Roll on the 20th June

[The Eskimo Quinn]

AS far as rod go, i am pretty sure most inkjet printers are steel rods, and no good anyway. as for size, it was prety much toy sized originally, the only variance i guess is it is harder to use the perm mag setup in place ofthe electro magnet at seven due to weight restrictions over magnetic field strength..

as you can see the site is toast along with my mail, but i was nowhere near the bandwidth, i checked, only ran up 45 gig and i have a limit of 15000 gig, cant get hold of the server admin either. no matter i will simply dump the download to multiple sites as an attachment after i send yaz a copy.

having lots of trouble posting here too, as soon as everything is right to go i will get done from a net cafe, i will make sure the download has 2 parts, video and drawings.

good luck and see you soon, (well at least you will see me soon)

[spider4re]

AS far as rod go, i am pretty sure most inkjet printers are steel rods, and no good anyway. as for size, it was prety much toy sized originally, the only variance i guess is it is harder to use the perm mag setup in place ofthe electro magnet at seven due to weight restrictions over magnetic field strength..

as you can see the site is toast along with my mail, but i was nowhere near the bandwidth, i checked, only ran up 45 gig and i have a limit of 15000 gig, cant get hold of the server admin either. no matter i will simply dump the download to multiple sites as an attachment after i send yaz a copy.

having lots of trouble posting here too, as soon as everything is right to go i will get done from a net cafe, i will make sure the download has 2 parts, video and drawings.

good luck and see you soon, (well at least you will see me soon)

Will the video show the unit working?

[queue]

as you can see the site is toast along with my mail, but i was nowhere near the bandwidth, i checked, only ran up 45 gig and i have a limit of 15000 gig, cant get hold of the server admin either. no matter i will simply dump the download to multiple sites as an attachment after i send yaz a copy.

Where can we write to you then ? .. . . i wrote to your domain email address . but assume you didn't get it. i might be able to help you out with some free site hosting .. if you're interested that is .. put an email address where i can write to you.

i find it odd that your email would get cut too. Usually big ISP's only cut off email services when you don't pay your accounts. Thats how we operate anyway.

i hope, as many here probably do that your stuff is real ... the energy world needs to change  .. even if it's going to be painfull for some and effect everybody and everything.

Cheers
Q continuum

[zerotensor]

...
but maths is maths right??

200 kgs over 1 square meter is the same downward pressure as 200kgs over half a square metre right?? i mean the downward presure is still the same as if on a wheel with small or large padlles to sit it on right?? come one guys, you have spat these figures at me for a fucking week, 200 kgs down is 200 kgs down right? what abot over 6 inches square??

Definition:  pressure = force / area.
that is, the pressure is directly related to the force, and inversely related to the area.

200 kg over 1 square meter = 200 kg / m².
200 kg over 1/2 a square meter = 400 kg / m².
Same mass over 6 square inches -- even greater pressure.

You are a chef,  so you know from experience that a good sharp knife works a lot better than a dull one.  The edge of the knife creates a small surface area over which the force acts.  If  "200 kg down is 200 kg down" as you say, then there would be no reason to ever sharpen your knife, as a dull one with the same mass would perform just as well.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

try this, a box with 200 kgs in it , tie a rope to the front of it and pull, bet you cant move it, now tilt the box onto one edge and i bet you can move it, same weight??? same psi pressure??? but less surface area of friction. all the math in the world cannot beat physics in the real world.

Not the same pressure, Eskimo.  Much greater pressure, actually.  But right, less surface area for friction.  Sometimes greater pressure will deform the material in such a way as to lessen the friction even further.  Think ice skates.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

worlds tallest buildings, sway yes?? put them in a windproof vacum, still sway?? actaully they do, why??? and newton never even wrote of this ever. planetary rotation, there are many things that are not some magic, are not some breach of physics, just simple physics we accep[t everyday, that affects things that according to newtonian math should not be affected.

Actually, using Newtonian mechanics you can predict the behavior of a Foucault pendulum in vacuum quite well.  It's not hard to add-in air resistance, either.  Similarly, knowing the material properties of the skyscraper one could calculate the sway.

The planet's rotation causes an apparent alteration of ballistic trajectories.  A weight dropped from the top center of a perfectly vertical shaft will land a bit to one side of the bottom center.  This can all be worked-out with standard mechanics.  These kind of effects are generically called "Coriolis forces", and have an opposite handedness in the North- and South- hemispheres.  This led to a notable error by the British Navy when they invaded the Falkland Islands.  Their guns were callibrated for the northern hemisphere, so they were off-target by twice the coriolis correction, and missed their targets by a country mile.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

like the example of the two identical pieces of tube on the up yours page acting differenty in exactly the same circumstances and environment, ever see that before, where position alone changes physics? course you have a vertical pin or a horizotal pin on the meniscus of a glass of water, one floats the other sinks.

For the vertical pin, the surface area is much less, so the pressure is therefore much greater.  Great enough to overcome the surface tension of the water, so it penetrates the meniscus and sinks.  For the horizontal pin, the pressure is less because the surface area of contact is greater.  The pressure is not great enough to overcome the surface tension, so it floats.  If you add a drop of soap to the water, the surface tension is reduced and the pin falls to the bottom.  This is easily handled by standard physics.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

to leran you must live, and observe the evryday physics around you, to quote the words of others is the braying of  mindless sheep.

Ever wonder about the moon landing film and all the bullshit stories about flags and winmd and all the crap. well heres a first from me not previously noticed or ever published anywhere in the world. but through the eyes of a pure logic thinker, there was one mistake (it really is a bummer to try and show the world you were first just to win even if you have to fake it)

and what's worse no newtonian ever picked up on it, and i have read em all. what about the apple you dickheads???

what does everything appear to do?? float partially when they jump etc, sure you can tie anything to lines except one thing. "THE FUCKING DIRT" everything floated up then down, but when they jumped the dirt that jumped up, fell down at earth speed, the lightest of partclices in the film just went plop straight back down again. the first and the easiest and  with shit rocket technology and we havent been back after all the shuttle trips. download a copy of that before they modify the film.

I never watched it again since i was a kid, until a space suit engineer said what they were wearing was no better than an airconditioned film costume and had no protection from the radiation, and they would all be dead.

Think about that for one moment, NASA and every science expert in the world says that without the ozone to protect us it would be like an apple in front of a blow torch, and they did not land on the dark side of the moon? work that shit out with your fucking maths. beats the shit out of me.

if they were there, then the moon is one weird fucking place man!! like crazy and far out, (well that's what they would have said in 69')

I'll analyze the moon dirt movies and get back to you.
As for the radiation hazards outside the earth's atmosphere, there are two main kinds, photon radiation and high-energy charged particles.  UV and soft x-rays can be shielded by a heavy suit, but a few hard x-rays are going to get through.  Fortunately, there are typically far fewer x- and gamma rays at these energies.  From time-to-time, the sun puts out a burst of intense x-rays, but for short periods.  It would be wise to take shelter, putting as much mass as possible between the sun and oneself during these events.  Astronauts have reported seeing "flashes" and "streaks" inside their eyes that correspond with the arrival of energetic particles from the sun.  The flashes are supposedly caused by charged particles impacting on the retina.  These can screw up computers as well.  This is one of the reasons that the shuttle orbits so low, where it's still inside a good portion of the earth's magnetosphere.

(Of course in '69 there were flashes of light going off inside lots of eyeballs ... "Far Out" indeed )
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

now exactly what respected people is it that you are basing your math and theory on???

I am basing my math and theory on a combination of experience, careful experiments, and reason.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Apples and blow torches, now we're cooking!!

MMM.  Sounds yummy.  Would go well with my liquid nitrogen ice cream!

Cheers and good luck with your build.

-zt

[Rusty_Springs]

Hi Zero
I just wanted to say its good to hear good physics.
Take Care and keep up the good work Zero
Graham