LUTEC-JOHN CHRISTIE-AUSTRALIA

[johnagain]

Dose anyone know the current position on lutec are the still in existance and contactable

[Ergo]

Try yourself, but you better have some cash to offer or you won't see any replies.....

[Flyboy]

If you believe they really have found overunity 9 years ago and is still not showing anything except
seeking end users (which is no problem in finding) you are truly a hopefull and very gullible person.

Thanks Ergo for your reply, 9 years is not that long for r&d when limited to a crew of 2 and only have hobbie hours to put into it, however I have seen enough other products in my time that had some cool led lights on a box cover that I can understand your position.  What I was really after was if anyone know of anyone who has currently worked along similar lines as these guys.  I suspect there are awesome answers very close to the area they are working in regardless of whether or not Lutec has struck gold or not.

[Ergo]

Here's a test report on the Lutec contrapment.

Quote: http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Lutec1000/
Rosenthal and Cole
Report by Sterling D. Allan
March 8, 2003

Engineers, Walt Rosenthal and Parke Cole were invited to measure the Lutec1000 in January 2001.
Their measurements showed results showed 28% efficiency.
The exchange was amendable, despite the negative test results.
Rosenthal stated, "I walked them through the calculations carefully so they would understand,
but they didn't want to believe the results."  Test entailed a dynamometer measuring output the motor,
powering with power supply from wall producing DC volts, optical shaft encoder on end of shaft to measure rpm.
Results showed 50 Watts power going in and 14 Watts equivalent of mechanical power coming out.

After receiving the above synopsis, Walt Rosenthal added the following:

Report by Walt Rosenthal
(recorded March 8, 2003)

The inventors would start with fully charged batteries for the demonstration.
They assumed that the battery terminal voltage would decrease linearly as the battery was used.
So, after using the battery for, say, 30 minutes, they would again measure the battery terminal voltage,
and subtract this value from the start voltage, then multiply that difference voltage times the known amp-hour
capacity of the battery bank, to come up with their assumption of the total energy consumed from the battery bank.
Unfortunately, battery terminal voltage is almost flat for perhaps 90 percent of the battery capacity, before it
drops off rather steeply for the last 10 percent of it's capacity.
Parke Cole and I tried to explain this to the inventors. I am not sure we succeeded.
We were about the 15th group of people to show up on their door step after they went public.
We were the first people to bring our own test equipment.
The inventors said that the first people to show up were the Russian Mafia.
Our bottom line was 50 watts of DC power input, which resulted in 14 watts of rotary mechanical power output.
I hope the inventors have improved their device from where we tested it so that it now matches their statements of it's performance.
End Quote:

[Ergo]

Please see the attached PDF on a serious and revealing Lutec Investigation.
Their motor is only 33% efficient........