Roll on the 20th June

[shakman]

ERS: Nobody is infallible.

Speak for yourself buddy 
Hehe

[ramset]

evil   what university are you comparing this research to   id like to look in on some  so I can compare their protocol on gravity wheels and such  Thanks Chet

[exxcomm0n]

Hi mscoffman,

I'm being presumptuous and responding to a post not directed at me, but in reading your post it made me wonder about a few things.

Archer;

While I respect what you are doing, you are generally wrong about what an engineer does. He may use his intuition and fantasy
to set the overall goals of his project but he very much uses equations and mathematics and the principles of science to implement
a design.

Then he has to create new math variables to explain a previously undocumented process as it has no set previously established mathematic principle, doesn't he?

Also, fantasy is a dangerous word (since it seems to imply dragons and castles and fairy tales). Could you use "imagination" instead in the future perhaps?

In fact in that way he is an accountant. We go over an over a design untill we assure ourselves that we understand
each and every bit from every angle before anything is built, this is why people are so critical of any errors in thinking. I've completed
many personal  projects and have done engineering design with each one and have been successfully reached goals almost 100%
of the time.

I know many an engineer that would spit on the ground should you liken them to an accountant. While you may be comfortable with that analogy, I think others might beg to differ.

This is very different thing from what you are doing. It has to be, because obviously you can not use design equations to do the
"impossible" or implement fantasy directly. This is why it is so important that you do what you are doing publically. Once there
is an operational model for a unit, then us accountants will complete the design equations and computer optimisations to really
understand and apply this discovery under all sorts of conditions. The design equations become the tools to understanding the
operation of the unit. So let some folks help you with the theoretical aspects of this by doing it publically

The computer optimizations might be an issue unless you are a programmer as well as an engineer.
Program structure is usually based on accepted principles and cannot deal appropriately with a process that it has no set definition of, so how might that be accomplished please?

I already have developed a significant theory as to why the Newtonian Theoriests may be in trouble with this wheel relative
to CoE Conservation of Energy. But I need the scratch. Please finish or fail to finish this unit publically, but please do not,
leave us in a hanging state.  Thanks in advance...I keep expecting bad project trajectories but you seem to continually be
demonstrating the better angels of humanity.

S:MarkSCoffman

I believe he already has "failed" it once by not making his self imposed deadline.

But like any good inventor he does recognize that no success usually comes without failure. He seems to be documenting the permanent magnet design in a step by step fashion (and this is why your statement of "hanging state" puzzles me).

Since you are an engineer, and seem to have taken a bit of time in looking into this concept, what is your take (opinion) on its processes so far please?

[shakman]

Hello all. I hope my American friends have enjoyed their 4th July long weekend so far. It's already Monday here. The weekend is over. 

Interesting update on Archer's site last night (Aussie time):

"Have completed specialty shunt tests for the wheel, the shunts have proved so powerful I have no reservations whatsoever as to the design using permanent mags being as good or better than the original electro mag. I will assemble these onto the wheel over the next few days to show you the power of these on the wheel.  This new shunt design leaves every video you have ever seen in the dust."

Should be interesting. Can't wait to see the new vid.

shakman

[The Eskimo Quinn]

Hope to have a vid to show you how powerful the new shunt/train is, this not only runs, but it runs uphill, and wait for it, the heavier it is the easier it runs, I will show you the same track with increasing upper mags and weights in one uninterupted shot, I really have discovered the key to gates and shunts whilst building the wheel, so powerful is it, that it could likely run a car upscaled.

No smot in history ever worked because you could not run magnetic carriages or balls uphill with the magnets,   only momentum.

Until now.

This is probably June 20 for every smot builder that ever lived. For it means if it goes uphill on its own, it will roll down.

Oh and unlike every other device of this kind ever built, there are no sidegates for cornering.

Prepare to see it live on youtube in one hour.

Give me the math for this.

Oh and no we wont be using baby 10gram weights, we will be using ball busting wheel turning power generating mindblowing motherfuckers