Roll on the 20th June

[Airstriker]

Just a few questions to you Archer, cause I'm new to the subject:
- Did you publish any working device video on 20th June ?
- Do you have a working unit ?

If you say NO to these questions... why to continue this nonsense ?

Also I've looked through many pages of this thread but couldn't find any working video of yours on youtube ? Why did you remove them or why were they removed ? If they were removed why don't you put them again on any other video site ?

And the last question - what is the address of your web site ? Is it down ? Why ?

[ramset]

Air
Smokey ran it for 3 hours [something based on Archer's work and others from this thread]
Had a few issues and is doing a rebuild.

Chill Bro, you sound a little "TESTY".

Chet

[sm0ky2]

..and that is the centrifugal force forcing the rod outward toward the arc...

i had considered this, only briefly, because the RPM so was low this force was negligible.

..that is because the wall at 7 o'clock is repulsion, we need to change it to attraction..

this is somewhat achieved by the entry-angle, as i attemepted to describe before. The boundary of the field domain helps to bring the arm towards the array, then switches as the rod is forced away from the repulsion barrier. This is "assisted" by the attraction of the upper array, and the reason the upper array is smaller than the lower array, in my replication.

...a falling object will produce more energy than it takes to lift the identical object the same height..

This is due to the time factor. The gravitational acceleration is exponential with time, while the force from the magnetic field decreases exponentially with distance, irrespective of time.

regardless of how long it takes for the rod to transition, the energy gained from the fall (momentum) is greater than the energy required to perform the "lift".

..momentum, created by a shifting rod that cost almost nothing to shift compared to the outpout gained..

when the operational conditions exist,  the leveraged gravity will pull the arm out of the array, prior to the wheel gaining momentum. This is observed by positioning the arm just "after" the rod fires, while the wheel is motionless, then letting it go.
when the wheel is moving, this is not as easily observed, because the momentum has already been established.
Momentum is the gain, which allows the process to repeat itself (break the wall, and possibly provide extractable energy), but it is not the condition which allows the operation to initially occur.

This condition is the difference between the magnetic lift, and the leveraged graviational fall. This imbalance of forces is key to the devices operation. If the forces were the (mostly) equal, the rod would only transition partially, and stop, and gravity would hang the wheel with the rod inside the magnetic array. Those of you replicating it will see this occur when things are not properly calibrated. Don't let that discourage you, it is simply a matter of increasing leverage ( or moving the array further away from the rod ends) to fix that problem.

[sm0ky2]

Just a few questions to you Archer, cause I'm new to the subject:
- Did you publish any working device video on 20th June ?
- Do you have a working unit ?

If you say NO to these questions... why to continue this nonsense ?

Also I've looked through many pages of this thread but couldn't find any working video of yours on youtube ? Why did you remove them or why were they removed ? If they were removed why don't you put them again on any other video site ?

And the last question - what is the address of your web site ? Is it down ? Why ?

@AirStriker

i can't answer that last question, i am as equally frustrated about what happened as anyone else. i have my thoughts as to why he behaved the way he did, but they are just that. i'll let archer explain his actions, if he so chooses. it really doesnt matter, its like asking the enraged husband "why" he smashed the plate against the wall when he was arguing with his wife over doing the dishes....

Reading this thread in its entirety is almost impossible. And even if you did, a great deal of information was given to us across a few other message boards, which no longer exist.

When archer says things, i know it "sounds like" nonsense. this is because his mind does not work the same as yours (or most other peoples for that matter...).  To understand what he is saying, you have to let go of your previously concieved notions of newtonian physics. And apply your logic to the examples and tests he sets before you.  When he says things like "Newton was wrong", i think it would be more accurate to state that Newton was "incomplete".

The difference between a Theory and a Law, is only that mainstream science has been unable to disprove the latter. This does not mean than these "laws" are any less theoretical.
At the current point of my own education, there are very few "laws" that remain unbroken. Lenze/Lorentz' laws concerning the forces of electromagnetic induction are about all that is left. and (pending further investigation) there may be a loophole even to those....  I would argue that all that we think we know about the physical world around us, is next to nothing in perspective to a true understanding of "everything".

You must have patience.
It took me a couple of years of reading, re-reading, watching, and paying close attention to what has taken place for me to realize that 85% of what Archer Quinn teaches us, is 100% correct, when it is applied in the way that he presents it. It is hard to understand, because we allow our previous knowledge to stand in the way of learning. Once you come to realize that physics is incomplete, you allow room in your brain to absorb new information.

Isaac Newton was an observer, as was Einstein, philoponus, galileo . They took what they saw, and described it to the world in a way that is easily understood by everyone.

Archer Quinn is a logician, as was Archemedes, and Da Vinci.
People like this see things in a way that makes sense only to them.
And they make their best attempt to relate this knowledge in a way that the rest of us can understand. I would imagine that this is a difficult task.

The fact that he has created a working gravity wheel (verified and replicated at least twice), and that he goes out of his way to share this with the world, makes him a truly exceptional person.

As far as the original June 20, 2008 deadline...  This was a self-defeated prophecy, set on by "biting off more than one can chew".

[Airstriker]

The fact that he has created a working gravity wheel (verified and replicated at least twice), and that he goes out of his way to share this with the world, makes him a truly exceptional person.

Ok, that's the reall question of mine. Where can I see this gravity wheel ? Any videos, schemes etc ? Who has replicated it and also where can I find it ? If it's confirmed, shouldn't it be placed on the main page of this forum saying "THIS IS IT - BUILD IT!" ??