Mysterious Resonant Circuit

[BEP]

@EMDevices

P=1.414*RMS
P=.5*P-P
P-P=2*P
RMS=.707*P

Assuming 'P' equals peak....

Power=Volts*Amps - Sort Of.


FYI for others: RMS stands for "Root Mean Square"  to find it, take your peak to peak
voltage and multiply by .707.
        This assumes a sine wave.  And
        RMS is .707 the Vpeak.

or take RMS voltage and divide by .707 to get back to the VP-P
        This would get U to Vpeak.  Vp-p would be twice that.

I'm sure EM knows this but lets let him finish. Results good or bad, I can't wait! Either way this sounds like near unity.

[EMdevices]

I guess the overunity prize has quite a few rules,  I had forgoten. 
Here's the link to it  (or you can see it as you log into overunity.com)   

http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2157.0.html

Looks like I need 50 watts usuable output power and to build 3 units, among other things, and send them out for verification.  Ok,  I'll start the process of scaling it up soon.

EM

[poynt99]

EMD's calculation is ok.

he used the "trick" where if you're lazy and don't want to calculate RMS from Vp, you just square the peak voltage and divide by double the load, which is why he divided by 2. confusing, but the same thing.

[nul-points]

interesting to note that the calculated COP for EM's inductor oscillator circuit is around the same figure for my switched-capacitor test circuit (my energy gain = 2.69Wsec/2.24Wsec = 1.2)

is it possible that there is some common feature of reactance which is connected with this overunity behaviour?

all the best
sandy
Doc Ringwood's Free Energy site  http://ringcomps.co.uk/doc

[Frederic2k1]

@ EMDevices

Did you measured the resistor if it is really 150 Ohm ?

regards