Roll on the 20th June

[Mark69]

Hey Graham, I would like to see your motors.  You are saying you have achieved free energy with these?  Have you ever tried to hook up a generator to one of the motors to see if it would spin it?

Mark

Oh I get it now "Archer logic", so it doesnt produce FE.....

[Rusty_Springs]

Hey Graham, I would like to see your motors.  You are saying you have achieved free energy with these?  Have you ever tried to hook up a generator to one of the motors to see if it would spin it?

Mark

Oh I get it now "Archer logic", so it doesnt produce FE.....

Hi Mark
Heres the site, look at the abovegemmotor video at the begining you will see how it reacts with out the electromagnet on, then with it on, you will know its on because you will see the read switch light up.
This uses 2 volts and its made with basic stuff I made the electromagnet so its not the best it could be, maybe if I could have a good electromagnet made and make it so while the electromagnet is off the coil becomes a generator going to the battery to give some back it may selfrun but it would have to be designed well for that and I don't know enough about electronics to do that.
http://www.fdp.nu/shared/manager.asp?d=files\Graham%20Clarke\Gem%20motor\
Take Care MArk
Graham

[purepower]

Evg: Retroactive Continuity. He is attempting to change the past to fit the present. He says:

"Think logic.

A guy comes up to you 6 months ago, and says i can beat thermodynamics, you laugh and say how?

He says I can take a perfectly balanced wheel and make it self strt and accelerate, i havent iron out all the kinks to keep it going but i have managed to get it to produce more energy out than in."

The thing is...that's not what happened. At all. Sigh. I have his original website cached and nowhere does he present himself as theorizing ANYTHING.

Then he sort of tries to claim thru a very...interesting...causation/correlation fallacy that his failure was a success and proves the law of conservation false via some VERY bunk (but familiar) semantics.

So it appears he certainly isn't giving up. Still attacking physics, anyway.

Sigh.

-K

All very true. Just to add to it, FE is not a measure of distance as Archer suggests. I can have a wheel with a single fixed mass at the outer edge, move this mass to exactly the 12 position, move it a single millimeter, and the whole thing would rotate almost a full rotation. Id give it a lil nudge, and it would accelerate 'magically' producing more energy out that in. Is this FE? No, but still more impressive than Archer's wheel. Why isnt this FE? Because the real energy in was the initial placement of the weight at 12...

One other thing that no one has seemed to mention is that Archer claimed from the beginning that the wheel could be constructed from the most crude of a materials and precision in construction was not important, yet he is now claiming that this is why he missed his deadline and the wheel doesnt work...

A guy comes up to you 6 months ago, and says... I can take a perfectly balanced wheel and make it self strt and accelerate, i havent iron out all the kinks to keep it going but i have managed to get it to produce more energy out than in.

In my opinion, this is Archer trying to recount our first encounter with him and the SoG.

If this is the case, I am deeply saddened to see the confession "i havent iron out all the kinks to keep it going."

This was not the impression I had, nor anyone had. He sold us all on the idea he had already created a FE wheel that was self-resetting and produced continuous FE. This is obviously not the case.

By Archer's definition of FE, I too have created a 'functioning' device. Please see example above. It has more 'energy' out than in, but I "havent iron out all the kinks to keep it going..."

Catch my drift?..

-PurePower

[Fred Flintstone]

@ARCHER - The Eskimo Quinn

I took up for you. I put my neck on the line. I believed in you. I told others about you. You have only two options left to gain my respect.

1. Tell the world that you do not know how to make a perpetual motion wheel. I will forgive you and so will many.
2. Show us a working wheel.

There is NOTHING - ABSOLUTELY NOTHING - that you can put on your website other than the above two options that make any difference. Video 6 does not prove anything. I built a wheel that does exactly what yours does, but it will never keep spinning. Your wheel has to spin on its own *INDEFINETLY*. Nothing else is proof. You must apologize to all of us to make this right.

I hope in my heart that you "thought" you could produce a working wheel and you did not intentially mislead us. Please, admit your mistake and move on.

Sincerely,
Freddy

[Fred Flintstone]

@BATMAN

You have presented us with clues that you have some sort of free energy device. What is the deal?  Why do you want to start playing another game like Archer? This is very silly and childish. If you have a free energy device that works, why not just tell us what it is and what it does? Patent it if you want. Hold out details if you want. But at least tell us what it can do?  There are millions of people that are waiting for a solution to the energy crisis. Each day that is wasted playing games allows more suffering. Leave Batgirl alone for a few minutes and post your videos.

Freddy