Lutec small demo machine proof of overunity video

[Low-Q]

A sad fact about these kind of machines is that force equals counterforce - for the time being. I am very suspicious to all devices which includes wires, batteries, transformers. Show us/me a pure working magnet motor, without any wires - and I will try to believe it is the real thing.

Br.

Vidar

[hartiberlin]

According to the Lutec site their device will work from mains power.

So I don't think a battery or the ions in it are part of the essential workings of their device.

Which brings us back to the question, if it produces more output than it needs as input why can't the output be fed back into it to keep it running?

The simplest answer would be that the device just doesn't work.

Yes, it can also work from the main power grid,
if you use a power supply, which is
decoupled enough, so the back current spikes from the
mechanical commutator switching is rerouted into
the load circuit and thus produce more electrical power
out than electrical input power.
Of course this will only work,
if you have the right coils and magnet setups inside
the Lutec motor-generator.

Have a look at this:

http://www.lutec.com.au/lea_test.htm

http://www.lutec.com.au/video/lutec_LEA.wmv
http://www.lutec.com.au/video/lutec06.mpg

Regards, Stefan.

[edo]

Following-on from an earlier comment ...

        hartiberlin wrote:
        [?]
        The battery is constantly recharged due to these sparkings at the commutator.

        This produces additional energy due to electron clustering at the commutator contacts and thus the batteries don?t discharge.  To run these without batteries is not so easy, cause the recharge effect also occurs due to slow movement of the ions inside the batteries....
        [?]
        As the commutator contacts are used up after a while ( they just burn up) this needs attention for a real sales unit and they still work on this aspect.

        Regards, Stefan.

I agree with arcing (spark-gaps) being a real candidate for the apparent "extra" energy.  This thesis is also supported by experiments shown at
        http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/SparkGapExp/SparkGapExp.htm
and at
        http://www.intalek.com/Index/Projects/MultiSparkGap/MultiSparkGapExp.htm

And, work done by Jean-Louis Naudin (and as related-to on his website) show even more examples of arcs producing additional energy, as well as transmutation of metals/materials.  In my limited knowledge, I know of
only one way to transmutate metals/materials and that is by some form of nuclear-reaction.  Beside the extra energy, the source material will be consumed: In this case, there is no "magic" but rather a something-for-something exchange.

The electron clustering is, as I understand things, another story :-)

Well, that's my two-bits worth ...
edo

[pese]

@ stefan
der test.htm
kann dieser Messung nach falsche Werte erbringen !!

Nur wenn nach dem Akku (Battery) das Wattmeter mit einem
Kondensator zur L.e.A. abgeblockt ist . Ist der angezeugte Wert
m?g?icherweise richtig.
Ein Wechselmagentfeld des Motorgenerators , kann so wie aufgezeigt , den Weg zur?ck zur Batterie ?ber Wattmeter "1"
finden und so kleinere (?) anzeigen , in jedemfall falsche Angabe.
Die DC Versorgung muss am EINGANG zur L.E.A. abgeblockt sein.


This way to metering is wrong. the DC Supply must be blocked on Input to LEA with Condensors ,against flyback power from
motorgenerator (inform AC/RF) back over wattmeter to the nattery-

Pese

[Charlie_V]

This scared me when I saw it because it looked like a generator I am currently building.  I was thinking, crap someone has already done it!  But fortunately, after reading "how it works" on their website, this motor is a complete sham and nothing like what I am trying to do.  Hurray!