The One Million Dollar HHO Challenge is launched

[0ne]

xjet, you are aware that you can design a fuel cell (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuel_cell) that only collects H2 right? Are you also aware, that unless you make H2 in a vacuum, there will ALWAYS be oxygen present... right?

Also, do you not believe I invented anti-gravity? Or would you like me to drop a 30ton block on your head?  Or maybe you can take a look at Coral Castle, the guy that created it, Ed Leedskalnin, told me how to do it! 

Also, it seems you are way out of your league. Since you don't even know basic science!  Do you think electrolysis is a LAW? Because if you do, then you are an idiot.  Electrolysis is not 0NE method, nor is there 0NE way to make hydrogen with electricity... some reason your empty skull doesn't realize that.

p.s. have you ever herd of the "reverse casimir effect"?

probably not...

oh and if you want overunity, check out my magnet battery..

http://www.lawofmagnetism.com/magbat.html

More energy out.. no energy in. Wow overunity!

I deal with theories you don't even know about yet.

[xjet]

oh and if you want overunity, check out my magnet battery..

http://www.lawofmagnetism.com/magbat.html

More energy out.. no energy in. Wow overunity!

I deal with theorys you don't even know about yet.

Sigh....

Another basic mistake that people who know very little about *true* science often make.

Here's a useful reference to describe how your "magnetic" battery is really working:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_cell

Hint.. there is moisture in the skin of your fingers and metals from which the keeper and magnet are made are not identical -- hence a galvanic potential is created.

The effect is even greater when you use a water-soaked tissue because the water is acting as an electrolyte.

For goodness sake man, instead of telling us how "clever" you are you're simply showing your incredible ignorance of basic science and making yourself look foolish.  And whenever you're about to make another stunning announcement as to how you've come up with some silly piece of pseudo-science, take a moment to reflect on  Occam's Razor.

Your "magnetic battery" web-page would send anyone with even a modicum of scientific knowledge into fits of laughter.  Now stop it and go do your homework.

[0ne]

Here's a useful reference to describe how your "magnetic" battery is really working:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_cell

WRONG!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQHLtSDwtyc

I have already proven it is not galvanic! doh! where are you gonna run now huh? Your theories don't explain this! wow! what are you going to do now? LOL

Yeah go read about triboelectrical effects and magnetostatics, and you will still not figure it out LOL.

[xjet]

WRONG!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQHLtSDwtyc

I have already proven it is not galvanic! doh! where are you gonna run now huh? Your theorys don't explain this! wow! what are you going to do now? LOL

Okay, repeat the test *without* a magnet but with another piece of dissimilar metal.  You might be surprised at what you see.

And remember, *true* science involves using controls and repeatable experiments.  There's none of that here.  Where is the control experiment using a non-magnetic material?  How many times was this experiment repeated and what was the voltage read/mean/average/SD?

Have you accounted for stray external magnetic fields (which often introduce voltages as high as tens or even hundreds of mV in conductors some distance from the source -- remember Tesla???)  after all, you're inside a giant coil of mains-wiring while your in a house or workshop so capacitive/inductive pickup is almost a certainty.  Have you conducted the experiment inside a magnetically shielded environment to discount such effects?

Before you can make a statement as bold as "My explanation will involve things not yet known by traditional science" you must first know a little about traditional science -- which you clearly don't.  You can only claim "unknown" after you've eliminated all the "know" causes - which you obviously haven't because you don't even know half of the conventional science involved.


Also, with a mind as closed as yours, I doubt you'll ever learn anything new.

[0ne]

xjet,

I know everything about static electricity and electricity in general, I know everything about magnetostatics, I know everything that you ever learned. Yes, I know your theories. I also know OTHER theories.

Do you truly believe that your theories explain all of the world? Do you truly believe that you know everything about the universe and there is nothing left to discover? Did it ever cross your mind that there is more than 1 way to explain things, and still be correct?

Maybe you should EXPERIMENT instead of using your missing brain.

Or maybe you should try reading:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,4762.0.html

Let me ask you a question...

What is a magnetic field? Is it a wave, or is it particles?  {whistles jeopardy theme song}


p.s. I can replicate ALL of Teslas inventions, and inventions he didn't get a chance to release. I can also explain the double slit experiment, can you?