Hubbard coil

[pese]

  I belieive Hubbard used radium in his distributor.  (Moray was into coating his filaments with radioactive stuff) 

possibly,
but:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5052.251
this here is also an 8 coil device (near to Hubbard)
this will (possibly) work wit 20KW
without  any radium sources.
Pese

[HEYDUDE]

The specific claim made by Epiphany and others was that an "automobile distributor" was used as part of the Hubbard device.

I have not been able to find this claim in the old newspaper clippings. Perhaps a "rotating subcircuit" could be interpreted as a automobile distributor, but so could a ring counter or stepping relay.

For the sake of accuracy it would be helpful to refer only to the original texts, lest recent urban legends be transmuted into fact.

I might add that some of the photos used in the pdf's were much later (1970's) attempts at replication and are now being touted as actual Hubbard units.

[innovation_station]

guys i want to add somthing ....  this is important to  advanced devices...  perhaps the cause of the effect of this coil 

i have noticed in playing with caps and coils ...   a self oscolating engery ....   i have scoped this in the past  it ia a unique wave ...


this engery as i recall  slowly drains from the cap...  but it seams as tho it is filled agin i have had caps moveing for DAYS....  from 1 charge....

expairment ....  tiz the only way to learn .....


ist


ok now we are touching on my orbit 720 coil ..... the engery traped in the pmh IS IN MOTION LOL .........  AS IS IT IN COPPER

lol


and YES IT CAN BE SPED UP   LOL

mpi    ringgggg belllllllls lol

[giantkiller]

@Pese,
Yes. I believe Radium was thrown in there to make it difficult and to confuse. I do not believe he used that at all. It would make an oscillator.

@all,
Today, we all know better and have more intuitive mindsets to see through the smoke screen. Is what I said Gospel? Go get yourself some radium to find out. In the final products that Tesla showed they are very simple. Yes, he did use exotic materials in his testing. But really not necessary.

--giantkiller.

[tak22]

Here are what I think are two direct 'Hubbard' like attempts:

Paul Brown in 1989 http://www.google.com/patents?id=oKM5AAAAEBAJ&dq=4,835,433

When he discovered that 'The Moray Device and the Hubbard Coil were Nuclear Batteries' (published in Magnets in Your Future, March 1987)

William Barbat in 2006 http://www.google.com/patents?id=vI2XAAAAEBAJ&dq=william+barbat

The same year that the English translation of Leimer's paper appeared in Scientific American, 16-year old Alfred M. Hubbard of Seattle, Wash., reportedly invented a fuelless generator, which he later admitted employed radium. Applicant interprets this as implying that Leimer's energy-magnification was utilized by Hubbard with feedback to make it self-sustaining. Three years later Hubbard publicly demonstrated a relatively advanced fuelless generator that illuminated a 20-watt incandescent bulb (Anon. 1919a). A reputable physics professor from Seattle College, who was intimately familiar with Hubbard's device (but not at liberty to disclose its construction details), vouched for the integrity of the fuelless generator and declared that it was not a storage device, but he did not know why it worked (Anon. 1919b). Because Hubbard initially had no financial means of his own, it is likely the professor had provided Hubbard with the use of the expensive radium initially and thereby witnessed the inventing process in his own laboratory.

tak