Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



FREE ENERGY USING MAGNETS

Started by nightlife, May 13, 2008, 11:27:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jeffc

Question:
Does anyone know if a horseshoe or U shaped magnet can lift more weight using both ends together than a similar bar magnet using only one end? 

I don't have any horseshoe or U shaped magnets to test with, only bar and cylinder so I cannot test this concept.

Regards,
jeffc

Koen1

Seems to me that two bar or cylindrical magnets connected via
a piece of ferromagnetic material such as 'soft' iron should result
in a sort of U-shaped magnet with two poles on one side,
and you should be able to test if that 2-pole end can lift more
weight than the 1-pole end of the same two cylinder or bar magnets
connected to form one double length bar or cylinder...


nightlife

I just finished my testing on both, permanent magnets as well as a electromagnet. Both results confirmed my assumption to be true.

Both poles from both the electromagnet and the permanent magnet attracted and repelled equally regardless if one pole was loaded or not.

Are there any other concerns I should check in to before going any further?


Koen1

I don't see any at the moment...

So it's true then?
If you only use one pole of an electromagnet to push or pull the rotor,
you're actually wasting 50% of the energy?

That's quite funky...
And neither Bearden or Bedini noticed this?

It almost sounds impossible eh... But hey, that's what they said about
heavier than air flight too, and two funny bicycle builders made that work...
So that shouldn't stop you from trying your 2-pole setup! ;D

nightlife

Koen1,
QuoteSo it's true then?

Based on my testing it's true. When I used a permanent magnet, I placed a iron object to the point of attractions start and then I placed a identical iron object on the opposite side at the point of its attractions start and then I confirmed that the other was still at the attraction start and then I measured the distance between the two and I found them to be exact. I then did the test using the repelling effect and ended up with the same results.
I then Tested a electromagnet the same way and I ended up with the same results.

QuoteAnd neither Bearden or Bedini noticed this?

I can't say they did or didn't but I have yet to see a motor built and or designed using this design.

QuoteIt almost sounds impossible

That is true and that is why I tested what was questioned just to make sure. There may be a design out there like this and it is just being hid from us. Heck, you never know these days and I can't believe that my self being a POS 9th grade drop out could figure this out and no else has. Some one else must have figured this out other then me.