Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



David Bowling's Continuous Charging Device

Started by sterlinga, April 30, 2008, 10:56:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Goat

@Groundloop

Yes the batteries and motor sizes definitely have an effect on the overall circuit, that's why I tried many different variations, they all have different effects, that's why I'm wondering about going towards the original circuit that David and his friend replicated.

Anyways, as I mentioned earlier, I'm here to help you if you need it.

Regards,
Paul

Groundloop

@Goat,

Thank you for your nice offer. I think I must do more research on the circuit first. I have different batteries and motors to test first. I also have an "800" motor that is very close in design to the CIM motor. This weekend I will try out my 42 ampere batteries. Small steps......

Groundloop.

Kator01

Hi groundloop,

you bet I know this but I assume you will kill Bat 1 and 2 in the long run. Even if you will get some free energy for a period would this be cost-effective ? It will also cost two much time to find out. Battery-charge-capacity tests are not an easy thing to do especially because you do not know if it it some free energy or if it is standard recovery-behaviour.

I did a simple test with 3 supercaps ( each 50 Farad, 2.3 Volt ), two fully loaded, one empty.

Motor would run for 15 min and stopped. Voltage-measurement taken over a period of 24 hours across Cap1 +2 ( in series ) and the single cap3 show that charge is lost gradually in both parts. After 3 hours voltage leveled  to 1.37 Volt. Today it is about 1.22 Volt for each part.

Why did i use supecaps ? They are not killed beeing switched in parallell and there are no chemical reactions
involved.

Do I hear the believers of Bedini shout at me : This is exactly the key here to this free-energy-machine, you fool !

Nahh .. nah...

good luck folks

Kator01

Groundloop

Hi Kator01,

First you should study super capacitors a little bit more. :-)

See here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supercapacitor

Super capacitor is a electrochemical device.

That said, it is good to see you are doing research. Dynacaps and Supercaps is
great tools in that regard. You can get fast results. I do not agree with you that you will
kill battery 1 and 2. If it is true (as Dbowling is saying) that both batteries in fact
charge when you run the device then battery 1 and 2 will survive.

Regards,
Groundloop.





Dbowling

Let me throw one more thing in here. I keep emphasizing that battery 3 needs to be a dead battery, but possibly my definition of a dead battery is not the same as everyone elses. I am very new to this stuff, and spend a lot of time playing around. The battery I use will take a charge, but it will NOT hold it. I could charge it up to 14 volts, but if I let it set overnight, it drops down to very little on the meter. Hope that info helps.