Roll on the 20th June

[Newtonian God]

Ironic isn't it. And please stop insulting like...the entire community. There's free speech and there's being an asshole. If you like sucking newtons dick so much why don't you go to a physics forum where people will embrace you as a real hero. You're not wanted here!

Broli, perhaps you missed my earlier post. Here it is again:

Archer, I have a machine shop and I will build it for you for free and give you 100% credit for the work. This is no joke! I have state of the art equipment. Just give me some plans to work up the cad-cam files. Hell, I can video stream the build to you live as it happens.

What is your problem broli, I am willing to finance the whole damn build? All I need is a set of plans from Archer so I can build it for him.

[dirt diggler]

@Mr M

Sorry, but I must disagree. I'm not wasting my time, I rather enjoy helping people. I'm sorry you can understand or appreciate that. Just because I contradict one (or many) of AQs statements dies not mean I intend to contradict his efforts. I'm just here to "clean up the trash."

@Exx

Hm, that sure was an easy way out. How bout you just show to energy equations, one for the vertiacl lift and one for the ramp lift. Include friction and "ramp bank contribution." Then enter values and calculate input energy, less the "banked energy contribution." No need to make a video for the construction of the ramp, just show us you pulling the block up a ramp to verify the calculations are correct.

And before I hear "ooo, that's to hard power" try explaining the contribution factor in Architian rant format.

Oh, and a 1:1 pulley is a string that goes up, over and back down a pulley once. No tricks, that's why I said to use this system.

And what was this unanswered question? Must have missed it.

My energy calculations a perfect and describe the ramp system with 100% accuracy. Calculated, tested, and true. Real life. In practice. Newtonian. And the funny thing is, there is no "banked ramp energy!"

If you really want to use this arguement, then I will use it against you.

Even if AQ gets a wheel turning past a couple cycles from rest, then there is no FE! If it is able to do this, then the energy we are seeing must be the "banked wheel energy" from the past few weeks of construction!

Here's another little something to construct that should use your banked energy wonder. Build a circular ramp with a sudden drop back to the start. The ramp has "banked energy" to help up a ball on the track, right? So try it! The ball should drop, use its kenetic energy plus the "banked" energy to go back up! Perpetual Motion! Solved by Exx's "ramp battery!"

Tell me, why wint this work? It uses your "properties" and principals. Hmm?

-PurePower

PurePower;

I hope I'm not out of line in geting in on your "spiff" with Ex.
But for the "banked energy" thing to work, as I believe it does, then you can't use a pulley system, as it is a tool, tha would also take advantage of "banked" energy.
If you could, please run the math for pushing a wheelbarrow with 50 lbs sand in it, up a 2x12 plank, over a 6 foot wall and back down the other side, then work the math for pushing the same wheelbarrow upto the wall, scooping out the 50lbs sand with your hands, and moving the entire thing to the other side.  then do it 10 times in a row.
Still the same energy used in both cases?
Nope, didn't think so.

ciao, Dirt

[PwrDream]

Ok... I've been out of the loop for a while on this forum... and being the time efficient person that I am, I was hoping someone could give me the cliff notes version of where Archer is at on this project?

Has he succeeded in building a working model? 

If so, has he also succeded in creating easy to understand plans for the general public so that his creation can be reproduced?

...I don't want to waste anyone's time, so short answers will do.


Thanks,

PwrDream

[OU-812]

Ok... I've been out of the loop for a while on this forum... and being the time efficient person that I am, I was hoping someone could give me the cliff notes version of where Archer is at on this project?

Has he succeeded in building a working model? 

If so, has he also succeded in creating easy to understand plans for the general public so that his creation can be reproduced?

...I don't want to waste anyone's time, so short answers will do.


Thanks,

PwrDream

no


no

[PwrDream]

no


no

Thanks for the quick response to my question!

Now that I'm fully up to date on the situation, I'd like to take a 2 question poll in this forum (optional, of course).

If you feel like voicing a response to this question, great!  If not, I totally understand.


THE SIMPLE YES/NO QUESTION TO EVERYONE WHO HAS BEEN FOLLOWING THIS FORUM POST:

Question 1: (Yes or No)
"Would you personally like to see Archer succeed in his quest?"

Question 2: (Yes or No)
"After viewing all of the information on Archers site, as well as all of the postings here, in your personal opinion, do you think that Archer will ultimately succeed in creating a useful power generating device that can easily be replicated?"

I understand that this is a post that is to be used to discuss the actual invention/creation, and not a debate forum to discuss personal feelings.  However, that being said, I have seen plenty of people get into heated debates over this discussion, and I'd like to know where everyone's faith currently lies.

Feel free to follow your short YES/NO answer with any statement you like.

Thanks,

PwrDream