping the 4th time asking might work.

[ramset]

Spinner  Grandma used to say' whats for yah ne're go by yah'
however to me she also said 'Dont confuse me with the facts   my mind is already made up'     Chet

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi all
I was always into FE but I have leant something from this thread that makes me think maybe science was right and it can't be done except through wind water or sun, I alway thought that magnets would do it and I came up with a motor setup that makes a permanent magnet setup work no different to an electromagnetic setup but while I was testing I learnt something I didn't know and this goes to Archers wheel to, what I learnt may not be new to some people but it was to me and thats magnets react different with a load, I was testing a distance theory with my Trigate, I had the roller go through the gate, then I let it go through the gate at the same distance with a load and it didn't move so I thought the load was to heavy but I moved the stators in and it moved again like it did with out the load, this showed me distance matters with magnet and if I set a system up to spin once I add a load to it it will stop because the distance was set for no load so I need to move the magnets in to have it work again for that load and heres where I come to Archers wheel, Now I have said it may spin if setup perfect weight to magnetic force and if you add a load it will stop, now not only weight and friction will stop it but the magnets will to, why because the distance needs to be perfect to have it spin and once a load goes on the distance changes like I have said so now it will stop, it will loss its push pull because it to far away, to change that you have to move the stator magnets in for the load.
Time will tell and as yet we havn't even seen it spin but for it to spin everything has to be perfect and thats why I can't see it happening.
Take Care All
Graham

[ramset]

PURE POWER I just looked at ARCHERS vid again there are NO CONTROL RODS the pick is four or so inches in from the end    I want your help to understand why his claim of   1  unit in  20  units out on a 5-1  lever means nothing in doing work   are you saying this claim is not true   or are you saying so what I can do that better  Chet