Antigravity effect based on a principle of counter-rotating magnets

[v71]

Very intersting, actually i was thinking back again to my antigravity research.
I have built an inertial propulsor using rotating masses , it loses weight , but not so much to be usefull
for thrusting, it is bades around gyros, 3 gyros rotating in a direction mounted on a base rotating in a plane which is ortogonal to both angular momentum, this is officially called precession, but i think that a lot more is involved.
I am willing to partecipate in this project since i have too many ideas to share.
My intention is to build a high voltage generator and electrify two counter rotating alluminiun plaets, just like the guy in
the thread above.

[z.monkey]

Howdy V71,

Welcome to the Weird Science Club...

squeege69, yeah, the system will be "lossy" but we can look at that as work done.  In fact it is going to take a lot of energy to fly.  This is why were starting with a free energy generator, maybe we can make it economical to fly.  Even a scale model with two iron flywheels it will still take a considerable amount of energy to spin the wheels up to lift velocity and maintain that velocity and have reserve energy to maneuver.  A small note here, I have been reviewing the Vril notes and the upper flywheel is smaller in diameter than the lower flywheel.  On the advanced Vril ship there are 3 gyros mounted on the lower flywheel for stabilization.  Apparently the two flywheels alone are wobbly, hard to control.  A story about the original test flight stated that the pilot (an experienced Luftwaffe combat pilot) barely escaped with his life because the Vril ship was so hard to control.  So I guess that we are already modifying the original plans...

Blessed Be...

[v71]

The reason why a flywheel is smaller in diameter is because of differential graviton flow pressure , my theory is that gravity is made of particles which flows into matter in an anisotropic fashion where mass is absent, mass as an inherent (sp??)  propriety of allowing gravitons to flow inside of it, the more flux, the heavier the object is.
This explains also why an object cannot travel more than the speed of light.
At that speed , the graviton flux, cannot move inside an object more than the speed it is intrinsically allowed to move.
The earth is massive in mass , so an enormous flow of gravitons travels from the surrounding space , unordered, into the earth, the flow is directed towards the center, and thus is oriented , once reached the center, the nucles starts to heat, gravitons are partially rejected, back, and create an outward current .
So gravity is attractive and repulsive , just like the magnetism.
Actually there are several ways to block the influx of gravitons
high voltage ( are electrons really gravitons particles ?)
rotating magnetic fields
specially designed arrays of nanomaterials
frequency vibration , both sound and em wave
The gyros on the Vril , reminds me of my attempts to inertial propulsion, i think that the reason was to stabilisze the device, i noticed that the formulas in books are wrong in the case of precession.
I found that it is not the classic a=mgr/I formula which describes the precession force.
Another one is to cancel the magentic field, in an em wave leaving the electrical component to oscillate.
Electrical oscillation forces the g vector to align orthogonally to the e field.
Basically , e, b, g are vector which are orthogonal to each other, university teaches us that only e and b are orthogonal.
But the poyinting vector which is the cross vector beetween e and b, is acutally the g v ector
Worth to investigate.

[z.monkey]

Howdy V71,

You are the only person that I have seen use the word graviton on this website the entire time I have been a member.  I haven't read all the threads, but I have read a lot.  I do believe that faster than light travel is possible, but it is going to take more than the Vril technology to do that.  Also the information I have about Vril technology leaves a lot of questions.  I have a lot of information available to me, but it is all superficial.  There are not many critical technical details.  There are people out there in the world that understand this technology completely, and may even have functioning levitators, but they cannot share any information because they are part of some secret group.  That is all right, because I am going to learn a lot more about this technology by starting from scratch, rather than if I was to make a copy of someones design.  One thing is for sure, this is going to be a lot of machine work, my favorite...

Blessed Be...

[squegee69]

Howdy V71,

Welcome to the Weird Science Club...

squeege69, yeah, the system will be "lossy" but we can look at that as work done.  In fact it is going to take a lot of energy to fly.  This is why were starting with a free energy generator, maybe we can make it economical to fly.  Even a scale model with two iron flywheels it will still take a considerable amount of energy to spin the wheels up to lift velocity and maintain that velocity and have reserve energy to maneuver.  A small note here, I have been reviewing the Vril notes and the upper flywheel is smaller in diameter than the lower flywheel.  On the advanced Vril ship there are 3 gyros mounted on the lower flywheel for stabilization.  Apparently the two flywheels alone are wobbly, hard to control.  A story about the original test flight stated that the pilot (an experienced Luftwaffe combat pilot) barely escaped with his life because the Vril ship was so hard to control.  So I guess that we are already modifying the original plans...

Blessed Be...

Amen to that, Brother.  Did not mean to leave you with the impression I was being critical.  Considering the day and age we live in, once one problem is solved, the other will come along nicely.  Correct about relearning everything - getting untaught all the mischief we picked up in classical education is going to be a chore.

If you don't mind my asking, are your sources of information on Vril public or private in nature?  Any resources you can point a fellow hungry mind toward?

Peace!