Lutec PR Executive Statement

[ourbobby]

Hi guys,
            its not my intention to whip up a storm. The Lutec reference was purely to demonstrate caution at dealing with companies that start correspondence with "Dear Donkey", and then procede with further insults.

As for the Penderev Motor, I agree, that Anderson is asking us to take him on faith.

With regards to the loss of magnetic density, I am of the impression that it is common practice in some instances to "knock them down" from a higher strength to a lower strength using other magnets:-

http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae472.cfm

This notion of demagnetisation through repulsion is an area that has recently become a focus of my attention. Albeit, in my pursuit of a source of, and I use the term loosely, "free energy". I have the distinct feeling that this might be one of the reasons why the "Magnetic Wankel" engine did not procede forward. IMHO, it had nothing to do with Tom Bearden's claim of tactics by the "Yakusa", it was a straight forward problem with motor maintenance. To find out if this is correct, a Magnetic Wankel engine of sufficient size would have to be built and tested.

Regards to you all.

[jibbguy]

Reading that sceptic's article in the PDF, i don't blame Christie for calling the guy a donkey

Here is the main problem with over-unity skeptics: They do not have any, not a shread, of proof one way or the other, yet they will run on the "certainty" that it is phoney. That is their "job" so to speak, and they go out of their way to use all the derogitory and emotionally-loaded words like "perpetual motion".... Taking about Dennis Lee or others in the same sentance, as if it is proven that Christie is one of them... Lol, even talking about poor widows and ophans losing their savings to charlitans. All without a lick of proof.  This shows exactly where their head is at. They will be bound and determined, one way or the other, to discredit the invention.... If not by science then by pysc-ops.

In fact, it is their only weapon when they don't have any evidence to disprove it scientifically... Talk about it with derision, laugh at the kooks, and hope people don't notice that they have absolutely nothing to base their opinion on.

Let them put up money for an independant University laboratory to do the study instead: And shut-up with the derogitory comments until the results are in  

But there are no University studies being done on these devices (openly anyway, there's evidence that the military is doing them) .......

International investors and venture capitalists, people not known to throw away their money... will back it the devices with millions. But it is too "kooky" for the Universities to even consider studying them?

It seems the only ones in the mainstream wanting to invest time into this are the paid skeptics.... So they can try to debunk it. Who's paying them, i wonder?

[MADMARV74]

 I really enjoyed the youtube video of this unique machine. If there are any types of schematics anywhere of the actual machine or availability of purchasing the machine like Christie said in the video for $5,000 dollars I'd BUILD IT MYSELF!

P.S. I'm building my hho driver board and on the high frequency side there was suppose to a 200 nF 16v capacitor in the cricuit. I placed a big order and receive my components from MOUSER in Dallas,Tx. But I'm missing the 200nF cap. Does anyone think I can place 2 100 nF capacitors in series and get same results as 200nF?
Yes I know it's a far cry from saving the world... but just need a little push towards the correct direction on this one.
i believe the magnet theory of propulsion and involsion reaction and inducing voltage building up in a capacitor bank would unltimately give off extra energy and I'd like to try it....... After I'm get the knack of my HHO cells.
see my vids on youtube under username mlexus74

[utilitarian]

Reading that sceptic's article in the PDF, i don't blame Christie for calling the guy a donkey

Here is the main problem with over-unity skeptics: They do not have any, not a shread, of proof one way or the other, yet they will run on the "certainty" that it is phoney. That is their "job" so to speak, and they go out of their way to use all the derogitory and emotionally-loaded words like "perpetual motion".... Taking about Dennis Lee or others in the same sentance, as if it is proven that Christie is one of them... Lol, even talking about poor widows and ophans losing their savings to charlitans. All without a lick of proof.  This shows exactly where their head is at. They will be bound and determined, one way or the other, to discredit the invention.... If not by science then by pysc-ops.

In fact, it is their only weapon when they don't have any evidence to disprove it scientifically... Talk about it with derision, laugh at the kooks, and hope people don't notice that they have absolutely nothing to base their opinion on.

Let them put up money for an independant University laboratory to do the study instead: And shut-up with the derogitory comments until the results are in  

But there are no University studies being done on these devices (openly anyway, there's evidence that the military is doing them) .......

International investors and venture capitalists, people not known to throw away their money... will back it the devices with millions. But it is too "kooky" for the Universities to even consider studying them?

It seems the only ones in the mainstream wanting to invest time into this are the paid skeptics.... So they can try to debunk it. Who's paying them, i wonder?

Don't rag on the skeptics too hard - so far they are correct about overunity.  Not a single device has been shown to be such.  And it is not quite right to say that there is not a shred of evidence.  The evidence is the known body of scientific knowledge which can be applied to an  unknown device.  The skeptic may not know exactly how the said black-box device operates, but based on current scientific knowledge, the skeptic can say that the black box cannot continue to spit out more energy than came in.

For example, if someone claimed to have a free-standing machine that could continually eject two quarters for every quarter inserted, a person would not be out of line to be skeptical of the device.  There would be nothing wrong at all in pressing the proponent of the device for more detail or for a controlled demonstration, especially if the said proponent (like Lutec, here) continued to carry a website offering investment opportunity in said magic quarter multiplier.

[dingbat]

Does anyone think I can place 2 100 nF capacitors in series and get same results as 200nF?

They would go in parallel, not series.  (Resistors add in series, capacitors add in parallel.)