Roll on the 20th June

[sm0ky2]

seems like a cross between the wheel and the mayernik array,

@archer,


i had to go back and re-visit the mayernick. it's been a couple yrs and i had forgotten what exactly that was.
i can't seem to see the correlation. the magnets in the mayernick appear to be driving the rotor in a circular path, similar to a smot/triforce, just with a different type of set-up.

what i have here, is the closest thing i could come up with based on your original (toy sized, w/o electromag) design, based off of information you provided on various different forums/msg groups
it looks funny compared to what you showed, mostly because i started out with rectangle magnets, and its made of wood....
and im using a custom designed Exxo-Bearing instead of tubes.
but the basic premise is the same. ( at least as i interpreted it at the time).

the outer arrays just slide the rod diagonally in a 7:30 to 2:30 direction causing clockwise rotation. but it works just as good the other way. the first time i got it working it was running counterlcockwise.

Gravity is whats pulling on this thing. i can lock the rods in their center position and show that the magnetic field doesn't provide a rotational force. there's a "bubble" at the top - like a second field but its just break in and kick out with equal force like any standard field, looks like a little "kick out" when it leaves, but theres also a "slowing" when it enters that bubble. its just at the top end of the array and what ive discerned from tests is that there is no real effect from it. more of a defect i cant seem to get rid of.
so theres no gain from the magnets themselves in terms of "turning the wheel".

its simply a matter of:

[Sm0ky2's Magneto-Gravitic Theory, Chapter 1, page 3, first paragraph.]

"The force of gravity imparted on a mass at a given height is different than the force between two repelling magnets lifting the same mass the same height......"

[t.w.i.m.c. : you can quote that when you put that in the physics books]


and before anyone starts to rant on that last piece.
That is my gift to you. my books are for me. im not on some profiteering LT/Steorn/Bendini kick. My dreams are much larger than material assets. provided i live long enough, i intent to change our understanding of the world around us, steering the theories of quantum mechanics out of a probilistic mayhem and into a deterministic reality. Immortality of the likes of Archimedes, Albert Einstein, Edvards Liedskalniņš. And Changing the future of mankind.
and no you cant have a copy, im at least several decades from completion.

[markdansie]

@Smokey2
I understand the problems of time. I have been interstate for a few days and am now in New Zealand till Monday so my progress is slow.
Thanks for the update. Interesting last post you made.
Let me know if yoiu get it running again
Kind Regards
Mark

[ramset]

smOkey2
Quote:
and before anyone starts to rant on that last piece.
That is my gift to you. my books are for me. im not on some profiteering LT/Steorn/Bendini kick. My dreams are much larger than material assets. provided i live long enough, i intent to change our understanding of the world around us, steering the theories of quantum mechanics out of a probilistic mayhem and into a deterministic reality. Immortality of the likes of Archimedes, Albert Einstein, Edvards Liedskalniņš. And Changing the future of mankind.
and no you cant have a copy, im at least several decades from completion.

---------------------------------
NICE!!
Good to have goals!

Chet
Ps
Also nice to see "The Boss"[Mr. Quinn]

[sm0ky2]

@Smokey2
I understand the problems of time. I have been interstate for a few days and am now in New Zealand till Monday so my progress is slow.
Thanks for the update. Interesting last post you made.
Let me know if yoiu get it running again
Kind Regards
Mark

its not really a matter of "if". but when.  the concept has been proven, not only by the original inventor (thank you Mr. Qiunn!) but also by myself and at least 1 other replicator.

i still have hopes to get my original build back into operational status, but i also recognize the need to rebuilt this into a more durable (permanent) design. One way or another, this will become a permanent addition to my collection of Toys.

and i say toy with emphasis, because i strongly feel that for this to be anything other than a toy, it needs to be of Archurian proportion and size. which quite frankly is rediculous....
no offense intended archer, but thats the way i feel about it. and i think you yourself mentioned something along that line way back when. took me a couple of yrs, but i understand now what you meant by that.

[markdansie]

Hi Smokey2,
I am writing this from NZ where they are really ito wind and hydo
I did not infer anythingwith the word if...sorry. I think I know what you mean with the size. However there is more to the breakthrough to show it is possible.
Kind Regards
Mark