Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Tri-Gate Motor (TGM)

Started by 4Tesla, August 03, 2008, 05:08:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 39 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ergo

It's OK, you can all call me negative, and I really am negative in finding OU in any device using
the Trigate or simular combinations of magnets. It will always even out the forces involved.
You can have temporary movement from these contrapments but you loose that movement in closed loop.

I do believe in OU devices, but only designs that utilises a magnetic gradient to accomplish torque.
The most common is the SMOT, but Sprains device is a more beautiful implementation of this concept.

Paul-R

Quote from: eavogels on September 06, 2008, 07:59:36 AM
(This website is very often broken. Saving money by choosing a cheap host service is not a good thing.)
The problem is  the signal to noise ratio. If you check the data download symbol, you will
find that most pages are around 200k of data, of which 1k is of value to us, and the rest is
advertising and crap. I accept the need for some advertising, but the design of this site
is dreadful.
Paul.

4Tesla

Quote from: Ergo on September 15, 2008, 02:59:15 AM
It's OK, you can all call me negative, and I really am negative in finding OU in any device using
the Trigate or simular combinations of magnets. It will always even out the forces involved.
You can have temporary movement from these contrapments but you loose that movement in closed loop.

I do believe in OU devices, but only designs that utilises a magnetic gradient to accomplish torque.
The most common is the SMOT, but Sprains device is a more beautiful implementation of this concept.

It isn't a closed loop and it isn't balanced.  I used gaps to keep it from being closed and divided the arrays into thirds and the armature into quarters.. please don't post your same comments over and over.

Thanks,
Jason

Ergo

Quote from: 4Tesla on September 15, 2008, 01:34:35 PM
It isn't a closed loop and it isn't balanced.  I used gaps to keep it from being closed and divided the arrays into thirds and the armature into quarters.

You misunderstand me. It is not the gaps that determine wether it is closed loop or not.
Closed loop simply means self running. If you get it to self run then is is closed loop.
The circular movement being able to run on its own. But this won't happen using the Tri-Gates.
It has been tried countless of times and the efffect declines as soon as you try to make it run circular.
But keep on trying. It fun to read about people trying even the most impossible. Good bless you!

broli

I have so far seen none use shielding as the main theme in their experiments. There are some threads about this but so far I have seen no builds.