David Bowling's Continuous Charging Device

[A_Giggle_For_Chaos]

Can't hold that one against ya. Just wanted to make sure to reach out so at least anybody over here actually working on something knows we are working over there too.

Good luck and thanks for the in depth study.

Matt

[Dbowling]

I am going to throw out what Matt and I believe is happening, based on what we have seen running this setup for over eight years, which includes countless measurements with scopes and meters. There is a REASON battery 2 discharges more than battery 1, and understanding that reason is the KEY to tuning this thing so that it is a self running system. Now, whether it can be a self runner with only the 3 batteries remains to be seen, but we already know that LARGER systems with more batteries CAN be self runners, and it is our belief that the boost module will allow it to happen with a small system. We see evidence of that is in many of the runs we have been doing. None of those has been in excess of six months like runs with larger systems, so we have NO experience to support that yet.


Batteries one and two are in series. So you can add their voltage together and when you put that voltage in PARALLEL with battery 3, the combined voltage of the two in series is higher than the voltage in battery 3, so it charges. Can we all agree on that??


When you add a motor, an inverter (which has a transformer in it) or a transformer into the mix between battery 2 and battery 3, you have placed it IN SERIES WITH battery 3. When the voltage that comes out of the motor, transformer or inverter (it is a PULSED voltage so it CAN be added to the voltage in battery three) You now have a voltage that is higher than the total voltage that is in the two primaries. This higher voltage is now in parallel with the two primary batteries and tries to charge them just like THEY tried to charge battery three, except down the NEGATIVE side. THAT is why battery one stays up longer. It is getting some CHARGE down the negative side. What supports this belief???


The BOOST circuit allows for proper adjustment of this voltage so that the voltage of battery 3 PLUS the boost circuit is higher, and is above the combined voltage of the primaries by the PROPER amount. BOTH batteries one and two charge. Without that proper voltage, only the battery closest to the negative side gets the charge, or at least it gets it FIRST.


I hope that makes sense.


If you are watching what is happening on the other forum, you are seeing that folks who have tuned the system correctly get both primaries to maintain charge or charge, and battery 3 to charge or maintain charge, and are still able to run small loads. I have several folks I am in communication with by email who are having these positive results. I have had the same results. It is not rocket science.

[Dbowling]

Latest and most stable circuit.
Bob French has explained how to tune this so that you can run it for a very long time with no loss in the batteries.


His comments:
The Boost Module pots are not sensitive enough for fine adjustment...that's a problem. I had to run a 2nd Boost Module because the charge battery rose so fast that the main Boost Module (splitting the positives and powering the motor) would drop out because of low potential difference. I finally devised tuning for the 2nd Boost Module like this: I would turn both Boost Modules up to get everything running, then I would turn the 2nd Boost Module down until the main Boost Module dropped out (motor slows), then back up until the main Boot Module cuts back in (motor speeds up). This is the lowest draw on the charge battery. Now you're ready to set the main Boost Module were you want it.[/size]I also found that if the charge battery was still not charging, then turn the main Boost Module up (motor speeds up) and voila! more charging.


OK, good luck. This works. I hope that we can build larger systems that will yield usable power soon. The principle is here...what do we need to do to really capitalize on it. As you can see, everything I used was simple and of reasonable cost, BUT it was NOT just a random smattering of whatever I had laying around from failed experiments of two years ago. Use identical batteries. Don't waste you time and get frustrated.

[ramset]

David and Matt and friends have made huge strides in the last year,
David has an approx. 2000 watt unit running on about 120 watts
Continuously
the feeling is that there will eventually be no limit to the COP

repost below from here

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/19774-basic-free-energy-device-53.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

David

Quote



Info


Just so you guys know, we have had this little generator running for a while now Matt sent me a prototype, and I built it. I have it here, and I have video of it running with inputs and outputs, but unfortunately, I have all that on my computer that is in my garage and NOT connected to the internet so it cannot be hacked. And I am out of town for a week to ten days. I have a video of it assembled and connected to the razor scooter motor here that is on my phone and I can share:

Little Gen 0001 - YouTube   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XjGhXBT-6Zg

and I have another video of it running. That one is on my phone too, and I can post it if you are interested, but it has no input and output numbers.

What you need to understand is the progression that happened here. Matt built a SIMPLE two coil prototype that output over TWICE the power that it took the motor to run it, and we could recover better than 80% of the power the motor was using by running it on the 3 battery system. DEFINITELY COP>2

I replicated that small prototype and saw what Matt saw. Then I built my BIG GENERATOR. It puts out about 1,800 to 2,000 watts depending on speed. So I have to have everything nice and tight and adjusted to get the higher output.

When we saw THAT would work, Matt wanted to put out something that all of YOU could replicate that didn't cost you an arm and a leg to build. My big generator was over $700.00 just for the WIRE. That's why I have NEVER released all the details on it on this forum. It's just too expensive to build unless you BELIEVE what we are telling you and have seen it happen for yourself on your bench measured with YOUR meters.

But here is a video of the big generator running off a larger modified razor scooter motor. This video was taken by the son of my machinist and my machinist is in the video. I am not. I asked him to video it for me, since at the time, the generator was at his shop where he was doing modifications to mount the bigger razor scooter motor. Some of the coils are hooked up to run some lights, so he could show me the output. This machine was DESIGNED to put out between 120-130 volts per coil.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fwUI8FcWVY     https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fwUI8FcWVY

So it isn't that we have built this thing and are still experimenting with what it can do. I have had my big generator running for over a year now. From time to time. It has ALWAYS had problems, and I have had to rebuild it several times to address each problem as it came up. In the video I am showing HERE, it only has ONE rotor between two sets of coils. That was a test setup. The final version has THREE rotors with two sets of coils. Greater output.

BUT, I have solved ALL those problems, and have a design that is not only pretty much bullet proof, but is FAR less expensive than what I started out with and will be cheaper for others to replicate once they see what is possible with the small prototype. Unfortunately, wire, magnets, bearings and shaft are NOT things I can save you money on, so a bigger version is still going to have a hefty price tag. I am putting the new prototype together right now. Unfortunately, the holiday cut into the middle of that, and I won't be home for a week or so. Once the new machine is up and running, I will shoot some video of inputs and outputs so you can see what it can do.

What you people have to remember is that running on the three battery system, the motor that is turning this generator is running almost for FREE between the positives. If we use just a LITTLE of the generated power to keep the primaries topped off, everything else is USABLE ENERGY.

There are 3 things that make this work.

First is the circuit we have been trying to get people to pay attention to for EIGHT YEARS now.
Second is coils on the generator that allow the motor to speed up when the generator is under load.
Third is a generator configuration where the magnetic attraction of the magnets to the coil cores doesn't put extreme stress on the motor.

I am STILL experimenting with a flywheel, but the flywheel action of the three big rotors I have seems to be enough for now.

If you look at the video of the little gen I posted, you will see a stack of wire spools sitting on my bench. That is the wire to wind the coils for the new generator. I am building it from scratch, and I actually need one more spool of wire than what is shown there. I am leaving my existing version as is, so that I can continue to experiment with it while I build the new one. The current prototype needs CONSTANT adjustment, which is why I have scrapped MOST of that design.

Dave
FacebookTwitterGoogle+RedditPinterestLinkedIn__________________
"I aim to misbehave" Malcolm Reynolds
"Try Not! Do or do not. There is no 'Try' ". Yoda 


http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/19774-basic-free-energy-device-53.html

end quote
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all respectful comments welcome
the fellows have this sorted and Matt will be doing an open source  info release shortly

Chet K

[SeaMonkey]

Where on Earth are Miles Higher and the
Tinselized Koala?  They are sorely needed
to continue their critiquing of this topic!

Has anyone either seen or heard from them?