Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Just in case...

Started by tsl, May 19, 2008, 10:36:04 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

BEP

For quite a while I've been convinced rotation is needed. Most have published it is a cause instead of a result. I don't think it is a cause, especially not in a pumping quadrature fashion.
Two axis.... Yes, few discussions on that but things are 3D, afterall. On the vector summation this is the only way I see any amplification. That alone takes you into old physics arguments relating to approaching c and the effects. Don't need to go there.

A radial mag field? No problem. We all do it every day. (current flowing through a wire) But I don't think that is the only radial mag field. I'm trying to allow time for bench proof (not much luck nowdays) to find that two reacting radial mag fields will create a third field. If I'm right that third field will not be magnetic but would create a magnetic field that would aid the other two. I suspect that third field will be the equivalent of current flowing through a wire but in an axial direction - and no wire. That would create a radial mag field that would aid and perhaps replace the first radial field.
Kind of like a furnace that uses fire as fuel.

It isn't difficult to build something that will go boom. I've had my share of that. I've also been known to spew theories. Trying to clean up my act a bit here. I'm still trying to weed out the fact from the last theories I vomited. The above is one from several months ago that remains on the list.

If nothing else I've learned a great deal and had fun doing it.

tsl

Quote from: BEP on June 20, 2008, 01:11:05 AM
...A radial mag field? No problem. We all do it every day. (current flowing through a wire)... 
It will be a circular one not radial.

tsl

Quote from: Chef on June 20, 2008, 05:58:56 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-w5WK5-uIU


@Chef
Nice.But you get this because of the interaction of 2 fields not from a pulsed coil alone.




BEP

Quote from: tsl on June 20, 2008, 02:07:35 AM
It will be a circular one not radial.

Yes, of course. Probably a matter of perspective. The density varies radially but the magnetic polarity is circular. The hard thing for me is to always remember everything is at right angles.

I'm thinking the right angles are key. At some point of this angle generation the direction is that needed for current generation in the conductor. Then that would be feedback, resonance and amplification together.
The problem I'm having in this thought experiment is at this point current flow is reversed. The reason for mirror images of coils? The control of one fed by the collector of the other?
Not sure and need to get to work again  >:(

Grumpy

The field that is perpendicular to the wire is the "tempic" field (radial).

Like this:
It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards