Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



URGENT! WATER AS FUEL DISCOVERY FOR EVERYONE TO SHARE

Started by gotoluc, June 26, 2008, 06:01:38 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.

happyvalley808

@All,

Here is a video showing how to remove the resistor from a spark plug....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-J2AHNZUZD0

Best regards,

HV

insane4evr

Resistorless spark plug:

I wanted plugs for a 1993 toyota pickup and a 1970 Camaro.
Here is what I did: I went to site www.sparkplugs.com
Plugged in my car info to get: thread, reach, and hex size. Of course they will list resistor type.

Then I played with searching for makes older than 1960 with the same thread, reach, and hex size (maybe not too important) and here is what I found for my needs:

For my 1993 toyota pickup: Non-US automobile, Hillman Hunter: NGK Traditional sparkplug BP6ES (non-resistor).

For my 1970 Camaro: 1957 Corvette: NGK Traditional sparkplug B6S (non-resistor).

You can either order from them and might pay a hefty shipping cost or knowing the part number(s) that will work, see if your local store carries them.

Just my 2 cents.


zzzz

Dear Luc,
   Bug is not so strong ( with standard engine ) so they gave me very much gear ratio,
at 100 kmhr he use 4800rpm@3rd and 120kmhr 4000rpm@4th
I ever hit 5200 some time but for save side i think 6000 is number,

If you mean torch and pull cermic out I understnd and done that
but I can't assembling it back for work...... it slip out ... 555   :P


for sure I read this great post since first page,
repilcate some Ossise circuit,
may be it too long for may memory, I need to re read all again, thanks.

still need the recommend on my  question.

regard,
zzzz


gmeast

Quote from: zzzz on October 08, 2008, 11:06:10 PM
Great job Greg ;D
Thanks very much..., this the thing I waiting for.  ;D  ;D  ;D

please help to solve my question.

from your explanation, If i want to rev at 6000 rpm, 4 cyl, time consume in each spark is 5ms. or 0.005 s
so you reccomend to use 5 time less that mean 1 ms for charging, right?  ???

if correct, what differences between High C Low R that give the same RC vaule as Low C high R. and for this 22uf with 45Ohm is ok. have effect with spark plug eating?

and about isolate transformer, it 1:1 correct, but it can't find it nearest is 1:2 ( 110 to 220V ) can i use 220 invertor and stepdown to 110 and use with this circuit. ???

as your reccomend to keep lowest resistacnes in all system, but i can't fine non resistances spark plug here..  :P   How can i make VexUs work?

Hi zzzz,

wow ... many questions ... I am just using basic knowledge here.  I am no expert.

22uf @ 450 ohms  = 0.0099 sec. too long,: 22uf @ 45 ohms = .00099 sec.= about 0.001 or 1ms.

also remember your power requirement: you will charge about 150 VDC so 150V / 45oh = 3.3A
but if 1 RC then ave. = 3.3 / 2 = 1.7A X 150 = 250 Watts (power resistor rating).  I guess this is why people are using light bulbs.

in RC time circuits 1 time constant is about 68% of full charge and that is what is used in the RC calculation.  5 time constants is considered full time until you reach full charge because the charge is not linear with time.  So you take what you need, such as 0.005 sec., and divide by 5 ONLY for computing the values for R or C ... whichever you are starting with.  So we are actually computing the values of the components for 5ms ... crazy!

on isolation transformers:  I have not completely explored the VexUs circuit.  It is possible that using higher voltage may work better than low voltage.  I don't know yet.  It is a new circuit.  I have been using McMaster-Carr transformers and I can give you a part number.

70245K71    
Control Transformer with Plug & Connector 150 VA, 115V Input, 115V Output

if you use a transformer that is TRULY an isolation transformer then you may use a step down isolation transformer.  As I said ... this is new to me too.

Any other help on non-resistor plugs for zzzz would be appreciated.

Peace,

Greg

gmeast

Quote from: happyvalley808 on October 08, 2008, 11:22:04 PM
Hi greg,

I think you have answered all of Bill Cozzalino's questions from his latest video of the "Nexus circuit"  with your "VexUs"
circuit......And you managed to keep it simple, i love it !!!

What do you think about replacing the FWB with Xboxhackers voltage doubler...being that we can now tune the spark to our liking....????

Aloha,

HV

Hi HV,

To tell you the truth I don't know how it will react to higher voltages.  It is 'tunable' for sure, but I would hesitate going too HV because the power rating for the current limiter R1 might go too high and it may end up needing to be an active circuit device rather than a cheap passive one as it is now.  Much basic experimenting should be done to find out what the practical limits are.  I plan to keep probing the prototype circuit from the video for transients that could be damaging to an ECM or computer stuff.  If it turns up clean, I'll put it in my '96 F150 Truck.  It's all computer, OBDII, blah, blah, blah electronic, etc.

So in a nut shell, 'uh ... I don't know'.  Still working on everything but the basic circuit I posted is solid I think.

One thing I have entertained is switching in & out various combinations of R1's and C1's to change the energy character of the circuit.  This is practical to do I think.

Peace,

Greg