Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



A Self-Charging Adams Motor

Started by lanenal, August 23, 2008, 10:05:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

lanenal

An Adams Motor that charges its own supply battery?! Any comments on this idea with its schematic?

Please see the attached schematic.

P.S.: This schematic uses Reed switches to illustrate the idea, but I don't see why other equivalent stuff can not be used instead as well.

P.P.S.: For some experiments on Adams Motor with Reed switches: http://www.mintakafulcrum.net/

gyulasun

@lanenal

Hi,

You show a clever circuit, and this could be used for other circuits where you wish to switch a coil on and off (say an electromagnet from a battery)  and you will be able to capture the flyback pulse from the coil and add the pulse energy back to the same battery when you switch the current off with the switches. 

Did you design this circuit? I have not seen this published elsewhere yet.

Thanks,  Gyula

lanenal

@Gyula

Thanks for the encouragement, and for your nice observations. This circuit (if it could be called one) was inspired by the schematic for Mk3.0 found at http://www.mintakafulcrum.net/. The original one charges another battery, so I played with the idea of charging the same one (at least you can save one, and my hope was that it would be easier to prove overunity as there were disputes on how to measure output). With this simple schematic, I wonder what would happen if the switching frequency reaches to the range of 100Hz-800Hz? Would that draw some ether energy into the system? :)

Anyway, I wish this to be out there into the public domain, and anyone who is interested can take a look, make their own adoptions, and play with it freely.

Have a good one,

lanenal

gyulasun

Quote from: lanenal on August 23, 2008, 05:40:27 PM


With this simple schematic, I wonder what would happen if the switching frequency reaches to the range of 100Hz-800Hz? Would that draw some ether energy into the system? :)


@lanenal

I cannot answer your question unfortunately, on drawing some ether energy... I do not know. 
But I am sure the change of frequency is always a good idea to find a "sweet point" somewhere in the f range because any coil with the given geometry it was just made surely have a preferred frequency where its properties are the best for a certain job, especially so for coils with ferromagnetic cores.  In case of Adams motor though the RPM so the frequency can be changed up to some value where mechanical properties of the rotor may suffer already and become a limiting factor.

If you have not seen it, have a look at this link for a schematic where a similar problem is shown solved with two coils from member BEP here: http://www.overunity.com/index.php/topic,2831.msg41943.html#msg41943  He gave some explanation in that thread earlier in his Reply#20 on that schematics.

Thanks,  Gyula

lanenal

@Gyula

Very thoughtful comments, they are really helpful. Along this line of thought, one idea comes to my mind is to apply this thing to Dragone's schematic as shown in the attachments. Specifically, my circuit can be applied to the driving coils to save input energy, and further boost up the efficiency. Dragone's schematic reports a 200% efficiency originally. Now suppose we can manage to save 50% input energy by applying my circuit (of course, should replace the switching mechanism with something equivalent), then the efficiency should be doubled, ending up with 400%. Now let's be conservative, suppose in Dragone's original circuit there were no OU effect, but just a very high, almost 100% transformation (or just apply my circuit to a high efficiency transformer!). Then with the addition of energy savings with the application of my circuit, a 200% COP can be expected, yes? An almost sure OU device, eh? :)

Cheers,

lanenal