Roll on the 20th June

[exxcomm0n]

Hi all

@Archer

Thank you for your work and effort, when sharing them you have demonstrated which is the true road and the spirit of the free energy.
If it works or it doesn't work before or after June 20, this doesn't really care. The important thing is the ideas and the shared knowledge.

I prefer their explanations difficult to understand for me for my low english level before the brilliant patents lacks of data and very difficult or impossible of replicate. It is noticed that you are a very hard-working person, although the methodology is a little 'different.'

Thank you Archer, good work and Happy Birthday for the 20



Regards, Hhx

Amen.
(Since this is seen as something bordering on religious fervor.)

[LarryC]

I think the idea is a "ramp" effect, as used in about any other magnetic effect motor I've ever seen.

Instead of building a high wall from the git-go, making a series of graduating walls so you can jump from the top of one to the next, So when you get to the "high point" you can use the "banked" effect you created getting to that point.

Are you meaning stacked like this:

NNNNNNNNNNNN
      NNNNNNNNN
             NNNNNN
                   NNN

Thanks, Larry

[Newtonian God]

@MR KAI : Your website snapshot never existed ! 

It looks like Archer is back to his previous release schedule. Maybe he managed to smooth out the run and strengthen the wheel with his skills.

On again, off again, the score still remains the same:

Newton 1, Archer 0

--
Newtonian God
"You can believe in perpetual motion and be thought a fool, or you can believe in Archer Quinn and remove all doubt."

[Xaverius]

@ Spinner,

               Thanx for the input, your concepts are accurate.  More specifically, my curiosity surrounds the properties of an electromagnet. If the coil of an electromagnet uses 100 watts of power and only one pole is coupled to a rotor magnet, a force of X units is applied between the poles of the rotor and stator.  With the components optimized, the output would be 100 watts of mechanical power output (neglecting of course some small losses).  If 100 watts input produces X units of force on one pole then that same 100 watts input would produce X units of force on the opposite pole.  That X units of force on the opposite pole, between the pole and a rotor magnet should produce  100 watts of mechanical output power(neglecting losses).

                 If this electromagnet was configured in a horseshoe shape, both rotors could be mounted on the same axle, one oriented toward the N pole and one oriented with the S pole.  Total power:  Input=100W  Output=200W.  As most of you well know, conventional motors are not configured that way.  Of course I have not taken into account the effects of CounterElectromotive Force, or any other unforeseen anomalies.  Does anyone else have any ideas about this?  Thanx in advance.


        Power to the Anti-Sheeple!!

[MrKai]

For someone that gets mega-uptight when someone "mis-quotes them", you have this horrid way of doing that yourself.

(The actual post of mine was to spinner when he accused anyone talking as if this would have a chance, to NOT have the sufficient education and how we needed much more hard science teaching to even think doing so, and mispelled while doing it.

My quote was, "...And you might have learned how to spell." Since he was on the education bashing horse I thought it fair to point out that he misspelled "Archet" and something else in his tirade.)

You thought it a "weak" come back. I thought it a very keen insight into someone bashing about education.

If you would spend a bit less time trying to goad me you would not keep rephrasing what I say/type and making false attributions:

I didn't SAY that YOU SPECIFICALLY SAID: "Oh YEAH, well you can't even SPELL"...it is a simile.

I SAID that you have resorted to attacking people that misspell (or in the case of "Archet"..more like mistype).

That's one of the many diffs between you, me and honest discourse

Read it again, as you like to say. Re-phrasing and re-framing arguments is a classic weasel move. I'm well aware of it.

And again, none of this changes the facts or the validity of anything I've said. This one lil' nagging detail ya just cant't seem to work with/deal with.

I'm not sure why you seem to think its your job or duty to "goof" on me, but no matter. Archer's shit still doesn't work like he said it would, he misrepresented himself, his progress, his process and his success...and no matter how much name-calling any of you do...no matter how much you prostrate yourselves before this man, I will still be here until Harti deems otherwise to make sure THIS particular person's claims on THIS particular project in THIS particular thread are examined and critiqued in a proper rational way, with the evidence presented.

You go to another thread and Praise Archer (I'd find it hard to believe there isn't at least another...but I haven't looked) and you won't find me there.

If anyone here makes any broad baseless claims that leak out of here onto the OtherWebs and I come across it, I'll be all in that, too.

But for now, as long as anyone stumbling into this saga gets a more balanced view of this particular person's claims, counterclaims and foolishness, I am satisfied.