David Bowling's Continuous Charging Device

[FatBird]

Anything new David?

[NerzhDishual]

Hi guys

While we are at Carbon:

1) The (Ren? Louis) Vall?e Synergetic Generator (VSG) is on:
http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/index.htm
Notably on:http://jlnlabs.online.fr/vsg/vsg10.htm
The web server is OK.

2) About

"hydrogen-on-demand system using plasma hydrolysis with carbon rods"

,
You can consult the Naudin's experiments with the 'BingoFuel' on:
http://bingofuel.online.fr/bingofuel/index.htm
Notably on: http://bingofuel.online.fr/bingofuel/html/bfr10.htm

JLN managed to close the loop (for a while).
A vid is on:
http://freenrg.info/Hydrogen/JNaudin_BingoF_Reactor_Closed_Loop.ram




Best

[Feynman]

@NerzhDishual

I think it is interesting that Stefan has been saying for a long time now that carbon (graphite) spark gaps are the best, and only recently Koen dug up the Protelf/VSG stuff out of the archives, which showed that carbon can be used in these cold nuclear reactions.

Are they connected?  I wish I knew!   I think maybe over the next 8 - 12 weeks we might get a better idea on how Protelf, carbon spark gaps, and plasma electrolysis are related or not.

@zerotensor

The thumbnail sketch of the theory is the following...
1) discharge high amounts of current at 35V into a pure carbon rod with thoriated tungsten electrode
2) make sure colinear b-field is applied
3) twenty milliseconds later you get a surge of beta electrons which come flying out of the carbon rod

Why?  Well the theory goes that the electrons you pumped into the carbon actually end up fusing in the carbon atom's nucleus, converting a proton to a neutron for a split second (yielding Boron-12 and a neutrino).  This then sponateously decays, yielding back the original proton and releasing a much higher energy electron than what you put in.

Does it relate to spark gaps?  No idea!

[NerzhDishual]

@Feynman,

Yes, I do agree with you!
I also know that Stefan keeps informing us about Spark gaps, carbon and else...
Actually, few of us seem to have got(ten) his message...

Spark gaps, carbon, resonance, shapes (pyramid for ex), hight gradients, coils, unsymmetrical designs, chance (serendipity) etc, are, IMHO, the keys of 'OU'.
 
I'm not a scientist, just a retired-civil-servant-self-taught-computer-programmer (are the words in the right order?  )

I  have built a lot of 'things' with various, but not obvious (OU-wise), success. I keep on being a 'self taught' newbie and building devices with my mere "prick and my knife" (French expression = 'ma bite et mon couteau', sorry  ).
That is why I only criticize the critics/skeptics.
I'm however just beginning - after years of erring - to understand some essential 'usably' OU concepts.

Best

[FatBird]

Nice diagram.