Gravity self-pulsatory eccenter...

[iacob alex]

   ...can be the next proposal,related in a short expression,as a possible gravity powered collector.

     The main abstraction,image is that of a pair D-F(driver-folower),helping one another to move and commute between centric-eccentric positions,so to get as a result, a self revolving(not swinging...) pendular (eccentric) picture.

     The first image is that of a fulcrum and of a great centric mass(M) coupled(with an arm) to a small eccentric mass(m) .

      If the small mass(m) makes a free full up-down fall(180*) in gravity,it will play as a driver for the great mass(M),introducing a spinning motion for the follower.

      At the end of this sequence,if the great mass(M),is so designed to self-commute from the centric to the eccentric position(due to gravity),and in the same time to determine the transition of the small mass(m) from the eccentric to the centric position,this time (M) is the driver and (m) is the follower.

      If (M) plays as a pendulum/eccentric mass ,we must take into account his initial,starting velocity...so a new circumstance .

      The last image,is that of the great mass(M),self-commuting from the eccentric to the centric position(due to the same gravity),and in the same time moving the small mass(m) from the centric to the eccentric   position.
   
       And again...

       All that we play is gravity and rotational inertia.


               All the Bests!  /  Alex

[Alexioco]

   ...can be the next proposal,related in a short expression,as a possible gravity powered collector.

     The main abstraction,image is that of a pair D-F(driver-folower),helping one another to move and commute between centric-eccentric positions,so to get as a result, a self revolving(not swinging...) pendular (eccentric) picture.

     The first image is that of a fulcrum and of a great centric mass(M) coupled(with an arm) to a small eccentric mass(m) .

      If the small mass(m) makes a free full up-down fall(180*) in gravity,it will play as a driver for the great mass(M),introducing a spinning motion for the follower.

      At the end of this sequence,if the great mass(M),is so designed to self-commute from the centric to the eccentric position(due to gravity),and in the same time to determine the transition of the small mass(m) from the eccentric to the centric position,this time (M) is the driver and (m) is the follower.

      If (M) plays as a pendulum/eccentric mass ,we must take into account his initial,starting velocity...so a new circumstance .

      The last image,is that of the great mass(M),self-commuting from the eccentric to the centric position(due to the same gravity),and in the same time moving the small mass(m) from the centric to the eccentric   position.
   
       And again...

       All that we play is gravity and rotational inertia.


               All the Bests!  /  Alex

Where are the images?

[iacob alex]

.....uses a method(centric to eccentric commutation,and then back),that is intended  to be the equivalent of the pair "floating-sinking".

     One and another are in relation with gravity.

     One in rotational inertia,the other in water (buoyancy).

     Moving a mass in a centric rotation (eccentric to centric commutation),acts alike a buoyancy,a floating in water...

     It can be a way of easy  "weight/mass lift" to the next position(usually up...) of the arrangement.

     Then,with a second step of the commutation (centric to eccentric),the mass becomes  again "heavy",ready to "sinking" and so can use the properties of the gravity fall.

     It's as simple as a hide and seek game.

     Then,why the question "Where are the images?"(Alexioco) ?!

     Some abstractions,as a floating-sinking into inertia ,becomes weak,unhappy when we can try to fix on the paper...

     As said the famous French painter,Delacroix ..."The artist who aims at perfection in everything achieves it in nothing".

     But...you know:...make something,happiness will follow.

     In a clear night,if you look up on the sky...you have the best image.



              All the Bests!  /  Alex
     

[broli]

When I look up in the sky I see clouds so yes it is the same!...That is that your post is one cloudy mess :p. Seriously cut the fancy words and start making some drawings because we can't read your brains telepathically. People always seem to forget that the ones they are explaining to have not experienced what they did. You have come to this idea through a series of steps and conclusions. You can't expect people to know what you're talking about with just one paragraph of text using fancy words like "eccentric commutation".

[Dr]

Broli: I think you should visit Jacob Alex's web site before you start throwing stones, he has plenty of drawings, and very nice ones at that!