Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Hubbard coil

Started by EMdevices, July 01, 2008, 05:03:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

innovation_station

Quote from: pauldude000 on July 15, 2008, 12:23:23 AM

Otherwise every single resonant frequency circuit built would be producing the desired effects...... Radio's, TV's, Computers, etc.... Yet, they amazingly DON'T.
END OF ADDITION:

It is amazing how everyone states the TPU puts out DC.

In the video copy I bought from JDO300 (the high-quality version), it is amazing how he makes the statement DC at 5Khz, then when prompted quickly states "No, it is A.C... For all intents and purposes it is D.C."

Paul Andrulis

you put in plused dc... it returns a few diffrent things dc ac orbit!! re etc

but the reason i quoted you is because  tv, radios, computers are GROUNDED OUT!! to discard insted of capture and reuse

ist
To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!

z.monkey

Howdy Y'all,

So Grumpy, you have a working Hubbard Coil, that you built with your own hands?  I have never seen a Hubbard coil with an automotive distributor on it.  That idea is absurd.  Your applying 10s of kilovolts to the primaries and what comes out 100s of kilovolts?  I have so many devices that need 100,000 volts input power.  This device is a current generator, I didn't say that it requires high current to start it.  This is supposed to be a self sustaining generator that we can hook up to our appliances to and run them directly.  Hubbard never mentioned needing a power converter to adjust the output power to the correct voltage and phase.  I know I had a major epiphany concerning this device, and I do understand it.  If you cannot see what I see, you don't have to ridicule me.  Inferring that I look at the world with some electric arc colored glasses is also wrong.  I am a seasoned professional in electronic and electrical physics.  I earn my living knowing what I am talking about, not dreaming up some fantasy circuit in a science fiction novel.  The only thing that melted here is my respect for you...

Blessed Be Brothers...
Goodwill to All, for All is One!

Grumpy

Quote from: pauldude000 on July 15, 2008, 12:23:23 AM
That is really interesting, as I have read tons of Tesla's works, both early and late, and have never come across this assertion. It would be great if you could provide a source for this Grumpy sir.


This is from this book:
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/nt_on_ac.htm

You can also see this proven in Richard Hull's work with Tesla Magnifiers. A two-coil resonant coil system can never achieve what a magnifier can.

Quote from: pauldude000 on July 15, 2008, 12:23:23 AM

Concerning the impact resonance, yes self-limiting resonance is achieved. However, this resonance is self destructive, and doesn't provide squat.

ADDED CONCERNING ABOVE STATEMENT:
Otherwise every single resonant frequency circuit built would be producing the desired effects...... Radio's, TV's, Computers, etc.... Yet, they amazingly DON'T.
END OF ADDITION:

It is amazing how everyone states the TPU puts out DC.

In the video copy I bought from JDO300 (the high-quality version), it is amazing how he makes the statement DC at 5Khz, then when prompted quickly states "No, it is A.C... For all intents and purposes it is D.C."

Paul Andrulis

Impact oscillations are self-limiting in your world perhaps. 

In SM's letters to Lindsay, which are later than the videos, he states that the output of a TPU is DC with "hash".

The output could be DC or AC depending on the configuration.  For DC you push in one direction, for AC you push back and forth - so-to-speak.

Radios, TVs, other electronic devices do produce "a field" other than electric and magnetic, but they are not produced in such a way that will produce the desired results.

A couple more years of working on this and you may be more receptive.
It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards

innovation_station

i agree with grumpy

the out put is what ever you designed it for.....

listen switch amparage through your hubbard coil  ;D

then you see the light  8)  bring your shades  ;D

even 1 amp :D

so now you see da light stand up for your right .....  marley

ist

im just getting sick ....   too much bs round here it is far easyer then you all think...

wake up already
To understand the action of the local condenser E in fig.2 let a single discharge be first considered. the discharge has 2 paths offered~~ one to the condenser E the other through the part L of the working circuit C. The part L  however  by virtue of its self induction  offers a strong opposition to such a sudden discharge  wile the condenser on the other hand offers no such opposition ......TESLA..

THE !STORE IS UP AND RUNNING ...  WE ARE TAKEING ORDERS ..  NOW ..   ISTEAM.CA   AND WE CAN AND WILL BUILD CUSTOM COILS ...  OF   LARGER  OUTPUT ...

CAN YOU SAY GOOD BYE TO YESTERDAY?!?!?!?!

Grumpy

Quote from: z.monkey on July 15, 2008, 05:42:27 AM
So Grumpy, you have a working Hubbard Coil, that you built with your own hands?
Don't need one, and I'm not ready to lose time on AG stuff to build one at the moment.  Although, a very small one, about the size of a drink coaster, pulsed via a buzzing relay would not take long to do.  I just noticed that the EM and ring resonator approach was wrong.  Ring resonators usually take two inputs phased 90 degrees apart.  Peter Ceperley developed one that only needs one input by using a perterbation - quite interesting.  Coil sections in a continuous ring as well as capacitors are required - see third image below.


Quote from: z.monkey on July 15, 2008, 05:42:27 AM
I have never seen a Hubbard coil with an automotive distributor on it.  That idea is absurd.  Your applying 10s of kilovolts to the primaries and what comes out 100s of kilovolts?  I have so many devices that need 100,000 volts input power. 

You have never seen a working Hubbard device anymore than anyone else alive has - so you can only guess and make assumptions like everyone else.  See images below for the distributor and try to explain it away.  Hubbard used 11,250 volt power supply - a 10kv oil burner ignition transformer would suffice.  Hell, a CW voltage multiplier would probably work, as would a flyback rectified.  Plenty of schemtics online for these.

Quote from: z.monkey on July 15, 2008, 05:42:27 AM
This device is a current generator, I didn't say that it requires high current to start it.  This is supposed to be a self sustaining generator that we can hook up to our appliances to and run them directly.  Hubbard never mentioned needing a power converter to adjust the output power to the correct voltage and phase.  I know I had a major epiphany concerning this device, and I do understand it.  If you cannot see what I see, you don't have to ridicule me.  Inferring that I look at the world with some electric arc colored glasses is also wrong.  I am a seasoned professional in electronic and electrical physics.  I earn my living knowing what I am talking about, not dreaming up some fantasy circuit in a science fiction novel.  The only thing that melted here is my respect for you...

Blessed Be Brothers...

The Hubbard device is a "conversion device".   Who said the motor used was an AC motor?  It could have been DC.  The specs for the motor are never given other than the HP.  If you follow conventional thinking and theories, you will wind up at the same dead end as everyone else.  Credentials don't matter.  Educated people are the hardest to change.  It's like the incomplete knowledge that they were taught works against them.

I apologize for any ridicule.  Respect for me is not required.  I place little value on things like that and could care less what people think.

Here is an article by Gaston Burridge regarding the Hubbard device:
http://www.rafoeg.de/20,Dokumentenarchiv/10,Personenbezogenes_Archiv/,Hubbard_Alfred/The%20Hubbard%20Energy%20Transformer%20by%20Gaston%20Burridge.pdf

See the two images and the component anotations?

It is the men of insight and the men of unobstructed vision of every generation who are able to lead us through the quagmire of a in-a-rut thinking. It is the men of imagination who are able to see relationships which escape the casual observer. It remains for the men of intuition to seek answers while others avoid even the question.
                                                                                                                                    -Frank Edwards