Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


this pyramid should produce electricity. (thomas trawoger's pyramid explaned.)

Started by nitinnun, July 16, 2008, 04:57:47 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

amigo

The issue is incompatible energies.

Everyone wants to hook up a motor to a pyramid and power their washing machine. But the Nature provides "subtle" energies that all life works on, and motors are not alive - they are dead machines that heat and waste energy when connected to a source of compatible power.

If you want to get more insights into the pyramids, check out the work of Les Brown on the subject. Also for some quantitative portion (I know everyone loves to measure stuff) look up Pat Flanagan and his research into pyramid energy. Either will lead you to a conclusion of "subtle" energies which require a totally different paradigm to harness than what we presently use.

nitinnun


i've shifted my focus.

i'm contemplating a frequency-excited wimhurst machine.
which is similar to the overunity torroid. minus a large number of the torroids flaws.


the 2 wheels will even be turned by electrostatic motors.
which run on lots of voltage, and little amperage.


if the electrostatic motors are efficient enough,
and the wimhrust wheels are light enough,
and the wimhurst output is great enough.....

than it will generate more electricity, than it takes to run.


and the superiority of my straw and zip tie wheel-supports,
will vastly help it happen !



once in awhile, i fondly remember my pyramid efforts.
its physics are VERY similar to hwo the pyramid works.
but i feel that the overunity wimhurst, is the more practical option.


i have idea's for many, many things.
i will run out of idea's last.

spiralout

hola Amigo,

thanks for your comments.

I've just recently started too look into the world of FE seriously and being a designer in my orientation, I'm  instinctivly being drawn to the concept of shape power.

now, I understand what you say about the incompatibility of the different energies but I humbly disagree. the way I see it, these subtle energies are the underlying principle for everything that exist. electricity, being a part of everything that exist, does not stand in contradiction to the subtle forces. it is simply a crude and more tangible derivative of these energies. the problem, from my point of view, are the means by which we currently produce electricity (or energy in general).  we are currently producing energy by means of brute force, heat and friction, but energy is a subtle force in principle and as such should be handled gently and elegantly. nature doesn't strain himself to produce the endless variety of energies that it manifests, it does it by the means of different shapes and materials for different tasks.

I know (not believe) that the solution for the riddle of FE is far more simple than we are willing to admit right now. as a collective, we developed a tendency towards complexity, and have been led to beLIEve
that more is better. that is, evidently, not the case but changing the mind of an entire planet is not something easily achieved. the first step for changing the current paradigm is for each of us to become more aligned with the natural order of things and more conductive to ideas, concepts and dreams. by doing so we would be able to create machines that are more aligned to the subtle forces around us.

QuoteNature provides "subtle" energies that all life works on, and motors are not alive - they are dead machines

I agree, motors are not alive, but they didn't just appear out of thin air, they were designed by people who were very much alive and because these people had the wrong or incomplete idea about how things function in our reality, the machines they were able to produce reflected these flaws. we cannot escape what we are.

I hope my next posts will be of more practical nature, as I will be soon starting to work on a pyramid project of my own but I'll be glad for any comments, it helps me to sharpen my ideas.
the pyramid that I'm thinking of building is based on the ideas posted here by nitinnun, ie. aluminum and copper on a wooden frame with the addition of an attempted replica of the markovich device as the means of harvesting the energy.


spiral, out.






 




   

amigo

Hi spiralout,

You are absolutely right on all points, I was just "lazy" to be elaborate, or exact, in my post because I did not know what level of response you were expecting.

And so I apologize for slacking it off...I should've known better :)

Question is will people shift to the old paradigm of alignment to the Nature?

So far all I can see is a status quo, still trying to go through the wall in other words. It is very difficult to find people who are truly willing to look at things from a different perspective, to abolish their belief system(s), or alter them accordingly with new facts absorbed.

I have been researching this subject for a while now, though have not engaged in any experiments outside my mind yet, mostly trying to work things out and put the pieces together (pieces that usually do not go together, or belong to the same field even) :)

I'll be interested to hear how your experiment goes, please keep us updated.


spiralout

hi y'all,

Amigo, thanks for responding, this is the first time i'm posting anything anywhere and your feedback was well appreciated.

I know i said I'll post when I'll have something more practical to report but the last couple of days I've been having quit a few ideas and insights of a more general nature and I would like to share them before they slip away.

the first idea is in regards to our surrounding  environment and the way we experience it. I was thinking about the concept of the standing wave when a thought hit me: what if the reality that we encounter on a daily basis, is one big standing wave? picture it this way, energy being emitted from the center of the earth in all directions is being confronted with energy that comes from space so they both collide and create a zone in which energy is motionless and can solidify to the endless variety of materials that compose our world. now, I have no idea if this is already common knowledge or I'm simply talking out of my ass, but it does help to explain why everything seems to be solid even thou it's composed of energy. It's like the "pressure" from the colliding energies is keeping everything in form.

another thing that came into mind has to do with the issue of: what the fuck is energy, anyway!? but before i lay down my version, a quick note about the current "scientific" definition of energy. i can only say it is one of the lamest things I have ever heard, is everything just about work in this world? work=slavery and as long as people hold on to this slave mentality, they will never be free to create free energy machines.
what I am offering is an approach that is somewhat naive. what if  we view this "energy" as a living entity? not just a force that animates life and can be used to preform different tasks, but something that is alive by itself and therefore has some characteristic of a living thing. let us assume, for the sake of the argument, that this is the case and energy has a kind of intelligence, a will maybe and even needs and desires.
you might be asking yourself ,"how the hell does that help us to understand energy?"  well, there are a few things that we know for a fact about energy and although very general they'll might be of help.
1.energy is omnipresent (I love this word... :)) meaning: it's in every place and every time.
2.energy is infinite, I'm not a 100% sure about that one, but from a human life span perspective, it certainly is.
3.energy cannot be created nor can it be destroyed.
now, let us take this concept of energy as a living entity one step further and treat it as a person (just to make it easier for us to relate). what  would be the best way for us to understand this "person"? for me that would be trying to put myself in the position of that person and imagining what it would feel to be him.
so? what would you like to do if you were this entity that has all these amazing abilities? 9 to 5?  I seriously doubt it!
I cannot answer that for you, but for me it's pretty clear. if i was energy itself, i would be looking for the most creative ways to keep myself entertained! what else is there to do when you have no care in the universe?
well, if you're still reading this and you wonder where the hell am i going with this, then we're on the same boat, brother  :)  but, bare with me, this fantasy might just come out logical, who knows?
now, let us assume, for the sake of argument, that everything that I've just proposed, is true and we accept it as a fact. how does it help us to understand energy? well, there is another thing that we can say about energy, which is not a scientific fact, but i think we can all agree upon by merely looking at the world around us.  energy enjoys natural ,flowing and fractal shapes. you will never ever see a cube anywhere in the natural world and even spheres and triangles are rare, always being broken in some way. why? because perfect geometrical shapes are inhibitors of development, they do not allow for any escape route for the energy and are in fact closed systems. and if we agree (for the sake of yada, yada...) that energy is a living thing, I don't know of any living thing that wants to imprisoned.

so, where does all this fancy talking leaves us? the way I see it, accuracy, symmetry and rigid shape are essential when you're designing complicated machines with many moving parts that have to be timed precisely. but I have no doubt that in order to manipulate and channel energy into usable forms, we don't need a single ball bearing, shaft or piston. it's all about allowing the energy to flow in a way that suits its "needs".

it's 7:30 in the morning, I've been up all night writing this crap, hope you'll enjoy it.


spiral, out.