Bessler Wheel Theory by Alex

[rlortie]

Good morning Stefan

Yes I have a considerable financial investment in my shop and tools. It has been envied by a number of professional Machinists. Engine lathe, Bench mill, 20" swing floor mount drill press, floor mount spindle shaper, stick and Mig welders, accessory's and hand tools to numerous to list .  The carpenter shop contains two built in 10" radial arm saws capable of handling material up to 25 feet in length. 10" professional grade table saw, 6" jointer, 24" power feed drum sander, 6 X 48" disk and belt sander, 9"  swing wood lathe with 52" bed and all the hand and power tools one could ever want. 

I built this inventory over a period of years while gainfully employed with the idea of having it all paid for by retirement age. Side jobs and doing custom work has helped absorb some of the the initial investment. I fabricate and machine  everything from wooden antique body parts to the replacement of  airplane parts for restoration.

My picture gallery is only the tip of the iceberg, The majority of my albums are filled with confidential designs that I cannot post. When I build a research proto (at no charge to submitter) and it fails, it is at the discretion of the submitter as to releasing it for public view.  Sorry to say that few are willing to do this.

Now I would like to emphasize on your statement; "You can't Patent it"   You  can and  I believe that all members of this and any O-U involved forum should be aware of the fact.

I disagree with your statement that a gravity wheel cannot be patented,  gravity wheel patents  exist and they are still excepted. It is all in the strategy used in making the application and is the key to your submittal  being accepted.  You start by not calling it a "Perpetual Motion Machine" or a "Gravity Engine". Rather you refer to it as a Gravity assisted Amplifier  or some such related flash of brilliance rather than a baffle of bull -----

After mailing in your application y certified mail and you have the dated postmasters receipt in hand it is dated by post mark.  You can now legally state that you have a "Patent Pending"  you are now covered and protected,  now it is time to go public. You will then receive notification that your patent application has been received. They are slow, so figure on taking the opportunity to publicize your product to the fullest extent. You can even put it into production stamped "Patent Pending". In the meantime the patent examiner is pondering your machine and  wondering exactly what category it fits into. If he refuses  he must explain on what  grounds he or she basis the  decision on. Also it will be scrutinized to  deem if it falls under the National Securities Act.  A little late to worry there, you have already told the world of its existence. 

Be prepared to take a trip!  Chances are the patent officer reviewing your machine will not understand it, and he will  refuse your application. You immediately file an appeal with the Patent Office Board of Appeals.  You must travel to their  office with a small working desk top model of your machine, set it on the desk directly in front of them.  They cannot deny that it is not running. You "win" hands down. Now the bad part. The above scenario has been known to take up to 3 years to resolve.  The good part is,you have already been in production for the better part of that 3 years,  there is no way for the oil lobbies  to influence the patent office into securing your patent by referring to the National Security Act.

My prime reference in backing this scenario and a valid legal precedent is the story of Howard Johnson and his  marvelous magnetic motor. His motor never became a reality but every person involved in O-U research should  recognize and appreciate the fact that he convinced the appeals board that  magnets can and do meet the requirements deemed "work".. A precedent that opens the door allowing access to patenting any device based on the use  of what  is considered "conservative force".

I also have a marketing and management strategy  outlined but will save it for another post!

Ralph                     

[bluesgtr44]

First off, Ralph has one heck of a workshop. He can put up pictures of it....it still wouldn't do it justice.

Alex, I have messed with MT's 24 and 25 before....I have also added the beams that go across and it doesn't give any excess energy. I thought in your original post that the curved levers were curved so that it would allow for these to lean on the axle, I must have been mistaken as that is not how you applied that. As it is, all of the weight of the beam is applied downward at about the 7 o'clock position that the levered rod arrangement cannot overcome. I don't think even with it leaning on the axle would help it to rotate perpetually. Fletch pretty much covered this....trading height for width and it balances out. Tried to post a pic of it from WM2D, but it's just over 50kb...


Steve

[Alexioco]

First off, Ralph has one heck of a workshop. He can put up pictures of it....it still wouldn't do it justice.

Alex, I have messed with MT's 24 and 25 before....I have also added the beams that go across and it doesn't give any excess energy. I thought in your original post that the curved levers were curved so that it would allow for these to lean on the axle, I must have been mistaken as that is not how you applied that. As it is, all of the weight of the beam is applied downward at about the 7 o'clock position that the levered rod arrangement cannot overcome. I don't think even with it leaning on the axle would help it to rotate perpetually. Fletch pretty much covered this....trading height for width and it balances out. Tried to post a pic of it from WM2D, but it's just over 50kb...


Steve

Trading height for width is bad, yes I understand which puts me off my wheel a little, but guess what, this new wheel which I will soon show, lifts the weight without trading height for width, all of the weights are equally placed around the wheel except that one side is over balanced, its as simpel as that, but I dont want to say to much yet, it does come from my previous wheel though...

[broli]

I have been trying to get MT 13 in wm2d but daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaamn....wm2d is a very very very annoying piece of software for doing something which ought to be fast and simple. Anyways I have the wm2d file with me so the people that want to have a got at it can. The other that can't. Well it's basiclly very choppy,jumpy, error prone etc.

The actual concept has been drawn with autocad. It's kind of funny that wm2d fails at both the drawing part and physics part. It basiclly is a piece of junk. Anyways the file and a screen shot follow.




http://broli.dommel.be/MT13.wm2d

[Alexioco]

Hey its good that people are making these wheels, even though wm2d may not be 100% right, it at least it says something about these wheels, oh and I'm going to buy some weights on Saturday, I need them to be just a nice size and heavy enough so I will see what I can find...