Bedini motor, debunked by MythBusters.

[Bulbz]

The MythBusters did it again...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3I9RUCrjoQ


In my honest oppinion.... The Mythbusters duo are a couple of bellends. They even busted the "Spud up the exhaust trick", they did that with a big engine. I actually know that it does work on a 1.4 Renault engine. Coz I spudded a teacher's exhaust pipe when I was at school, I hid and watched as he tried to crank the engine, and it did not start  . And yet, those two prats said that it was a myth.

They sure do look like oil bandits to me  .

[not_a_mib]

They did a similar thing to the Hamel device.

The one thing that show does well is blowing stuff up.  (Such as a trombone filled with gunpowder, or a cement mixer packed with several hundred pounds of high explosive.)

[Bulbz]

I don't actually hate them coz they can be comical buggers sometimes. But a lot of the time, they do talk a load of tripe.

[Low-Q]

Maybe Bendini himself shoud post a proof - without confusing us with millions of wires, volt-meters, amp-meters around and in front of the motor? Maybe Mythbusters should have the original Bendinimotor to do tests on?
Guess what: It would probably be busted anyway - that's my guess. It IS a fantacy most (I think all) of these motors - no doubt.

Vidar

[Bulbz]

Maybe Bendini himself shoud post a proof - without confusing us with millions of wires, volt-meters, amp-meters around and in front of the motor? Maybe Mythbusters should have the original Bendinimotor to do tests on?
Guess what: It would probably be busted anyway - that's my guess. It IS a fantacy most (I think all) of these motors - no doubt.

Vidar

I agree with you that Bedini should simplify how the device is presented, but MythBusters should also do the experiment properely and profssionally without laughing in the inventor' face.