Magnetic OU principle, You should really take a look at this !

[Yucca]

Yucca,
If you get it running could we come by your shop or home to take a look at it running.
Regards,
Butch LaFonte

Hi Butch,

You sure can but my home/lab is in southern Spain.

If it does run (I hope it does!) it maybe better if I posted one to Stefan in Germany, I doubt I could get 1 watt out with collector coils so I wouldn't be eligible for the prize, but I think everyone on here would trust his appraisal and inter European parcel post is quite reasonable.

I'll be making a youtube vid of the results either way.

All the best, Yucca.

[rha8b]

@infringer
You stated earlier that you had produced a replication of the fanner magnet setup using washers etc,
If possible, could you post a photo of this setup, I am interested in testing it for myself.

Thanks,
-rha8b

[Koen1]

but you need TWO "Lafonte HARMONICS" ( IIIII ), constructed on this principal:

while one magnet pair ENTERS first IIIII , the other magnet pair LEAVES other IIIII (at a same angle and distance)

that way net IN energy is only friction. OUTPUT is pure strenght of magnets.

Wiz

Is that so?
I haven't read everything in this thread entirely, but I got the impression that the main idea
was to use the seperation of the filaments to produce output... And that, in order to do that,
we need to have them seperate by magnetic means, then "fall together" again, then seperate
again, and so on...
Now if we have a magnet pair "enter" the position that causes the filaments to seperate, at the
same time that the previous magnet pair "exits" the position, would that not cancel out the
"fall together" action? If the filaments stay seperated because they constantly "see" a flux
from a magnet pair, then how exactly are we going to use the seperating action to produce
output at all?

I suspect I have missed something crucial somewhere...?
Please point out where I lost track, if anyone has spotted that point.

I also missed how exactly we arrive at a 50:1 OU factor...
I'll read the thread again, but would really appreciate if any of you could briefly comment.

Regards,
Koen

[wizkycho]

Is that so?
I haven't read everything in this thread entirely, but I got the impression that the main idea
was to use the seperation of the filaments to produce output... And that, in order to do that,
we need to have them seperate by magnetic means, then "fall together" again, then seperate
again, and so on...

Yes It Is So

Now if we have a magnet pair "enter" the position that causes the filaments to seperate, at the
same time that the previous magnet pair "exits" the OTHER position,

would that not cancel out the
"fall together" action? If the filaments stay seperated because they constantly "see" a flux
from a magnet pair, then how exactly are we going to use the seperating action to produce
output at all?

the way you missinterpreted it - it would ? (missing OTHER)

I suspect I have missed something crucial somewhere...? You missed WORDS, read carefully
Please point out where I lost track, if anyone has spotted that point.

I also missed how exactly we arrive at a 50:1 OU factor... read my replay 58
If cogging is eliminated menas that device is megnetically balanced (angles of exits enters are same)
- only friction IN, Complete magnet strenght OUT.
I'll read the thread again, but would really appreciate if any of you could briefly comment.

Regards,
Koen
Wiz

[infringer]

Yucca,

I look forward to the results of your build weather good or bad a video says many words thank you for the hard work.