Linnard?s hydrogen on demand system without electricity !

[ResinRat2]

Hi Buzneg,

This project has gone through many stages of development, and I guess I don't realize how much it has changed. Give me a few days and I will complile my work and post it as a PDF file.

In my mind this system is already obsolete as I have many ideas on design changes, but I will take a breather and put some effort into posting my present and latest apparatus design, materials, and procedures. I won't be doing too much until my platinum coated wires arrive anyway. Right now I am in the process of thought-development. I am trying to decide the correct new reactor design for future experiments.

Sorry for the frustration I am causing, but sometimes I just keep running and running and don't look back.

Thanks for your interest and support.

[Micha]

Hei ResinRat2 ,
today i read a article in the german technology review about water elektrolysis through  sunlight , they used titandisilicid pouder as katalysator ,the process works witout elektricity just only sunlight, i know that your system works on a different basis , but who knows maybe it will make it more effectic to use titandisilcilid shoud be a thougt worth . the article was in the Angewandte Chemie Vol 119  S 7917-7921 , Autor Martin Demuth ,
If you are interested I can post the article as pdf , but its in german , iam following your work since a while and ist looks very interesting so keep going
Micha

[hansvonlieven]

G'day Micha,

If the article is not too big, would you please be so kind and post it here. Many of us here speak German.

Tach Micha,

Bitte sei so freundlich und post den Artikel hier, falls er nicht zu umfangreich ist. Viele von uns lesen deutsch.

Danke

Hans von Lieven

[Dr. Tesla]

Gents,

The patent Stefan has posted at the beginning of this thread is not a patent. While it has been granted, it is just another monumental proof of ultimate ineptitude and incompetence in the US patent office. Which is as we in a developed world all know only to well, legendary for the sheer stupidity.

Here's why: patents must describe a novel method or apparatus that is NOT apparent from the previous art. This patent describes a piezoelectric effect which is merely applied to a water solution, with intent to produce gasses from water.

Which part here is NEW and NOT  apparent to most of us? Using exotic materials such as tungsten carbide does not necessarily represent a novelty as the authors themselves confirm that it is known to have catalythic and conductive properties.

Furthermore, authors also admit in their patent (not a good sign for the patented method) that there are metals consumed in the process, which is contrary to the suggestion by the patent itself, and they admitt also that they believe that these metals consumed may be recoverable in a reverse electric process. Believing is implied ignorance, and that suggest that they did not recover them in their experiments, which in turn invalidates the patent as well.

Snake water anyone? It's cheap and good for you. You must believe. Knowledge is bad for business.

[Micha]

Here is the Article in shortform from November Technologie Review Germany, The whole Article is in the Angewandte Chemie ,

Hallo Hans hier der Article .
Gru?
Micha