How testatika can produce 3 kW running at low rpm?

[Moab]

WOW Guys,, What a wonderful read.. Thankyou..!

Keep it going please.

[f_dyne]

@ Moab
thank you, you're welcome.

@ Steve
after some brain scraping, I could find one effect of using ferrite as a high resistance antenna, a la "stromerzeuger".
This kind of device, driven in HV shf,  should concentrate charges on the poles (for example, all plus charges on north pole and all minus charges on south pole).
This comes at a price... if you have a superimposed amplifying coil, the energy amplification should be reduced because you are separating opposite deionizing charges.
It should be possible to obtain amplification through contact charging of metal plates on poles, though.
Is this the principle behind top-left and top-right small single disk machine condensers? I don't know yet.

F_dyne

[f_dyne]

F_dyne

[Grumpy]

The output cans are particularly interesting - alternating layers and a final output layer - reminds me ot the Joe Cell and Ev Gray tube.

[mscoffman]

Mark,
As a result of what you say above, I'd really like to hear what you think of what I said above about electron cascade. I think the same reasons would apply to why I'd think that electrostatic generators COP<1. But I'd be happy to be wrong.

-Steve
http://rimstar.org

I was going to do a post on that. I'll have to read some more about the effect. But I think what happens is
that ionized matter simply causes other free electrons to collect together in groups of like static electric charges.
It's sort of like fire, where a fire in one part of the material cause the fire in another part.  The reason I put this
COP>1 law together is that it seems as if one puts ionized matter on a "lazy susan" and rotates it around in the
environment one could always make the lazy susan somewhat larger and one would recruit even more charge.
add some antenna wires and get even more again. This lack of a seeming one-for-one collection criteria makes
it much different from the operation of an electromagnetic generator which has very tight laws coupling input energy
and output energy. Why is collecting of ionized charges any different then the heatpump's collection of thermal
carriers?  A difference between heatpumps and static electric generators is that Carnot's law inhibits the efficiency
of thermal engines, but that efficiency limitation does not bind electrostatic conversions for motor operation,
meaning self running systems are possible.

This whole process is made possible by the "electroweak nuclear force", which allow the electrons to reside
together even though their like charges should send them flying apart. The question is whether any additional
explanations are really necessary above that the charges can recruit one another and the electrons can reside
together in groups because of the electroweak force.

Now, I will say, that if one takes this tendency down to the atomic size scale it is highly suggestive that
one may be able to find a pathway by which the electroweak force causes mass to energy conversion. This
pathway may have been overlooked by researches during WWII as they "went for the gold" of reactions
involving the highly energetic strong nuclear force. So there may be some chapters yet to be written for
science's book of atomic (rather than nuclear) energy. I am not really a physics person and don't know
the math and also have my hands full with existing overunity stuff. But I really hope that you or someone
else may be able to crack this and seems like it would be a worthwhile study.

As for the macro scale this effect cannot be considered ZPE zero point energy because nature already knows
about it, as thunderstorms create ionized matter. The fix up currents of atmospheric electricity can themselves be
a source of energy. Terry Tharp in one of those videos said; "it is highly unusual but lightning seems to keep striking
my laboratory".  What does that tell you about how his high speed overunity generator operates?


:S:MarkSCoffman