Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



FREE ENERGY USING MAGNETS

Started by nightlife, May 13, 2008, 11:27:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

nightlife

Let me explain the advantages of my magnet arangement.

1. It doubles the power out put.

2. It gives you the option of having a longer power throw.

3. It can be kept to only move in one direction.

The ideal set up be to have one coil for every two sets of magnets. Damn, I just had another brain storm. You will love this next one. LOL

nightlife

 In this design, the coil is placed between to wheels that are attached to the same axel. Each wheel has magnets around them as pictured. This could be easily multiplied as shown in the second picture. Multiple coils can and should be used between each of two wheels. The end outside surfaces of the wheels can be utilized by installing magnets for charging coils. This design may be the best yet and I am thinking of other ways to utilize it?s design. I should get a job doing this type of work. LOL

Dact

 Quote from Nightlife: "I shouldn't post this but what the heck."

My sentiments exactly, at this point. I believe too many people have been concentrating too much on designing a CAPTURE device for the forces of magnetism, instead of concentrating on the forces themselves. In almost every case, the opposite polarity somehow cancels out the force of the other. Also, in almost every case, a rotor and stationary stators are used. Why?

In the case of other "forces" we have successfully captured, i.e., water power, wind power, and steam power, we have utilized a blade, or turbine system, to capture the energy. Why not magnetism? Since joining this forum a year ago, I have recalled a demonstration that my seventh grade science teacher showed us. She had constructed a pinwheel shaped "fan" of flat magnets, and introduced a fairly large rod magnet in front of the pinwheel, The magnet pinwheel spun like crazy. However, before she could explain the design and science behind it, a teacher ran in from next door, and screamed at my teacher to turn on our small b & w TV to CBS, and Walter Cronkite. The time was a little after !:00 PM, on November 22nd, 1963. I never saw that device again, but I DID see it, for a short time.

IMHO, I don't see why this would not work. Only one polarity would be "active", from both the pinwheel and the cylindrical manger, and if both were the same, the repulsion would seem to be uniform across the surfaces of the "fan magnets", and if properly angled, would cause the rotor to turn.

I have tried to model this in WM2D, but the closest I could get was to produce the fans from curved polygons angles to produce an offset center of mass, and to introduce an electrostatic force from above. I have attached the model for anyone to modify and experiment with. SOMETHING is definitely causing this model to spin at increasing velocities!

Nightlife, the reason I barged in on your discussion was because you wanted to utilize both polarities instead of just one. Well, if a pinwheel motor was possible, it would use only one polarity as viewed head on, however, there is still the "other side". And besides, you encouraged me to take the chance and post. I'm not getting any younger or healthier! Thank you!

Dact

P.S. Nightlife, if you feel that my post should be separate, don't hesitate to say so.
"Terror hearts out, always;
Terror fabric, NEVER!"

gotoluc

@Nightlife,

Below is the image of what I have been thinkind building of for a while. It uses both sides of the Magnets and both sides of the Coils. I would have 8 Coils around the Stator and 7 Magnets around the Rotor, like a Bill Muller Generator, that way it gets rid of sticky spots.

Luc

gyulasun

Quote from: gotoluc on May 15, 2008, 02:17:01 AM
@Nightlife,

Below is the image of what I have been thinkind building of for a while. It uses both sides of the Magnets and both sides of the Coils. I would have 8 Coils around the Stator and 7 Magnets around the Rotor, like a Bill Muller Generator, that way it gets rid of sticky spots.

Luc

Hi Luc,

I assume you will drive the rotor with something (preferably with a low power motor) and utilize the induced power in the stators' coils, right? 
Would like to ask how you think the effect of Lenz law will manifest in the input power consumption of the driving motor? 
I assume the load current in the output coils will always create repel poles at the endings of the stators with respect to the just approaching and then leaving rotor magnet poles. It is ok that you can cleverly manipulate the number of coils with the number of rotor magnets to minimize cogging but once the load appears so does the repel poles at the prongs so cogging may reappear, with increasing input power demand due to Lenz law, this is how I think now.

Have you considered these things already?

Thanks,  Gyula