Aliens are coming October 14th 2008 Galactic Federation

[z.monkey]

Howdy Sprocket,

Sorry, Inquiring minds want to know...  A good friend of mine was suspicious about the AoH document as well.  I have heard from the Christ Sananda (Jesus), Christ Michael, and the Sirian (from Sirius) channels that the nukes are disabled by the Galactic Federation so the Dark Cabal cannot wreak anymore havoc.  I am really enjoying the "Unveiled Mysteries" book.  Can't wait to put this one into practice...

BLessed Be...

[orbs]

Contradictions in channelings are to be expected, as far as I understand it. First, the information is often coming from outside of earth, so they can only see how much weight certain tendencies have, and pick the top ones as predictions. It is always a guess, because not all information is available outside of earth and because today most situations are volatile (again, very close to balance so that only a little bit changes a lot). Second, it also depends in which "group" you are. There are currently 3 major groups (and many minor ones): roughly about 2/3 consciously or subconsciously choose war and destruction, less than 1/3 choose to stay with the current earth (who moves to 4th and 5th density) and come into the Golden Age, and a very small part (several millions) that also move to higher densities (or greater awareness) but elsewhere. The first group is transferring (die and [re-]incarnate) to other earth-like planets because they wouldn't be able to stay here (because this earth changes and wouldn't provide usable raw material for their bodies anymore). They won't necessarily "notice a difference" though, just the same old struggles, battles, wars and distractions as usual. Third, it seems time moves differently for different observers. They don't seem to base years on the same rotations as we do. Also, we assume that time moves always at the same speed ("linear"), which does not seem to be the case (or the speeds are also different depending on the observing perspective/angle).

So if they make predictions according to the biggest groups (or possibly just the group they are also in, if they don't have enough awareness to be outside of these "groups") and the most likely potential (extrapolated from past and current events), it would probably mean some kind of war. If they assume the group that stays with earth as she evolves, that would mostly mean peace. And of course, there are many other possible scenarios.

You have to kind of develop a "feeling" for whose channels are resonating with you. There are some guidelines on the web (for example, look up Guidelines for Discernment). Or you could simply skim or partially read channelings and try to get a feel for it. But be warned that you should have some grounding (at least take some deep breaths every now and then, maybe do some [slow] physical exercise or go into the water, etc.). A place where you can find lots of channelings is this group. Use discernment!

[resonanceman]

Contradictions in channelings are to be expected, as far as I understand it. First, the information is often coming from outside of earth, so they can only see how much weight certain tendencies have, and pick the top ones as predictions. It is always a guess, because not all information is available outside of earth and because today most situations are volatile (again, very close to balance so that only a little bit changes a lot). Second, it also depends in which "group" you are. There are currently 3 major groups (and many minor ones): roughly about 2/3 consciously or subconsciously choose war and destruction, less than 1/3 choose to stay with the current earth (who moves to 4th and 5th density) and come into the Golden Age, and a very small part (several millions) that also move to higher densities (or greater awareness) but elsewhere. The first group is transferring (die and [re-]incarnate) to other earth-like planets because they wouldn't be able to stay here (because this earth changes and wouldn't provide usable raw material for their bodies anymore). They won't necessarily "notice a difference" though, just the same old struggles, battles, wars and distractions as usual. Third, it seems time moves differently for different observers. They don't seem to base years on the same rotations as we do. Also, we assume that time moves always at the same speed ("linear"), which does not seem to be the case (or the speeds are also different depending on the observing perspective/angle).

So if they make predictions according to the biggest groups (or possibly just the group they are also in, if they don't have enough awareness to be outside of these "groups") and the most likely potential (extrapolated from past and current events), it would probably mean some kind of war. If they assume the group that stays with earth as she evolves, that would mostly mean peace. And of course, there are many other possible scenarios.

You have to kind of develop a "feeling" for whose channels are resonating with you. There are some guidelines on the web (for example, look up Guidelines for Discernment). Or you could simply skim or partially read channelings and try to get a feel for it. But be warned that you should have some grounding (at least take some deep breaths every now and then, maybe do some [slow] physical exercise or go into the water, etc.). A place where you can find lots of channelings is this group. Use discernment!

Orbs

I agree that there  are some problems  with  the accuracy  of channeling .


I would  like to add  my  2 cents  worth  on  the subject .

As I see  it  the biggest problem  with  channeling  is that  we (  humans )  have been taught that only intellectual  thought  has any value. 
The  way to get the true message from a channeled message  is   by what  has been called thinking   from  the heart .   
Most  people   with a well  developed  intellect  have no  concept  of thinking from the heart . 
The ideal  path   of a channeled  message  is from the heart of the sender   through the senders  mind   ( being put into  words that fit  from the  senders perspective )     Then to the  receivers  mind   (  the meaning  of the  words is now interpreted from the  receivers  viewpoint . ) 

The intended  destination   of the message is the  heart of  the  receiver .
If the  person receiving the message doesn't  understand  enough about   thinking from the heart  the message never  makes it  to its destination .  It is  taken only at face value .    The  meaning  of the words  as  understood  by the receiver is the only meaning   that gets through . 


I would  suggest with any channeled message that  you  disregard  it if  it  doesn't  bring  love peace or joy to your heart l.       There  are entitys  in other realms that are able to  send messages telepathically  The  messages  from these  entitys  in the  lower realms  will  tend to be about ego power and control .   
The  messages from   beings in the higher realms  are  always  based in love .   so if a message isn't   love  it  isn't  from the higher realm or a  being more advanced than we are.


In short  if the message if the message  doesn't  bring  you a feeling   of peace love and joy .     it  is  probably not for  you.Or  it is not from someone  you can trust   .......so just  disregard it.

For those that  put all  their  faith in intellect  this  will mean  disregarding  most if not all  channeling.

gary

[nitinnun]

durring channeling:

the channeler translates non-linear information (gotten from the subconscious mind).
into linear information (that the conscious mind can understand).



channeling is influenced by:

* the strength of the channelers subconscious mind.

* the channelers ability to interpret/understand what they "find".

* the channelers ability to translate/relate what they "find", to other people.

* the channelers personal bias.

* additional knowledge, that allows the channeler to understand the finer details, of what they "find".

* the ability of the "channelers audience", to understand what the channeler tells them!
(the channelers audience, must use all of the above, to understand what the channeler says).



on top of that, the channeler might be describing a PROBABILITY.
yet probabilities, are not abolute. and are ALWAYS subject to change.
especially change, due to someones choices/actions.


for example, the US could have a 100% PROBABILITY, of going to war with korea.

but then, somebody somewhere takes an action.
this action changes the probability of a korean war, from 100% to 5%.

when the channeler gave him 100% probability on monday, the channeler was right.
because on monday, the probability for war, really was 100%.

then this anonymous person took this action on tuesday.
and the probability instantly dropped from 100% to 5%.


some naysayer complains that the channeler was "wrong!".
because the channelers prediction didn't come true!

but it is the naysayer who is at fault.
because the naysayer does not understand or respect, the limitations of channeling and probability.



the bottom line, is that channelers are more accurate on generalities, than they are on specifics.
so if dozzens of channelers are giving the same generality, than that generality is likely true.

but true or not, may still change.
as soon as some jackhole somewhere takes an action, that changes everything.

[shooter001]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xonF16P1BDE&feature=related